Belz...
Fiend God
Values are the few things I have opinions on.
But not consequences, which are intrinsically linked to values.
Amusing.
Values are the few things I have opinions on.
We already have a bunch of stateless kids in our country. Democrats call them "Dreamers."
Must be a bugger being continuously wrong.
Yes but they don't know or even speak the language of their home country, effectively rendering them stateless.
We've always had them.and the only reason we have 'dreamers' is the GOP refuses to address the problem.
There would probably be SOME number of stateless children. Not every country automatically confers citizenship by descent.
But honestly, I think a problem similar to the dreamers would be bad enough. While they may technically have citizenship somewhere, it would be a country they may have never seen and may not even speak the language of. They would be a group we invest in 18 years of education for, only to have them not be able to fully participate and fullfill our investment.
Chiming in another vote that citizenship should be assigned to that of the birth parents, not the Nation that you happened to plop out in.
I remember that martial arts legend and actor Bruce Lee was born in the US while his parents were touring here with (I think) a Chinese Opera from Hong Kong, where he was raised. When he grew up, he moved to America with his birth certificate and declaring citizenship. Just seems a capricious way of becoming a citizen.
But not consequences, which are intrinsically linked to values.
Amusing.
I disagree that they are linked.
No you don't.
Wasn't the 14th Amendment introduced by Republicans?
I think we need your help to understand what you meant by saying it 'barely cleared the bar'.
theprestige said:Birthright citizenship was introduced in the 14th Amendment. If the amendment itself didn't bother to clear the bar, why should repealing the amendment have to clear the bar?Personally I think there is a bar for just about ANY legislation that it needs to address a serious harm productively or provide a serious tangible good.
When talking about changing the constitution, that bar is raised much higher.
I have a hard time seeing that birthright citizenship creates such a major harm to justify such a fundamental legal change.
But they did. Trump was willing to give them citizenship for the wall. The dems balked.
Full context for those that aren't bothering to 'even read the thread.'![]()
What an offer!
I'll do the decent thing, but only if you agree to throw billions of dollars to me so that I can throw them away in a pointless gesture that appeals to my base.
Those Democratic scoundrels, thinking that doing the decent thing shouldn't require a bribe!
Wasn't the 14th Amendment introduced by Republicans?
Chiming in another vote that citizenship should be assigned to that of the birth parents, not the Nation that you happened to plop out in.
I remember that martial arts legend and actor Bruce Lee was born in the US while his parents were touring here with (I think) a Chinese Opera from Hong Kong, where he was raised. When he grew up, he moved to America with his birth certificate and declaring citizenship. Just seems a capricious way of becoming a citizen.
Sure it is. But it's not like that's what his parents were thinking when they came to the US. Lee lived his entire childhood in China and was a child actor there. He came to the US not to stay but for his education. He taught martial arts which led to his tv and movie career in the US.
But they did. Trump was willing to give them citizenship for the wall. The dems balked.
Not really. The U.S. just doesn't care whether you are a citizen of the U.S. and another country unless you do something really stupid, like go to war against us.
.
https://travel.state.gov/content/tr...nality-Dual-Nationality/Dual-Nationality.html