Mueller Investigation pt4

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Big Dog said:
Your fallacy is tu quoque.

Let me tell you a tale of a time when the JREF forum was considered a center of critical thinking, and where people would not permit their political prejudices to get in the way of calling out their fellow travelers who perpetrated fallacious arguments such as this one. That forum is dead in many more ways than one.

Sad.
Click to expand...

Thinking that such a time existed on this forum is your fantasy.

There is, no doubt, no evidence at all of your political prejudices in evidence on this forum. Your posts are all strictly rational and neutral. :rolleyes:
 
Crossbow said:
Another fine example of total hypocrisy in action.

When it was Hillary Clinton who was facing legal trouble, then 'The Big Dog' was all for her being treated like a criminal.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11241821#post11241821

And now, when it is another Trump lackey who is in legal trouble, all of sudden 'The Big Dog' is terribly concerned about him being treated like criminal.
Click to expand...

All part of the larger hilarity of conservatives being concerned about old rich white guys being treated fairly by the judicial system in a country with the highest per capita prison population in the world, a disproportionate number of that population being minorities.
 
Steve said:
Thinking that such a time existed on this forum is your fantasy.

There is, no doubt, no evidence at all of your political prejudices in evidence on this forum. Your posts are all strictly rational and neutral. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

This forum?

But no, not all of my posts, some are hilarious.

Although not as funny as the orgy of fallacies in this thread.
 
The Big Dog said:
No. One expects that one would spend time thinking about things.

A poster made up out of whole cloth an excuse that even the CNN did not try to make. CNN’s own excuse contradicts that assertion (as does other evidence), that precludes that made up excuse but does not prove that CNN’s excuse was correct.

Let me show this using a simple analogy.

Perp: I killed him in self defense.
Wrong excuse maker: it could have been someone else.
Critical thinkers: the fact he claimed he killed the person precludes the claim that it was someone else, but does NOT PROVE he did it in self defense.
Click to expand...

This is why theprestige won't let us use analogies.
 
Molinaro said:
If people are going to question how those making the arrest were geared up, they should talk about the correct group of people who were making the arrest.

That was the only point I intended to make.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.
 
The Big Dog said:
This forum?

But no, not all of my posts, some are hilarious.
Although not as funny as the orgy of fallacies in this thread.
Click to expand...

Yes, this forum - ISF, formerly JREF.

Many of your posts are hilarious, as I noted up-thread. Unfortunately for yourself they are seldom the posts where humor was intended.
 
smartcooky said:
... and of course, absolutely no-one on any news organization's staff, anywhere has, or has ever had, a police radio receiver
Click to expand...

Why CNN was there doesn't matter one bit. This is just another Trumpanzee tactic to distract from the real story, in this case, Roger Stone's indictment.
 
The Big Dog said:
Let me tell you a tale of a time when the JREF forum was considered a center of critical thinking, and where people would not permit their political prejudices to get in the way of calling out their fellow travelers who perpetrated fallacious arguments such as this one. That forum is dead in many more ways than one.

Sad.
Click to expand...


Well. if you don't like this forum, the gay-bashing, Muslim-bashing, racist, right wing Catholic echo-chamber is thataway-------------------------->
 
thaiboxerken said:
Why CNN was there doesn't matter one bit. This is just another Trumpanzee tactic to distract from the real story, in this case, Roger Stone's indictment.
Click to expand...

Of course it does, although I am delighted that you are deliberately reducing your political opponents to animals.

This is the type of threads that shine out like a shaft of gold when all around is dark.
 
The Big Dog said:
Of course it does, although I am delighted that you are deliberately reducing your political opponents to animals.

This is the type of threads that shine out like a shaft of gold when all around is dark.
Click to expand...

Everyone has to be perfect, but you, right? The myriad of insulting names you've made up for Hillary, the entire other thread and how you're referred to Nathan Phillips, etc. What excuses do you make for yourself? You're the worst "nick name maker" of them all. Why do you give yourself a pass?

This is the problem with trying to take your posts seriously. You always have another post that completely contradicts whatever fake ass outrage your feigning today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom