psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
Don't lie. That's exactly what you did.Wrong.
Don't lie. That's exactly what you did.Wrong.
Don't lie. That's exactly what you did.
The words "so far" specifically exclude a prediction of the future. Therefore, your non-sequitur is exactly a lie. This is because you had to remove the highlighting from these words in order to make your claim.Don't insult me. I didn't lie: not highlighting that word doesn't "negate" anything. You already highlighted it yourself. My point, AS YOU WELL KNOW, was to point out that you said history was repeating itself IN ORDER TO support the idea that it will continue to do so. Pretending otherwise IS a lie, by you. Stop projecting.
The words "so far" specifically exclude a prediction of the future.
This is because you had to remove the highlighting from these words in order to make your claim.
Typical. Unable to deny that the words exist you attempt to reinterpret them to be either meaningless or making a prediction about the future.No, they don't. Absolutely not. And I don't believe for a second that you think they do.
Exactly. I highlighted the words "so far" so that you wouldn't be able to claim that I was making a prediction. That is why you are tying yourself in knots right now. You had to remove the highlighting and place it elsewhere. But as you mention, the words are still there.You act as if the highlight made the "so far" impossible to read. Or do you think highlighting the next words "specifically excluded" the "so far"? Don't be ridiculous. A highlight is to put emphasis on something.
Typical. Unable to deny that the words exist you attempt to reinterpret them to be either meaningless or making a prediction about the future.
I'm not trying to. I said exactly what I mean. You are tying yourself in knots trying to reinterpret the words.You're still not fooling anyone.
I'm not trying to.
I'm not trying to. I said exactly what I mean. You are tying yourself in knots trying to reinterpret the words.
And what magic are you going to perform to make the words "so far" disappear?No he's not.
If you meant it to be interpreted differently, you should have phrased it differently.
And what magic are you going to perform to make the words "so far" disappear?
There seems no reason to expect Bitcoin to decline below cost of production.
Gold requires environmental destruction as does Bitcoin.
It will be a little time before the paradigm of infinite supply of cryptos is understood against the finite supply of elements populating the periodic table.
We must be patient, a nudge by vested interests may see bitcoin surge 20 or 30% from here, but this will be met by a wall of escapees. That will be the last hoorah.
Bitcoin is a lie