• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Where will Trump be two years from now?

Where will Trump be two years from now?

  • Total voters
    112
Stacyhs said:
Dammit! That was expensive champagne you just made me spit out my nose.
(shakes fist in the air)
Click to expand...

12:00 am, drinking champagne on New Years, and you're checking in here? ;)

This forum is definitely a sick addiction because I know I wouldn't still be here if it weren't. I hate this place!
 
acbytesla said:
Guessing seems kind of ridiculous to me since it seems as if the one thing we can count on with Trump is the unexpected.
Click to expand...
Yep, predictions regarding Trump seem even more futile than most predictions.

Still, I'm inclined to believe that enough evidence will be found to persuade Republicans that they have had enough of Trump and that continued support of Mr. Looney Tunes is not in their best interest.

But unless there is proof of criminality that points directly at Trump beyond obstruction, I think he will simply be voted out of office.
Click to expand...

I give it 60% chance he does not win re-election some of that 60% because there's a chance he won't run again and some of it because he may just not win if he does. I highly doubt he will be impeach and its even less probably that he will be convicted if impeached.

That being said, if Mueller finds solid evidence that Trump committed a crime during the campaign, my above prediction is totally wrong.


I think that most of the republican leadership knows that trump is poison in the long run but to mix metaphors, they have a tiger by the tale and if they let go, all his supporters are going to eat them for lunch.

Side note, I'd probably be more willing to vote for him now than prior to his election. He hasn't been nearly as bad as I expected. We aren't in recession yet and we aren't in any new wars. The new wars thing is a vast improvement over his last two predecessors.
 
Last edited:
Impeachment is removal from office. It is not a legal matter, a state matter to decide if the president is unfit. He has been unfit from Day 1.
 
Tero said:
Impeachment is removal from office. It is not a legal matter, a state matter to decide if the president is unfit. He has been unfit from Day 1.
Click to expand...

This is oddly wrong. Impeachment is the process by which a legislature indicts or levels charges against a public official. If impeached, the official may be removed from office but impeachment is not actually removal from office. As shown by the fact that Bill Clinton was impeached however, he remained in office afterward.
 
No Lee Harvey Oswald option? Planet X, where wishful thinkers go for recovery.

Or quite possibly reelected. The Democrats are likely to soon alienate those who've tentatively come over, being the loose thinkers they are. No counter-punching skills, sloppy optics, bad teamwork, rarely on point, wishful and impractical thinking... everything you might expect in genuine democracy... just not good enough to beat a Goebbels 2.0 operation.
 
ahhell said:
This is oddly wrong. Impeachment is the process by which a legislature indicts or levels charges against a public official. If impeached, the official may be removed from office but impeachment is not actually removal from office. As shown by the fact that Bill Clinton was impeached however, he remained in office afterward.
Click to expand...

Its whatever the body doing the impeachment decides.

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job (as president) in this constitutional republic if this body determines your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” Graham says of Clinton in the nearly 20-year-old clip.

https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article217126395.html

I wonder if he'll hold to those words.
 
mgidm86 said:
12:00 am, drinking champagne on New Years, and you're checking in here? ;)

This forum is definitely a sick addiction because I know I wouldn't still be here if it weren't. I hate this place!
Click to expand...

I gave up partying on NY's Eve years ago. Too many damn drunks on the road and yes, this place is addictive.
 
lobosrul5 said:
Its whatever the body doing the impeachment decides.

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job (as president) in this constitutional republic if this body determines your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” Graham says of Clinton in the nearly 20-year-old clip.

https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article217126395.html

I wonder if he'll hold to those words.
Click to expand...

Put the bong down and step away.:D
 
mgidm86 said:
12:00 am, drinking champagne on New Years, and you're checking in here? ;)

This forum is definitely a sick addiction because I know I wouldn't still be here if it weren't. I hate this place!
Click to expand...

Thanks for narrowing down your own location for us. I'll pass that along to the Deep State. :rolleyes:

Do you know that Stacyhs is in your time zone? Do you know that the software reports posts in "your" time and not the local time of the poster? Do you know that I'm posting from tomorrow?
 
lobosrul5 said:
Its whatever the body doing the impeachment decides.

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job (as president) in this constitutional republic if this body determines your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” Graham says of Clinton in the nearly 20-year-old clip.

https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article217126395.html

I wonder if he'll hold to those words.
Click to expand...

Someone on the internet disagrees with me so....

Also wrong. A president or any other official of the federal government can be impeached for any reason the house deems, true. Then the Senate gets to decide whether that official is removed from office. In the US federal government this can be done for any reason as you suggest, rules are probably more clear in other jurisdiction but the congress could clarify what sort of behavior warrants or does not warrant impeachment via law by defining "high crimes and misdemeanors". The impeachment is still just the leveling of charges not removal from office as was suggested in the post I was responding too earlier.

Its a pedantic point, I admit. Impeachment is to removal from office as indictment is to conviction.

Tero said:
Impeachment is removal from office. It is not a legal matter, a state matter to decide if the president is unfit. He has been unfit from Day 1.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
casebro said:
And if his term gets shortened it will be because he steps down, Nixon style. And he won't be in prison in two years, not with the lawyers his money will buy. 5 years maybe.
Click to expand...

It's not about his money (well...) but his judgement. He'll pick a lawyer who doesn't have the spine to tell him the most important piece of advice "Just shut the F up..." I mean look at his current history with the lawyers, I'd hardly dexcribe them as winners
 
Mongrel said:
It's not about his money (well...) but his judgement. He'll pick a lawyer who doesn't have the spine to tell him the most important piece of advice "Just shut the F up..." I mean look at his current history with the lawyers, I'd hardly dexcribe them as winners
Click to expand...

Are you actually suggesting that Giuliani isn't a winner?:jaw-dropp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom