Mueller Investigation pt4

[plague311]

Hey! What happened to the very interesting things that you were going to show us?



Was the interesting thing the fact that there "isn't anything there"? Because that is not interesting at all.



protip: look at the actual letter...



Still looking forward to you regaling us.

It's interesting to everyone but you. You're still off on this red herring though? Why should I look at the letter again? I've seen it, yes? Point out the evidence TBD. Words mean nothing if they aren't supported by evidence.

It's fine though, keep it up. I think you're doing a great job.

 

[The Big Dog]

Just wait until we see TBD break down this metadata for me. I have some very interesting things to show him.

It's interesting to everyone but you. You're still off on this red herring though? Why should I look at the letter again? I've seen it, yes? Point out the evidence TBD. Words mean nothing if they aren't supported by evidence.

It's fine though, keep it up. I think you're doing a great job.

Hmmm....

You said you had interesting things to show me, and I am waiting with BELLS on for you regale with “interesting things.”

 

[Segnosaur]

Drums fingers expectantly about how CNN got an unfiled copy of the sealed indictment at 6 am...

Gateway pundit is not credible.

Its also been printed in Infowars. If you can't believe a source that suggests there is a secret plot to turn frogs gay, who can you believe?

I did a quick search to see if I could find any other source or independent confirmation for that story. (You figure at least fox news would be all over it.) But apart from the sources better known for conspiracy theories (Gateway Pundit, Infowars) and Russia Today (Not exactly known to be impartial), I haven't found anyone else reporting on it.

So what do we have? A story that:
1) Seems to appear only in sources of questionable credibility
2) Publishing a letter that was written by Stone's lawyer (who certainly would have a vested interest in trying to damage the credibility of the Mueller investigation)
3) publishing information based on computer file metadata, the exact origin of which is not yet known (and, it should be noted, could easily be changed)

ETA: By the way, what exactly do people think about how quoting the Gateway Pundit (a source about as credible as Infowars) affects the credibility of posters who use it as a reference?

 

[Norman Alexander]

Turn frogs gay??! What the hell??

 

[Norman Alexander]

[dup]

 

[chrispy]

Turn frogs gay??! What the hell??

What kind of condoms does a gay frog use? "Ribb-Ed"

 

[dasmiller]

Turn frogs gay??! What the hell??

Starting at about 10:10 in this video, particularly a short rant at 10:55. But the whole thing is good entertaining.

 

[Stacko]

Hmm, we've arrived at a new query. Is the stupidest man on the internet Jim Hoft or the man that believes Jim Hoft and shares it?

 

[Norman Alexander]

Starting at about 10:10 in this video, particularly a short rant at 10:55. But the whole thing is good entertaining.

Did you HAVE to? I was trying to eat dinner. Thanks a bunch.

 

[smartcooky]

ETA: By the way, what exactly do people think about how quoting the Gateway Pundit (a source about as credible as Infowars) affects the credibility of posters who use it as a reference?

I find it as credible as quoting

kennedyandking.com on anything to do with JFK,
AE911truth.org for anything to do with the 9/11 attacks, and
Bart Sibrel for anything to do with the Apollo lunar missions


i.e, not at all credible.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

It's being reported that a Russian-born lobbyist who attended the Trump Tower meeting received a large number of suspicious payments, including from Russian nationals invested in overturning the Magnitsky Act and an American with close ties to the Trump campaign

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

It's being reported that a Russian-born lobbyist who attended the Trump Tower meeting received a large number of suspicious payments, including from Russian nationals invested in overturning the Magnitsky Act and an American with close ties to the Trump campaign

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1092594850481037313

If Rinat Akhmetshin is under renewed scrutiny in the Mueller probe, this tidbit from pg. 273 of PROOF OF COLLUSION may be of interest: Akhmetshin was the *one* person Trump Jr. left out of his account of the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, despite a good reason for *not* doing so.

Quote embedded in tweet.

 

[The Big Dog]

Oy vey. Thr actual letter setting the time line is actually embedded in the article...

Oof. Smdh.

 

[beren]

Oy vey. Thr actual letter setting the time line is actually embedded in the article...

Oof. Smdh.

Yes, yes it is.
Not sure why you think that matters or that it proves anything.
Feel free to explain why we should view it as anything more than a self-serving statement. (Or at least a client-serving statement.)
That Roger Stone, he sure has a reputation for playing it straight and never doing dirty tricks, amiright? Hell, he will tell you do himself. Totally trustable.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Oy vey. Thr actual letter setting the time line is actually embedded in the article...

Oof. Smdh.

And I will wait until a more legitimate source confirms the information. There is no rush.

 

[varwoche]

Yes, yes it is.
Not sure why you think that matters or that it proves anything.
Feel free to explain why we should view it as anything more than a self-serving statement. (Or at least a client-serving statement.)
That Roger Stone, he sure has a reputation for playing it straight and never doing dirty tricks, amiright? Hell, he will tell you do himself. Totally trustable.

Indeed. We are being asked to trust Roger Stone, Roger Stone's attorneys, and a right-wing website that is raising money for Roger Stone.

It reeks of impartiality!

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Buzzfeed article containing internal Trump Organisation documents from the time of the Trump Tower Moscow deal

Short Seth Abramson thread on the article

 

[quadraginta]

It's being reported that a Russian-born lobbyist who attended the Trump Tower meeting received a large number of suspicious payments, including from Russian nationals invested in overturning the Magnitsky Act and an American with close ties to the Trump campaign

Half a million dollars?

Pffft. Chicken feed.

That's the kind of money you'd tip a covfefe boy with.

 

[plague311]

Oy vey. Thr actual letter setting the time line is actually embedded in the article...

Oof. Smdh.

I'm claiming that the letter in the ******** article is ********. It's backed by absolutely no factual information at all. Including that "metadata" nonsense.

You've been asked repeatedly to prove what you say and you haven't. Anyone can draw a conclusion as to what that means. You've bent over backwards to avoid answering anyone at all.

Show me the credible evidence big dog.

 

[The Big Dog]

I'm claiming that the letter in the ******** article is ********. It's backed by absolutely no factual information at all. Including that "metadata" nonsense.

You've been asked repeatedly to prove what you say and you haven't. Anyone can draw a conclusion as to what that means. You've bent over backwards to avoid answering anyone at all.

Show me the credible evidence big dog.

The credible evidence? you mean the actual letter that is in the actual link that you actually read already?

Listen, we get that you are going to hand wave away the actual letter, but don't blow smoke up our skirts pretending that you are interested in evidence.

Now, as for the rest of us? I think i can speak for everyone here when i said we are thirsty for those "very interesting things to show him."

tick tock