Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

I point out gross false equivalence in post.
Get called a liar.
Points out that the post says even more appalling
Post after post calls me a liar.
Highlights the fact that the post literally says "even more appalling"
Poster "officially" edits the post :rolleyes: to make it just an outrageous false equivalence, calls TBD a liar anyway.

Oh well, progress of a sort, I guess
Yup. As I thought, my post made absolutely no impact whatsoever.

My "editing" the post to clear a misunderstanding does in no way absolve you of lying, nor should it be interpreted as an admission that you are correct in any way.
 
Yup. As I thought, my post made absolutely no impact whatsoever.

My "editing" the post to clear a misunderstanding does in no way absolve you of lying, nor should it be interpreted as an admission that you are correct in any way.

Of course it didn't, it was a total embarrassment.

Misunderstanding? what a spectacular fraud.

"But the idea that you think that this is characteristic of atheism rather than an activity of the totalitarian government of China is even more appalling. "

Oh that total fraud "edited" his post two months later!

What a fraud.
 
As predicted, my granting a concession completely failed to engender any reciprocity from The Big Dog. In fact, all it did was prompt ridicule. Obviously, this will be the last concession of any kind I give to The Big Dog.
 
As predicted, my granting a concession completely failed to engender any reciprocity from The Big Dog. In fact, all it did was prompt ridicule. Obviously, this will be the last concession of any kind I give to The Big Dog.

Hi! Abandoning a spectacularly offensive and frivolous position only to assume a slightly less although still completely offensive and frivolous position is not a concession.

My suggestion is that one takes a "deep dive" into the concept of "false equivalence" and realize that comparing a post on the internet to putting a million people in concentration camps is never not a losing proposition suitable only for ridicule.

/although the threat of continuing to be wrong because TBD hurt my feels is hilarious
 
Last edited:
Curious tho that actual human rights violations perpetrated by Unyielding Marxist Atheists do not appear to “disgust” our intrepid correspondents.
 
Congressional calendar:

https://www.rollcall.com/news/polic...ar-senators-plan-sessions-house-mid-term-year

I guess anti-religious types don't care about human rights or the truth.

Contact your Representatives

Who are those representatives? Leave the vicious cycle of your ultra-conservative Catholicism and collaborate with independent human rights organizations such as Amnesty International. That's what I do. That way you will fight for the human rights of everyone and not just those who command you these "representatives".
 
Who are those representatives? Leave the vicious cycle of your ultra-conservative Catholicism and collaborate with independent human rights organizations such as Amnesty International. That's what I do. That way you will fight for the human rights of everyone and not just those who command you these "representatives".

W. T. F.

Representatives in Congress obviously, for Christ sake I linked to Congress’s calendar. I mean c’mon...

Unbelievable....
 
Curious tho that actual human rights violations perpetrated by Unyielding Marxist Atheists do not appear to “disgust” our intrepid correspondents.

They do, but this is obviously not the place to relate to them.

Hans
 
Curious tho that actual human rights violations perpetrated by Unyielding Marxist Atheists do not appear to “disgust” our intrepid correspondents.

I don't know? I think homeopaths who make unsupported claims about the products they peddle should be thrown in jail so I don't see the problem with religious people being thrown in jail for making unsupported claims about the myths they are peddling to the people they are indoctrinating.
 
Concentration camps will never lack for Unyielding Athiests to man the towers and the wire.
 
Last edited:
Concentration camps will never lack for Unyielding Athiests to man the towers and the wire.

Where do I sign up?

How's the pay? I'd love to man a tower on the perimeter of a concentration camp for the sequestration of brain-rapists, but I won't do it pro bono.
 
Who, apart from yourself, has portrayed atheists and Marxists as victims?

This is not something you are "pointing out", this is something you are inventing.

Oh golly, many people, most recently the person who claimed that talking about a MILLION PEOPLE IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS was to "push the anti-atheist agenda favored by many of the USA's religious right."

No, and it's quite obvious what you've done.
This is the exchange, just to make it clear.

But if he didn't, what would he be left with to troll the atheists with and push the anti-atheist agenda favored by many of the USA's religious right?

Yeah, atheists are the victims here. Maybe the USA religious right got together with Xi to destroy churches, crack down on religious and put a million plus religious people in concentration camps as part of the, whomp whomp:

Anti-atheist agenda.

/ Oh man, just jaw dropping at this point.


The claim that atheists are victims, from Aridas, is that they are the victims of you and your incessant and false attempts to scapegoat all atheists for the wrongdoings of the Chinese government.
The only one conflating this with putting people in camps is you. No-one except you has claimed that your trolling and the oppression by the Chinese government are in any way equal.
If all you can do is argue against your own strawmen, you should perhaps rethink your premises.
 
As predicted, my granting a concession completely failed to engender any reciprocity from The Big Dog. In fact, all it did was prompt ridicule. Obviously, this will be the last concession of any kind I give to The Big Dog.

Hi! Abandoning a spectacularly offensive and frivolous position only to assume a slightly less although still completely offensive and frivolous position is not a concession.

My suggestion is that one takes a "deep dive" into the concept of "false equivalence" and realize that comparing a post on the internet to putting a million people in concentration camps is never not a losing proposition suitable only for ridicule.

/although the threat of continuing to be wrong because TBD hurt my feels is hilarious

"Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us".

Who said that, TBD?

In which denomination of whatever religion you claim to be following is it taught that you should respond to slights with insults, not acknowledge concessions, and maintain an attitude of sneering and mockery?
Can I recommend Christianity to you? (Again). There are some pointers for behaviour you could benefit from.
 
Concentration camps will never lack for Unyielding Athiests to man the towers and the wire.

For those that care about facts, here's some historical background on concentration camps.
They were invented by the Spanish- Catholics.
Next used by the British- Protestant- and the US- Christians of various denominations.
The most infamous, in WW!!, were, of course, staffed by Protestant Germans and their Christian allies.
It is somewhat disingenious to claim that they are an atheist thing, or that atheists are somehoe queueing up to staff them.
But we knew that.
 

Back
Top Bottom