Moderated Trump announces new concentration camps

...

No. The administration is not partly responsible for the father's decision. That is asinine.

That entire quote/article is bullcrap. All these rules we are supposed to abide by so that hundreds and thousands of people can attempt to break into our country illegally and safely. That's pretty back-asswards.

"Oh my gawd! Look at the conditions! No Playstation!!" How the hell is that our fault? He brought her across a desert! People want us to have border patrol, water fountains and amenities at every corner? I thought we wanted to abolish ICE and de-fund this stuff. Which is it?

Many of these people are crossing multiple countries to get to the USA. That is not how asylum works. These people refused help from Mexico when it was offered. No, they want to come here.

The only fault of ours is that we let the problem get so big because we've done nothing about it. These poor people are just pawns in a big political game.

They are being exploited by everyone: those who promise asylum illegally, those who hire them, those who give them driver's licenses, and those of you who want your cheap veggies. You're being conned. Wake up people.

Adorable.
 
Adorable.

Arrogance works when you have nothing worthy to say I guess?

He's saying that Border Patrol did everything they could to help and that he has "no complaints" about their treatment. He does, however, dispute their statement that the girl hadn't had food or water for days before the arrest and insists that she was kept fed and hydrated the entire time.

Once again, people exploiting them for a good story, facts be damned.
 
Anecdote: I live in San Diego. I go through the highway check points several times a month, and last year crossed into Tecate and back seven times for cheap dentistry. EVERY agent I see is Hispanic. I doubt they laugh at their "cousins" in distress. But they seemed to enjoy hassling the ethnic minority white guy.
 
If what you're claiming is that ICE agents are largely Hispanic in appearance and are therefore sympathetic to the illegals, some may be but most are not. I don't know any Hispanics that are pro-illegals, they are actually quite vocally against it.

Law enforcement officers are, by and large, committed to doing their jobs and enforcing laws. Do you think these Hispanic officers are going to turn a blind eye to people sneaking into the country? I do not.

If they don't like you it may not be your skin color. In fact that seems like an odd thing to assume.
 
Because they're Batman villains! Or because they weren't prescribed to her.

Because they're ******* petty authoritarians, cheered on by a coalition of ********, racists, useful idiots, and cynical political operators leveraging fear.

It doesn't take people as crazy as Batman villains to do some truly deplorable things when the system is allowing, or in this case encouraging, such evil.

It was not because they weren't prescribed to her. That's an asspull. The simple reason is these thugs believe their cruelty is justified, and thus will abuse any power given to them in order to perpetrate cruelty.
 
It was not because they weren't prescribed to her. That's an asspull. The simple reason is these thugs believe their cruelty is justified, and thus will abuse any power given to them in order to perpetrate cruelty.

Even if the reason they pulled them was a lack of prescription, if they're taking them then they, at least, think something's wrong. Get a freaking doctor. It's not rocket science. It really isn't.

Heck, when I was deployed to Iraq, we even got doctors for our detainees if they showed signs of illness. On the same day, even.
 
Even if the reason they pulled them was a lack of prescription, if they're taking them then they, at least, think something's wrong. Get a freaking doctor. It's not rocket science. It really isn't.

Heck, when I was deployed to Iraq, we even got doctors for our detainees if they showed signs of illness. On the same day, even.
But then there was Abu Ghraib. At some point incompetence crosses over into malice.
 
What do you all think should be done about the border situation? I see a lot of complaints and no solutions.

Process them and set them free in our country until their court date two years later, many of which never appear? I think that's what we do now. I think that's a terrible idea.

Is that how other countries do it? Just let people walk in and do whatever they please?

Should we deny them entry in the first place and forcibly remove them if they get through?

Should we let in everyone who wants to be here and let them stay?

What is your solution for this? More (maybe better) detention centers? Do we need to build 4-star hotels so we can make it as easy as possible for people to take advantage of us?

Why is it our fault that these people have no place to go when they get here?

Again, what do other countries do? Because we are being made out to be evil scum for doing one of the most basic things a country can do - secure its borders.

Our problem is that most people don't want to go to any other country so we get them all. You have no idea what the problem is like here because we are the only country with it at such a constant scale.

Anyone have a plan? My plan was mentioned above: "Deny them entry in the first place and forcibly remove them if they get through"
 
Last edited:
Even if the reason they pulled them was a lack of prescription, if they're taking them then they, at least, think something's wrong. Get a freaking doctor. It's not rocket science. It really isn't.

Heck, when I was deployed to Iraq, we even got doctors for our detainees if they showed signs of illness. On the same day, even.

This isn't possible. I've been told endlessly by the brilliant, not-at-all-ignorant European skeptics on this forum that you can't see a doctor in the US unless you pay for it.
 
What do you all think should be done about the border situation? I see a lot of complaints and no solutions.

Process them and set them free in our country until their court date two years later, many of which never appear? I think that's what we do now. I think that's a terrible idea.

I'm not sure that's true:
Politifact said:
According to Justice Department data from the last five available years, around 60 to 75 percent of non-detained migrants have attended their immigration court proceedings. That’s determined by subtracting the percentage of judgments entered against migrants in their absence (known as an in absentia ruling) from total judgments entered.
https://www.politifact.com/punditfa...ty-undocumented-immigrants-show-court-data-s/
That's the situation for all types of undocumented immigrants, but if you are talking about Asylum Seekers, the numbers are different. From the same link:
Politifact said:
Before the Trump administration ended the program in June, participants had a 100 percent attendance record at court hearings. They also had a 99 percent rate of check-ins and appointments with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to a Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General report.

"According to ICE, overall program compliance for all five regions is an average of 99 percent for ICE check-ins and appointments, as well as 100 percent attendance at court hearings," the report said. "Since the inception of FCMP, 23 out of 954 participants (2 percent) were reported as absconders."
Is that how other countries do it? Just let people walk in and do whatever they please?

Speaking as an Australian, I can only say that I disagree strongly with my government's policy of detaining asylum seekers in off-shore detention centres. I think it is inhumane and brutal. I also think it is hypocritical for a nation which was founded on and thrived for centuries on a basis of immigration (forced or otherwise) to now be so hostile towards the concept.

If we did "let people walk in and do as they please" I wouldn't see that as a problem. As history has shown, when immigrants do that the economy expands, the culture is enriched and the society as a whole benefits in many ways both tangible and intangible.

Should we deny them entry in the first place and forcibly remove them if they get through?
No.

Should we let in everyone who wants to be here and let them stay?
Yes.
What is your solution for this? More (maybe better) detention centers? Do we need to build 4-star hotels so we can make it as easy as possible for people to take advantage of us?
How about not detaining them at all? How about letting them find work legally, letting them start businesses etc and having them pay taxes?

While you're at it, you could fix the health-care system and stop all those corporations and billionaires dodging tax...:p

Why is it our fault that these people have no place to go when they get here?
See the Statue of Liberty and about a hundred years of pro-US propaganda exported to the rest of the world in the form of pop-culture entertainment.

The US created the demand by advertising itself as the greatest damn place on the planet for at least a century. Now it's up to you guys to either prove it, or shut the hell up.

If you guys are so worried about a few thousand impoverished Central Americans destroying your "land of the free and home of the brave" then there is something very wrong there.

Again, what do other countries do? Because we are being made out to be evil scum for doing one of the most basic things a country can do - secure its borders.

As noted above, my country has a despicable, evil and scummy policy of locking up vulnerable people on islands. I don't like it.

Our problem is that most people don't want to go to any other country so we get them all. You have no idea what the problem is like here because we are the only country with it at such a constant scale.

I think people in the EU might disagree with you:
euronews said:
In 2017, the number of non-EU citizens who were refused entry to the EU rose by 13% compared to the previous year.

Over 439,000 non-EU citizens were refused entry into the EU at one of its external borders.

Spain refused almost half of all non-EU citizens who were refused entry into the EU last year (203,025 out of 439,505), followed by France (86,320) and Poland (38.660).

The migrant crisis has led to a widening political divide in Europe, especially between Italy, where most migrants first enter the EU, and Germany, the places where most migrants attempt to travel due to the passport-free Schengen area.
https://www.euronews.com/2018/07/09...creases-while-number-of-those-kicked-out-rise

Plenty of people trying to get into Europe.

Anyone have a plan? My plan was mentioned above: "Deny them entry in the first place and forcibly remove them if they get through"

I'm tempted to ask how your family got into America and whether or not they would have been forcibly removed if this policy had been in place at the time... But I won't.

I'll just point out that the US was founded by immigrants and their families. It grew in size and prosperity through the efforts of immigrants. Its strength and diversity is a product of immigration and the fact that it now fears immigration is a terrible shame.

Have a nice day...
 
Even if the reason they pulled them was a lack of prescription, if they're taking them then they, at least, think something's wrong. Get a freaking doctor. It's not rocket science. It really isn't.

Heck, when I was deployed to Iraq, we even got doctors for our detainees if they showed signs of illness. On the same day, even.

Throughout the United States, if Law Enforcement finds a prescription drug that is in the possession of someone to which it is not prescribed, they confiscate it. This is not waived because you are attempting to enter the US illegally.
 
Only in a minority of cases.

But I'm worried that I've wandered into a forum No-Go Zone, so I'll leave it there...

Doesn't matter if it's a "minority." "Many" people are entering the country illegally and disregarding court orders.
 

Back
Top Bottom