horrifying attack on Jussie Smollett

Status
Not open for further replies.
The massive walk back is beginning:

Cory Booker first said: "the vicious attack on actor Jussie Smollett was an attempted modern-day lynching." Now he says "I'm going to withhold [comment] until all the information actually comes out."
Click to expand...

Doubt we are going to get a walk back from the race grifters who referred to us white supremacists and racists for doubting this obviously bull **** story from the get go.
 
Thermal said:
For what criminal offenses? They were not even in the country, so they can't be accused of even knowing Smollett was going public with this.
Click to expand...

Someone mailed that letter. The stamps on it are cancelled. That was a felony.

Plus, you just never know what a GJ will come down with.

Assuming the GJ story is true.

Also assuming the prosecutor isn't using the GJ to prevent charges from being brought. That is, as cover for not bringing charges.
 
I'm afraid I'm having a hard time figuring out how the body building brothers could be completely innocent with the facts as I think I understand them.
 
RecoveringYuppy said:
I'm afraid I'm having a hard time figuring out how the body building brothers could be completely innocent with the facts as I think I understand them.
Click to expand...

It is rather difficult to come up with a positive or neutral reason one would stage a beating.
 
A humorous comment from YT

"When America is so tolerant you have to pay Nigerians to oppress you."
 
The TMZ article contains interesting tidbits, but it's TMZ.

I want to believe that Jussie took the police outside and pointed to an obscure camera and was disappointed to learn it was facing the wrong way. I want to believe the police found it odd that he knew about the camera.

But it's TMZ...
 
LTC8K6 said:
Someone mailed that letter. The stamps on it are cancelled. That was a felony.

Plus, you just never know what a GJ will come down with.

Assuming the GJ story is true.

Also assuming the prosecutor isn't using the GJ to prevent charges from being brought. That is, as cover for not bringing charges.
Click to expand...

I wonder if that was the (otherwise inexplicable) reason for involving both brothers? Each could point to the other and say 'I didn't know anything about a letter, mustv'e been him'. There have been cases where a jury couldn't determine exactly who committed a specific crime. Without film of the men attacking JS, they couldn't even prove it was one or the other involved. Can't nail conspiracy down positively, either.
 
JoeMorgue said:
It is rather difficult to come up with a positive or neutral reason one would stage a beating.
Click to expand...

'yo i'm trying to impress a guy who thinks i'm too soft and likes fighters. Need to look like I've been scrapping'

Longshot, but no goofier than the current scenario
 
Thermal said:
I wonder if that was the (otherwise inexplicable) reason for involving both brothers? Each could point to the other and say 'I didn't know anything about a letter, mustv'e been him'. There have been cases where a jury couldn't determine exactly who committed a specific crime. Without film of the men attacking JS, they couldn't even prove it was one or the other involved. Can't nail conspiracy down positively, either.
Click to expand...

I think he intended for this to be a performance on camera.

I think he was stunned to learn that no camera captured it.

Otherwise, I can't see any reason to involve two other people.

I think he also thought there was no way CPD could ever locate the brothers.

If you want to disconnect yourself from purchases or mailing a letter, you only need one other person at most, and you don't really need that if you work it properly.

Involving two other people, and paying them, is guaranteeing failure, imo.
 
LTC8K6 said:
I think he intended for this to be a performance on camera.

I think he was stunned to learn that no camera captured it.

Otherwise, I can't see any reason to involve two other people.

I think he also thought there was no way CPD could ever locate the brothers.

If you want to disconnect yourself from purchases or mailing a letter, you only need one other person at most, and you don't really need that if you work it properly.

Involving two other people, and paying them, is guaranteeing failure, imo.
Click to expand...

Yet another actor learns that directing isn't as easy as it looks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom