Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
Of course Macaulay Culkin and Mel Gibson need to be painted as crazy wackjobs. After all, if serious investigation of hollywood pedophiles happens, goodness knows who else might get caught in the net.
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with Qanon?

First off, Culkin was sexually abused, he has admitted this, but has never said who done it. He's an adult and this is his choice. He is also an addict. He's painted himself.

Gibson has been an alcoholic his entire career with dry stretches here and there. Obviously he is so outraged by the sea of child molesters that he has started a legal fund, and an website wherein producers, directors, and actors are revealed to be abusers...oh wait, no he hasn't. He hasn't outed anybody.

If you want to discuss Hollywood pedophiles you need to start a new thread. We have different rules out here than in D.C....not that you'll bother to read up on how things work in our underworld no matter how easy they are to look up.
 
Bubba said:
Why does Podesta like red shoes?

>>>


Circa 1990, The Exorcist III.

This movie is full of hidden meanings that only become apparent once your awake.

Around the 10 minute mark, George C Scott's character tells his daughter who is on her way to the gym "watch out for the red shoes". The comment is so out of context and meaningless to the dialogue one soon forgets it.

Later at around the 14 minute mark George C Scott says "there are monsters prowling the world, some even in this neighborhood, and children suffer".

The movie is filled with lines like that and much symbolism. They were putting it right in our faces even then.

>>>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mKx-soUD0Y
Click to expand...

So which came first, Bubba?
Did Tony Podesta watch The Exorcist III and decide to start wearing red shoes so he could become a recognisable member of the paedophile network? Or did William Blatty decide to encode cryptic messages in his books and films because he was a paedophile and he wanted to "put it in our faces"? Perhaps Blatty knew about the child abuse ring, but decided to sit on his hands, and content himself with inserting code into his works, codes that would not be recognised until decades later and thus too late to help any actual children being abused? Who invented the "red shoes = child abuser" symbol anyway?
While you're mulling over your answer on your yacht, perhaps you could also address the numerous other tricky questions you're currently studiously ignoring.
 
I'm still amused by the idea that some television broadcasts "disappear" after airing is nefarious. What else can a broadcast do but disappear after it airs? Where do thoughts go after you have them? Where do the numbers on a calculator go when you turn it off?

[IMGw=400]https://i.imgur.com/3AzX6l3.jpg[/IMGw]
 
Last Sunday, a guest on Meet the Press made the unfortunate comment that Mueller has only left us "breadcrumbs" about what he knows. If any Q supporters actually watched MTP, the internet would have exploded. Fortunately, none of them do.

Bubba, to be clear, she used a common English idiom. She was not signaling that she is a closet Q believer. (Yeah, yeah, how do I know? Because she exhibited basic intelligence. Duh.)
 
It’s sad and funny that “Q” followers think Trump is some sort of crusader fighting a nefarious “deep state”, rather than a corrupt, compromised, pathologically narcissistic bungler who has surrounded himself with equally corrupt and treasonous bunglers... but the real kicker is all the corrupt bunglers and corrupt non-bunglers propping him up.

When he becomes a serious political liability to the coalition of grifters profiting from him, you’ll see what “deep state” looks like - his mouthpieces on Fox will seamlessly turn against him, GOP senators will exhibit fairly realistic-looking signs of morality and resolve, the dark-money contributions from the Kochs and Adelsons and Mercers will go to attack ads against him, and the vast bulk of his supporters will flip smoothly into “I knew he was a bad guy all along”.

Kicker #2 is that there’s no idiot code words and colored shoes and such conspiracist nonsense required to understand this; it’s all out in the open.
 
Last edited:
sts60 said:
It’s sad and funny that “Q” followers think Trump is some sort of crusader fighting a nefarious “deep state”, rather than a corrupt, compromised, pathologically narcissistic bungler who has surrounded himself with equally corrupt and treasonous bunglers... but the real kicker is all the corrupt bunglers and corrupt non-bunglers propping him up.

When he becomes a serious political liability to the coalition of grifters profiting from him, you’ll see what “deep state” looks like - his mouthpieces on Fox will seamlessly turn against him, GOP senators will exhibit fairly realistic-looking signs of morality and resolve, the dark-money contributions from the Kochs and Adelsons and Mercers will go to attack ads against him, and the vast bulk of his supporters will flip smoothly into “I knew he was a bad guy all along”.

Kicker #2 is that there’s no idiot code words and colored shoes and such conspiracist nonsense required to understand this; it’s all out in the open.
Click to expand...

I'm a member of a gun forum that includes a lot of political talk. One popular theory is that Trump is going to be releasing a bunch of secret intel and indictments that take care of all the favorite Republican boogiemen.

Even if these secret indictments existed, I find it hilarious that people would honestly believe that Trump would have the restraint to not immediately start blabbing about this at every opportunity.

The gallows that Mueller is building for Trump on the white house lawn is steadily approaching completion and Trump has a get out of jail free card that he's not cashing in. Even for conspiracy nuts, this must strain credulity.
 
sts60 said:
It’s sad and funny that “Q” followers think Trump is some sort of crusader fighting a nefarious “deep state”, rather than a corrupt, compromised, pathologically narcissistic bungler who has surrounded himself with equally corrupt and treasonous bunglers... but the real kicker is all the corrupt bunglers and corrupt non-bunglers propping him up.

When he becomes a serious political liability to the coalition of grifters profiting from him, you’ll see what “deep state” looks like - his mouthpieces on Fox will seamlessly turn against him, GOP senators will exhibit fairly realistic-looking signs of morality and resolve, the dark-money contributions from the Kochs and Adelsons and Mercers will go to attack ads against him, and the vast bulk of his supporters will flip smoothly into “I knew he was a bad guy all along”.

Kicker #2 is that there’s no idiot code words and colored shoes and such conspiracist nonsense required to understand this; it’s all out in the open.
Click to expand...


Qanon/Trump's "deep state" in a nutshell, according to Dan Bongino.

Dan Bongino, author of Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump, lists reasons why the Mueller probe is the cleanup operation for what he called the "biggest scam in American history."
Click to expand...


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v..._biggest_spy_scandal_in_american_history.html
 
This moron wrote a book and was apparently unaware that "Spygate" refers to Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots videotaping the New York Jets defensive playcalling? We really need to move past putting "-gate" on everything when it's a scandal.
 
This isn't really a discussion anymore

Bubba isn't really arguing anything. He just posts QAnon links and quotes them at length. I didn't think it was possible to have content of lower quality than JAQing, but Bubba isn't even commenting on half the crap he posts. Probe too much into any one detail and he'll just disavow it as the source's stance and not his own. It's just a clearinghouse of Q conspiracy dispatches.
 
Last edited:
Cosmic Yak said:
So which came first, Bubba?
Did Tony Podesta watch The Exorcist III and decide to start wearing red shoes so he could become a recognisable member of the paedophile network? Or did William Blatty decide to encode cryptic messages in his books and films because he was a paedophile and he wanted to "put it in our faces"? Perhaps Blatty knew about the child abuse ring, but decided to sit on his hands, and content himself with inserting code into his works, codes that would not be recognised until decades later and thus too late to help any actual children being abused? Who invented the "red shoes = child abuser" symbol anyway?
While you're mulling over your answer on your yacht, perhaps you could also address the numerous other tricky questions you're currently studiously ignoring.
Click to expand...

In a rare fit of whimsy, I googled Podesta Red Shoes.

A Non Qanon source: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/26/tony-podesta-has-a-party_n_333819.html

Looks like several other people are also wearing red shoes. Podesta's Minions or Podesta's Funions?
 
Q followers:

Months ago Q said Trump will have Army corp engineers do the job to secure the border as a national security measure if congress will not secure the border.
 
Bubba's shtick here reminds of what a professional comedian told me about David Letterman's act on the Late Show - He (Letterman) tells the joke and mugs to the audience to suggest to them it was "me (Letterman) and you against the joke."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom