• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bitcoin - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
There seems no reason to expect Bitcoin to decline below cost of production.
Gold requires environmental destruction as does Bitcoin.
It will be a little time before the paradigm of infinite supply of cryptos is understood against the finite supply of elements populating the periodic table.

We must be patient, a nudge by vested interests may see bitcoin surge 20 or 30% from here, but this will be met by a wall of escapees. That will be the last hoorah.
 
Don't lie. That's exactly what you did.

Don't insult me. I didn't lie: not highlighting that word doesn't "negate" anything. You already highlighted it yourself. My point, AS YOU WELL KNOW, was to point out that you said history was repeating itself IN ORDER TO support the idea that it will continue to do so. Pretending otherwise IS a lie, by you. Stop projecting.
 
Don't insult me. I didn't lie: not highlighting that word doesn't "negate" anything. You already highlighted it yourself. My point, AS YOU WELL KNOW, was to point out that you said history was repeating itself IN ORDER TO support the idea that it will continue to do so. Pretending otherwise IS a lie, by you. Stop projecting.
The words "so far" specifically exclude a prediction of the future. Therefore, your non-sequitur is exactly a lie. This is because you had to remove the highlighting from these words in order to make your claim.
 
Last edited:
The words "so far" specifically exclude a prediction of the future.

No, they don't. Absolutely not. And I don't believe for a second that you think they do.

This is because you had to remove the highlighting from these words in order to make your claim.

You act as if the highlight made the "so far" impossible to read. Or do you think highlighting the next words "specifically excluded" the "so far"? Don't be ridiculous. A highlight is to put emphasis on something.
 
No, they don't. Absolutely not. And I don't believe for a second that you think they do.
Typical. Unable to deny that the words exist you attempt to reinterpret them to be either meaningless or making a prediction about the future.

You act as if the highlight made the "so far" impossible to read. Or do you think highlighting the next words "specifically excluded" the "so far"? Don't be ridiculous. A highlight is to put emphasis on something.
Exactly. I highlighted the words "so far" so that you wouldn't be able to claim that I was making a prediction. That is why you are tying yourself in knots right now. You had to remove the highlighting and place it elsewhere. But as you mention, the words are still there.
 
Typical. Unable to deny that the words exist you attempt to reinterpret them to be either meaningless or making a prediction about the future.

Again, you know exactly what you were arguing for. There's no reason to bring up that this sort of slump happened before, and then to say that so far history is repeating itself, except to indicate that you predict that it will continue to do so.

Who do you think you're fooling? The only person tying themselves into knots here is you, pretending to be a neutral observer on this topic.
 
I'm not trying to. I said exactly what I mean. You are tying yourself in knots trying to reinterpret the words.

No he's not.

If you meant it to be interpreted differently, you should have phrased it differently.
 
There seems no reason to expect Bitcoin to decline below cost of production.
Gold requires environmental destruction as does Bitcoin.
It will be a little time before the paradigm of infinite supply of cryptos is understood against the finite supply of elements populating the periodic table.

We must be patient, a nudge by vested interests may see bitcoin surge 20 or 30% from here, but this will be met by a wall of escapees. That will be the last hoorah.

This just sounds like the usual line from BTC faithful.

"may see" well, yeah anything is possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom