• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just a step by step progress. Better first test with existing equipment, like a spot welder and easily available solar cells. Later build dedicated hw to feed 10000A at very low voltage using supercaps etc. and CPV panels to get direct electrical output, that could in next step be used for all input electricity plus some more. This latest PV setup is quite different than earlier, as they have invented better way.
 
Last edited:
Just a step by step progress. Better first test with existing equipment, like a spot welder and easily available solar cells. Later build dedicated hw to feed 10000A at very low voltage using supercaps etc. and CPV panels to get direct electrical output, that could in next step be used for all input electricity plus some more. This latest PV setup is quite different than earlier, as they have invented better way.
They still haven't invented more energy out than energy in. It's because no hydrinos. Meaning nothing to see here but just a fancier more expensive failure.
 
Just a step by step progress. Better first test with existing equipment, like a spot welder and easily available solar cells. Later build dedicated hw to feed 10000A at very low voltage using supercaps etc. and CPV panels to get direct electrical output, that could in next step be used for all input electricity plus some more. This latest PV setup is quite different than earlier, as they have invented better way.

Yeeeeeeaaaah, two weeks of 'progress' stretched over 30 years................
 
As of today, we have to wait a mere 31 (61) days before the world has concrete, independent, evidence of the existence of a hydrino-powered generator. According to markie (though he may be having some doubts). And according to new to the ISF tlp, there will be no more predictions (but see below).

Well, we all know - and that includes markie, optiongeek, and tlp - that there will be no working prototype hyrdrino-based generators shipped from NJ to independent testing labs, by 2 March, 2019.

But when will the scam end?

Suppose Mills were to depart, suddenly; is there anyone among his acolytes who will pick up the torch? Is it reasonable to expect that markie, optiongeek, and/or tlp will take over?

I don't know how old Mills is, but assume he was 30 when he started this scam, 30 years ago. He would be now entering a period when illnesses and deaths start to rise, perhaps exponentially.

Of course, he will not be felled by cancer, as he has cabinets full of revolutionary cancer drugs ... though perhaps all the hydrinos and dihydrinos he's been breathing will cause a variant of lung cancer that his miracle drugs won't work on.

Alzheimer's is unlikely to strike for another decade or two, so the scam will likely continue well after I'm gone, if Mills is side-lined by Alzheimer's.

So a heart attack and/or stroke seem the most likely, for now (I assume we can rule out suicide or homicide). Though a car crash remains a distinct possibility, or even being thrown from a horse? :p

What do you think? How, and when, will this scam end?
As of today, we have to wait a mere 30 (60) days before the world has concrete, independent, evidence of the existence of a hydrino-powered generator. According to markie (though he may be having some doubts). And according to new to the ISF tlp, there will be no more predictions.

First, a welcome to davefoc, who started the 2010 thread on this topic that I covered earlier.

My plans for what to write today are torn up. Yesterday, Mills fan tlp posted something that surprised, and even shocked, some of us (well, me at least).

What is is? A link to a blog post by Brett Holverstott, dated March 15, 2017. According to several Mills fans, Brett Holverstott is very close to Mills, perhaps the best source of info on BLP, Mills, etc there is, other than BLP's own statements propaganda.

Here's part of what Holverstott wrote, in the blog post (I am certainly not the first to post this): "They [BLP] plan to deploy units for field testing sites this year. Let's suppose it doesn't happen until next year." :jaw-dropp :jaw-dropp :jaw-dropp

So, here is something essentially an equivalent to a firm prediction, made by ISF member tlp, in direct contradiction of what she posted earlier. Its status, today, is (-2) days before the world has concrete, independent, evidence of the existence of a hydrino-powered generator. (NYD was a holiday).
 
But nobody has read Holverstotts book?

<snip>
To add to what's been posted already, if you had taken the time to read through this thread, and its predecessors, you'd have come across posts by ISF member Reality Check (haven't seen him in a while, hope he's OK).

He is certainly not the only ISF member who has read both Holverstott's and Mills' books, nor the only one to point out, um, shortcomings, but he's also spent countless hours writing detailed comments on the contents, directly rebutting some of the nonsense in them (sure, he sometimes made mistakes - don't we all? - mistakes which he quickly acknowledged when pointed out, and corrected them).
 
Just a step by step progress. Better first test with existing equipment, like a spot welder and easily available solar cells. Later build dedicated hw to feed 10000A at very low voltage using supercaps etc. and CPV panels to get direct electrical output, that could in next step be used for all input electricity plus some more. This latest PV setup is quite different than earlier, as they have invented better way.

On what evidence do you base this?
 
Just a step by step progress. Better first test with existing equipment, like a spot welder and easily available solar cells. Later build dedicated hw to feed 10000A at very low voltage using supercaps etc. and CPV panels to get direct electrical output, that could in next step be used for all input electricity plus some more. This latest PV setup is quite different than earlier, as they have invented better way.

This sounds like tried and tested BLP stuff: concentrate on solving all the already solved problems, find some reason for declaring them unsolved, cite this as a fatal flaw in the latest approach to extracting useful energy from the hydrino reaction, and then propose a different approach using already known solutions which will be subjected to the same treatment. It gives the illusion of progress towards a working hydrino energy generator, while avoiding ever having to either demonstrate that the hydrino reaction is real or release an actual product.

Dave
 
Autocorrect got me. My post should read molybdenum container and not 'jolt,'

Was too late to edit that.

I do weld. I am familiar with burning holes in stuff I should not be.
 
....but that would be the real point of his showing up - to relentless go over the same stuff, over and over again to keep alive the 'possibility'.

That is all the Millsites can do and that is why they constantly cry for the world to accept the possibility that 30 years of abject failure, scam like actions, lies....they are really just the necessary steps to.....................

hydrino nirvana.................lol
Indeed.

This is, as far as I can tell, completely consistent with what's been happening this this thread, particularly recently (though you can see the same thing in this thread's predecessors too).

One obvious sign: newbie Mills fans seem to exhibit no evidence of having read older posts in this thread, posts highly relevant to what they themselves write, even posts just a page or so earlier! :eye-poppi

Maybe tlp (in particular) and optiongeek can explain to us how their posts are distinct from trolling? :p
 
Thermal heater version is developed at the same time. They may even have an internal competition between the teams which is ready first:
- heater with water flow or tank calorimeter
- CPV electric output at least just enough to supply all input electricity
Both with easily measurable hydrogen feeding
 
Thermal heater version is developed at the same time. They may even have an internal competition between the teams which is ready first:
- heater with water flow or tank calorimeter
- CPV electric output at least just enough to supply all input electricity
Both with easily measurable hydrogen feeding


The water heater approach has a big advantage. You see it heating water, and it's not so easy to tell if it's heating the water more, less, or the same as a simple electric water heater running directly off the same input power. (Just like with the recent videos. Look, it's getting hot! But how does the heat output compare with the power going in? Don't ask, nobody knows.) But with a generator, it's too easy to tell when it can't run off of its own output.
 

OK

W0nCm3B.jpg


This proves what now? Mills can glue crap to mom's teapot?
 
Just a step by step progress. Better first test with existing equipment, like a spot welder and easily available solar cells. Later build dedicated hw to feed 10000A at very low voltage using supercaps etc. and CPV panels to get direct electrical output, that could in next step be used for all input electricity plus some more. This latest PV setup is quite different than earlier, as they have invented better way.
Have you ever heard of the exotic technology called "copper tubing"? I know most people won't have heard about such esoteric materials that are very rare and incredibly expensive but with a few metres of that around one of his generators and I bet some really, really clever person could find a way of converting the heat energy into another kind of energy such as mechanical or electricity.

Yeah I know imagine using steam as a power source, I know it sounds pretty amazing but I've heard claims that it can be used in such a way. Sadly can't find James Watts Web page to provide a link to his crazy ideas.
 
Thermal heater version is developed at the same time. They may even have an internal competition between the teams which is ready first:
- heater with water flow or tank calorimeter
- CPV electric output at least just enough to supply all input electricity
Both with easily measurable hydrogen feeding

In 1991/92 they just needed a heat exchanger for the thermal heater version.

The heater part was working fine for long periods. They had lots and lots of data from months long test runs back in the early 1990s.

Yet today you still talk as if such a device is not finished yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom