Mueller Investigation pt4

[varwoche]

You are deluding yourself if you think he was only guilty of lying to the FBI.

That is speculation

False. We know for a fact that he failed to report income from Russian entities on his disclosure.

 

[Stacyhs]

False. We know for a fact that he failed to report income from Russian entities on his disclosure.

Will you just stop with those pesky facts? They get in the way of what some want/need to believe.

 

[The Big Dog]

False. We know for a fact that he failed to report income from Russian entities on his disclosure.

What criminal statute did that violate?

 

[Stacyhs]

It's going to be very interesting looking at these threads a year from now.

 

[smartcooky]

You are speculating if you think this is just about lying to the FBI. If the that's all it was the case would have been wrapped up months ago.

Yup. You don't need to be interviewed NINETEEN TIMES by the SCO if all you have done is lie to the FBI in ONE interview, and then admitted to it straight away.

 

[The Big Dog]

I was told that Flynn sold Trump down the river.

The evidence of that has been notably lacking. No surprise.

I understand that he has met with Mueller tho. Therefore they are are recommending a sentence within the guidelines.

Rolls eyes.

 

[acbytesla]

I was told that Flynn sold Trump down the river.

The evidence of that has been notably lacking. No surprise.

I understand that he has met with Mueller tho. Therefore they are are recommending a sentence within the guidelines.

Rolls eyes.

Did you see all those lines that were redacted? Do you really think that was nothing of merit?

Bless your heart.

 

[Steve]

What criminal statute did that violate?

None of course. The judge accepted a guilty plea to a noncriminal act just because Mueller told him to. He's gonna be soooo sorry in the morning.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Did you see all those lines that were redacted? Do you really think that was nothing of merit?

Bless your heart.

Redacted lines are not evidence because we literally don't know what I'd under there.

 

[The Big Dog]

None of course. The judge accepted a guilty plea to a noncriminal act just because Mueller told him to. He's gonna be soooo sorry in the morning.

Please go back and review the post I was replying to.

Thanks.

 

[The Big Dog]

Redacted lines are not evidence because we literally don't know what I'd under there.

We also don’t know that the redactions refer to Trump’s conduct, of course.

 

[Lambchops]

No justice no peace

No gods, no masters.

 

[acbytesla]

Redacted lines are not evidence because we literally don't know what I'd under there.

While this is true you should consider why there is ANYTHING redacted if the lying to the FBI Agents was the only thing of merit. If the lying was it, there would be nothing redacted. That there is page after page blacked out, it says almost screaming there is much more. We're just not telling the world as of yet,

 

[acbytesla]

We also don’t know that the redactions refer to Trump’s conduct, of course.

Bless your heart.

 

[The Big Dog]

By the way? It bears repeating that the redactions were in

STRZOK’s 302 INTERVIEW SUMMARY

The redactions had nothing to do with Flynn at all.

Which I have explained several times.

It is amazing that deliberately false information gets treated as true, while the actual information that I provide gets ignored.

Oh well

 

[acbytesla]

By the way? It bears repeating that the redactions were in

STRZOK’s 302 INTERVIEW SUMMARY

The redactions had nothing to do with Flynn at all.

Which I have explained several times.

It is amazing that deliberately false information gets treated as true, while the actual information that I provide gets ignored.

Oh well

Sure... Can someone say KOO KOO?

We can't help it if you're peddling bull ****, absurd nonsense, etc. Time and time again the thread has addressed your points. Do you really think if you repeat it over and over that we're going to go with your CT as opposed to reality?

 

[The Big Dog]

Here is the filing

https://www.scribd.com/document/395716348/Flynn-Interview-Documents#from_embed?platform=hootsuite

The second attachment is an interview summary of Peter Strzok, NOT General Flynn.

Oh well, I suggest that folks think long and hard about why people are flat out lying about the attached exhibits.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Desperation appears to be common among Trumpanzees. I wonder why TBD isn't one of the defense lawyers for Trump's team.......

 

[acbytesla]

By the way? It bears repeating that the redactions were in

STRZOK’s 302 INTERVIEW SUMMARY

The redactions had nothing to do with Flynn at all.

Which I have explained several times.

It is amazing that deliberately false information gets treated as true, while the actual information that I provide gets ignored.

Oh well

What's really interesting is why you are so focused on this document as if it changes that Flynn was lying.

Flynn lied on television. He lied to Vice President Pence. Flynn lied to the FBI Agents and has admitted he did lie. Flynn also made materially false statements in filings he provided to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. He made them even though he was represented by counsel and being explicitly warned that submitting false information was a Federal offense.

You can argue all day just how important this is, but frankly I don't see it. In the mean time. Flynn has plead guilty of this crime and has provided substantial cooperation with the SCO.

Mic drop.

 

[BobTheCoward]

While this is true you should consider why there is ANYTHING redacted if the lying to the FBI Agents was the only thing of merit. If the lying was it, there would be nothing redacted. That there is page after page blacked out, it says almost screaming there is much more. We're just not telling the world as of yet,

Those making a claim need to present their evidence. This is literally not presenting evidence.