What do you all think should be done about the border situation? I see a lot of complaints and no solutions.
Process them and set them free in our country until their court date two years later, many of which never appear? I think that's what we do now. I think that's a terrible idea.
I'm not sure that's true:
Politifact said:
According to Justice Department data from the last five available years, around 60 to 75 percent of non-detained migrants have attended their immigration court proceedings. That’s determined by subtracting the percentage of judgments entered against migrants in their absence (known as an in absentia ruling) from total judgments entered.
https://www.politifact.com/punditfa...ty-undocumented-immigrants-show-court-data-s/
That's the situation for all types of undocumented immigrants, but if you are talking about Asylum Seekers, the numbers are different. From the same link:
Politifact said:
Before the Trump administration ended the program in June, participants had a 100 percent attendance record at court hearings. They also had a 99 percent rate of check-ins and appointments with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to a Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General report.
"According to ICE, overall program compliance for all five regions is an average of 99 percent for ICE check-ins and appointments, as well as 100 percent attendance at court hearings," the report said. "Since the inception of FCMP, 23 out of 954 participants (2 percent) were reported as absconders."
Is that how other countries do it? Just let people walk in and do whatever they please?
Speaking as an Australian, I can only say that I disagree strongly with my government's policy of detaining asylum seekers in off-shore detention centres. I think it is inhumane and brutal. I also think it is hypocritical for a nation which was founded on and thrived for centuries on a basis of immigration (forced or otherwise) to now be so hostile towards the concept.
If we did "let people walk in and do as they please" I wouldn't see that as a problem. As history has shown, when immigrants do that the economy expands, the culture is enriched and the society as a whole benefits in many ways both tangible and intangible.
Should we deny them entry in the first place and forcibly remove them if they get through?
No.
Should we let in everyone who wants to be here and let them stay?
Yes.
What is your solution for this? More (maybe better) detention centers? Do we need to build 4-star hotels so we can make it as easy as possible for people to take advantage of us?
How about not detaining them at all? How about letting them find work legally, letting them start businesses etc and having them pay taxes?
While you're at it, you could fix the health-care system and stop all those corporations and billionaires dodging tax...
Why is it our fault that these people have no place to go when they get here?
See the Statue of Liberty and about a hundred years of pro-US propaganda exported to the rest of the world in the form of pop-culture entertainment.
The US created the demand by advertising itself as the greatest damn place on the planet for at least a century. Now it's up to you guys to either prove it, or shut the hell up.
If you guys are so worried about a few thousand impoverished Central Americans destroying your "land of the free and home of the brave" then there is something very wrong there.
Again, what do other countries do? Because we are being made out to be evil scum for doing one of the most basic things a country can do - secure its borders.
As noted above, my country has a despicable, evil and scummy policy of locking up vulnerable people on islands. I don't like it.
Our problem is that most people don't want to go to any other country so we get them all. You have no idea what the problem is like here because we are the only country with it at such a constant scale.
I think people in the EU might disagree with you:
euronews said:
In 2017, the number of non-EU citizens who were refused entry to the EU rose by 13% compared to the previous year.
Over 439,000 non-EU citizens were refused entry into the EU at one of its external borders.
Spain refused almost half of all non-EU citizens who were refused entry into the EU last year (203,025 out of 439,505), followed by France (86,320) and Poland (38.660).
The migrant crisis has led to a widening political divide in Europe, especially between Italy, where most migrants first enter the EU, and Germany, the places where most migrants attempt to travel due to the passport-free Schengen area.
https://www.euronews.com/2018/07/09...creases-while-number-of-those-kicked-out-rise
Plenty of people trying to get into Europe.
Anyone have a plan? My plan was mentioned above: "Deny them entry in the first place and forcibly remove them if they get through"
I'm tempted to ask how your family got into America and whether or not they would have been forcibly removed if this policy had been in place at the time... But I won't.
I'll just point out that the US was founded by immigrants and their families. It grew in size and prosperity through the efforts of immigrants. Its strength and diversity is a product of immigration and the fact that it now fears immigration is a terrible shame.
Have a nice day...