• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed George Soros and others targetted by Terrorist

better, I am the guy who linked you to the garbage "timer" on the tiny "bomb."

TBD brings the goods, baby.

As I say, I'll prefer to listen to what those that have actually seen and handled the devices have to say than to an anonymous poster who thinks he can determine the timer from a blurry image of one that was covered in tape.
 
As I say, I'll prefer to listen to what those that have actually seen and handled the devices have to say than to an anonymous poster who thinks he can determine the timer from a blurry image of one that was covered in tape.

'k. Double standards, you pick and choose based on your preferred result, cool cool.
 
'k. Double standards, you pick and choose based on your preferred result, cool cool.

Yeah double standards, picking the people with actual expertise and direct knowledge, it's just like the double standard of listening to rocket scientists and engineers opinions on the Apollo missions over some anonymous YouTuber.

But hey, you do you.
 
Yeah double standards, picking the people with actual expertise and direct knowledge, it's just like the double standard of listening to rocket scientists and engineers opinions on the Apollo missions over some anonymous YouTuber.

But hey, you do you.

Anonymous people, tho, right? It is cool, we get it.
 
IIRC, a lot of the bombs the Columbine shooters had didn't go off.
 
No you don't, but that's fine cause continuing this distraction just keeps on playing into your twisted trolling games.

Sometime you don't like anonymous claims on the internet,
sometimes you do.... like when NBC said it.... and then they said this:

Some of the 10 suspected mail bombs addressed to high-profile Democrats and others over the last few days were flawed and not capable of exploding, while others have yet to be fully analyzed, several investigators said Thursday.

Oh noes! It was anonymous!
 
Anonymous people, tho, right? It is cool, we get it.

Like Ziggy Sauer who looks like his 55, graduated from UCLA in 2016 and is now president and CEO of the Macarthur Parker Foundation*? Pull the other one.





*hat tip The Simpsons.
 
Sometime you don't like anonymous claims on the internet,
sometimes you do.... like when NBC said it.... and then they said this:

Some of the 10 suspected mail bombs addressed to high-profile Democrats and others over the last few days were flawed and not capable of exploding, while others have yet to be fully analyzed, several investigators said Thursday.

Oh noes! It was anonymous!

"Flawed" does not mean "Fake", "not capable of exploding" does not mean "not intended to detonate".
 
Like Ziggy Sauer who looks like his 55, graduated from UCLA in 2016 and is now president and CEO of the Macarthur Parker Foundation*? Pull the other one.

*hat tip The Simpsons.

Well graduated from the Naval Academy, got a MBA from the UCLA School of business (imagine that, an older guy getting an MBA) and was US Navy, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group ONE.

But you called him Ziggy, so game set match to you!
 
Seriously, this is a dumb argument.

One bomb was found and destroyed, the other 7 were intercepted by either the Secret Service or other authorities and disarmed by the bomb squad. Why do you think the things should have exploded? Do you think that when the bomb squad got them that they should have just put them on a table to see what would happen? The reason none went off was because they were found and deal with in time. No one that has actually dealt with the devices has said that they would not have exploded, in fact the exact opposite seems to be the case.

This just shows the level of discourse right now. There is no amount of logical contortions one wont make to twist facts to fit the ideology. Bombs sent to Democrats? Well, they didn't go off so no harm done. In fact, they didn't go off so they weren't actual bombs. In fact, probably fakes. In fact, false flag. Fake news. #MAGA.

Ok, well then you are backing off your objection that the big dog is anonymous.

cool, cool.

You can't possibly not be aware that news outlets actually know the name of their source, they just don't reveal it. You, on the other hand, are actually an unknown.
 
Well graduated from the Naval Academy, got a MBA from the UCLA School of business (imagine that, an older guy getting an MBA) and was US Navy, Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group ONE.

But you called him Ziggy, so game set match to you!

Russian Trollskie.
 
This just shows the level of discourse right now. There is no amount of logical contortions one wont make to twist facts to fit the ideology. Bombs sent to Democrats? Well, they didn't go off so no harm done. In fact, they didn't go off so they weren't actual bombs. In fact, probably fakes. In fact, false flag. Fake news. #MAGA.


You get two thumbs up for seeing the bread crumb trail to its purposefully intended conclusion... and in such a sweetly concise way too.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::D
 
Sometime you don't like anonymous claims on the internet,
sometimes you do.... like when NBC said it.... and then they said this:

Oh noes! It was anonymous!

How about you use the entire quote in context?

Some of the 10 suspected mail bombs addressed to high-profile Democrats and others over the last few days were flawed and not capable of exploding, while others have yet to be fully analyzed, several investigators said Thursday.

In some cases, the flaws were substantial. In others, more subtle, they said.

The news comes after investigators said the devices appeared poorly made and that it was unclear if they were hoaxes or simply cases of bad construction. Earlier in the investigation, officials in multiple states had described the items as live explosives and a number of senior bomb techs briefed on the probe said they had all the components necessary for successful explosions.

So all that is saying is that some of the ones checked have flaws in them which could easily be because of bad construction, and since from the outset people have been saying that these were shoddy devices made by someone that didn't know what they were doing, what's changed? Bomb techs that have examined some of the devices said that they were live explosives, and not all of the devices have been examined yet.

I'm still for use of Hanlon's Razor. You seem to be determined that it'll all be a hoax by a libel. I think it's better to wait and see what comes up from the investigation.

BTW, how's your "Firework's Mortar" theory going?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom