Status
Not open for further replies.
First ran into it in this twitter thread. https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/status/1093583224159326209


I'm being cautious about this because I don't want to fall for believing something to be true just because I want it to be true.

Ahh, Mensch. With that said... you really, really don't have to fall for believing something like this to be true just because you want it to be true. I would recommend making a note of the claim and just... letting it lie, for now, unless you want to seriously investigate it. Don't depend on it without further evidence, in other words.

A bit separately and OTly... Perusing Mensch for a little led to this little gem.

#Russia’s media cites Venezuelan media reports that a Russian helicopter “crashed during anti-American exercises” in #Venezuela.

It's not often that I am happy about vehicles "crashing," but this is a good example of a case where I am.
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1093635620461780992

WOW: Per new court filing, KONSTANTIN KILIMNIK, the Russia intelligence-linked PAUL MANAFORT deputy, was in DC for TRUMP's inauguration, & met with Manafort about a Russia-Ukraine peace plan that we know envisioned a role for Russia-aligned former Ukrainian president YANUKOVYCH.

That's the first post in a thread dissecting the relevant parts of the filing. Also perhaps worth noting is one of the replies: https://twitter.com/TedGenoways/status/1093641749682155523

An observation... The redacted phrase is a location, not a date. As noted below, it could be something like "on a jet." Courier is a monotype—meaning all characters all equal width. And, well, one thing that would fit that black space is "Air Force One."

Documents embedded in every tweet.
 
Trump Tweets

Not only did Senator Burr’s Committee find No Collusion by the Trump Campaign and Russia, it’s important because they interviewed 200 witnesses and 300,000 pages of documents, & the Committee has direct access to intelligence information that’s Classified.
@GreggJarrett
 
I'd be very careful when dealing with Louise Mensch and her "sources". She has a bit of a tinfoil hat streak, to the point that she once claimed that the Marshall of the Supreme Court had warned Trump that an impeachment case against him had begun. Which might have come as a bit of a surprise to the House, given that they're usually the ones doing that.

She also "reported" that Steve Bannon had received a death sentence. Don't worry, she took no pleasure in it because she's pro-life. :boggled:
 
Trump Tweets

Now we find out that Adam Schiff was spending time together in Aspen with Glenn Simpson of GPS Fusion, who wrote the fake and discredited Dossier, even though Simpson was testifying before Schiff. John Solomon of
@thehill
 
Trump Tweets

The mainstream media has refused to cover the fact that the head of the VERY important Senate Intelligence Committee, after two years of intensive study and access to Intelligence that only they could get, just stated that they have found NO COLLUSION between “Trump” & Russia....

...It is all a GIANT AND ILLEGAL HOAX, developed long before the election itself, but used as an excuse by the Democrats as to why Crooked Hillary Clinton lost the Election! Someday the Fake News Media will turn honest & report that Donald J. Trump was actually a GREAT Candidate!
 
If it was developed before the election why would they wait until after Trump won to perpetrate it. Trump makes no sense at all.
 
first post: ad hominem

You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means.

third: rule of so
fourth: rule of so.

Stop trying to make fetch happen. It's not going to happen.

stopped reading there.

Good-oh.

Seth is a political grifter.

Yes, this is the new(ish) way to thoughtlessly dismiss people who say things that contradict the narrative the right-wing would like pushed.
 
You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means.

It is odd, plenty of people have made that claim, but literally none have ever backed it up. Just like you didn't there.

Seth is a charlatan, as i have explained and shown repeatedly. case in point, for some bizarre reason you have chosen to inflict upon the readers of this thread Seth's unrelentingly biased spin on an article rather than the actual honest to god article. Seth then inflicts on his innocent and bluepilled readers the grossly unfounded claim that the investigation has "shocked the Senate." That is a spectacularly idiotic opinion that is directly at odds with the actual article that he is purporting to interpret for his gullible readers.

Seth is a charlatan, gifter and deliberate and admitted prevaricator.

ladies and gentlemen here is the actual source article, you don't need Seth to chew it up and dribble it into your gaping maws like birds in a nest:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/richar...e-committees-russia-investigation-2-years-on/
 
When it comes to spotting fallacies, you are literally the worst person I've ever seen.

Lol, you keep saying that but have never once shown that. You sure as **** didn't here, because day that ends in "y."

It is fine. remember that time you said it wasn't a fallacy because someone "wasn't making an argument"? That blew warm breezes up my kilt! So funny!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom