Cont: Mueller Investigation pt3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Baylor said:
Sigh, at least try to follow along. I know you're relatively new to the forum. About ten years ago, Rolfe thoroughly proved Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was innocent of the Lockerie Bombing. Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was put in prison in part by the fake evidence presented by Assistant Attorney General Robert Mueller, who was in charge of the investigation.
Click to expand...
I thought this guy was in charge of the investigation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_McDougall
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
I don't know what Rolfe's book says about Mueller. I haven't read it. You don't know what Rolfe's book says about Mueller. You've not read it either.

I'm asking you for a credible source for your claim that Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

Perhaps you could link to the place where you got this information from?
Click to expand...

I know what Rolfe's book says about Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. I know Robert Mueller convicted Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. I know Robert Mueller knowingly put an innocent man behind bars.
 
LSSBB said:
Specifics. What specifically did he, himself, fake or direct to be faked by a subordinate?

And don't just refer to the entire case discussion. I participated in and followed those threads. I looked into it as a refresher, and there was one single mention of Mueller - with regards to involvement by other countries such as Iran.
Click to expand...

Mueller was in charge of the investigation and indictment of Megrahi. Mueller put an innocent man behind bars. What part do you not understand?
 
Baylor said:
I know what Rolfe's book says about Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. I know Robert Mueller convicted Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. I know Robert Mueller knowingly put an innocent man behind bars.
Click to expand...

I'm asking you for a credible source for your claim that Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
I'm asking you for a credible source for your claim that Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.
Click to expand...

You still don't understand? How about a photo of Mueller presenting fake evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

6FNFLr6.png
 
C_Felix said:
Can we please un-derail this thread.
Click to expand...

Mueller's history of framing innocent people is not a derail. It's a big part of the topic. We see a pattern of behavior with Mueller. He framed two innocent people in the Anthrax attacks one of whom committed suicide. I also find it interesting that a forum member exposed Mueller as a corrupt attorney some ten years ago.
 
Baylor said:
You still don't understand? How about a photo of Mueller presenting fake evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.
Click to expand...

That's a picture posted on imgur. I'm asking you for a credible source for your claim that Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.
 
Baylor said:
I know what Rolfe's book says about Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. I know Robert Mueller convicted Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. I know Robert Mueller knowingly put an innocent man behind bars.
Click to expand...

But we would like to learn how you came to "know" this. Just saying you know something that

1) none of us has ever heard of, and
2) you admit to gleaning from a book you haven't read, and
3) you apparently conclude guilt from based on a reported supposition that obviously was never thought to warrant prosecution in the first place,

hardly constitutes damning evidence.
 
Baylor said:
You still don't understand? How about a photo of Mueller presenting fake evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/6FNFLr6.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

On the oft chance that the caption to the article is correct that doesn't show he faked evidence. It would show he presented evidence that turned out to be planted. Unless you think Mueller knew about the planting.
 
Baylor said:
You still don't understand? How about a photo of Mueller presenting fake evidence in the Lockerbie investigation.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/6FNFLr6.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Presenting fake evidence he thought was given to him in good faith is a far cry from faking evidence himself.
 
kookbreaker said:
Presenting fake evidence he thought was given to him in good faith is a far cry from faking evidence himself.
Click to expand...

At best it's gross incompetence. But any reasonable person would conclude he knowingly presented fraudulent evidence. Aggressively targeting innocent people is a pattern of behavior we see with Mueller. Bruce Ivins ended his life because Mueller had framed him for the anthrax attacks.
 
eeyore1954 said:
On the oft chance that the caption to the article is correct that doesn't show he faked evidence. It would show he presented evidence that turned out to be planted. Unless you think Mueller knew about the planting.
Click to expand...

On the oft chance that Mueller didn't know the evidence was fraudulent when he presented it, he sure as hell would have in 2009 when Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was released in prison. Mueller wrote a tirade that he was "outraged" over al-Megrahi's release. Mueller wanted an innocent man in prison. Case closed.
 
Baylor said:
At best it's gross incompetence. But any reasonable person would conclude he knowingly presented fraudulent evidence.
Click to expand...

Is this an admission that you do not have a credible source for your claim that Mueller faked evidence in the Lockerbie investigation? Are you retracting that claim in favour of the new claims that Mueller was grossly incompetent and that, while there is no evidence for it, you believe it's reasonable to conclude that he knowingly presented - although did not himself fake or order faked - evidence?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom