• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Behavior of UK Police officers.

Meanwhile - I happened across an EDL march in Manchester (they were being escorted to Manchester Piccadilly and it looked pretty similar to this one in Bristol:

https://www.indy100.com/article/an-...truly-upstaged-by-naked-cyclists--bJmWR8wY6QZ

only with attendees to a comics convention rather than naked cyclists.

One of the EDL members had a Union flag. I was tempted to tell him to show some respect for the flag as he was dragging it along the ground. Unfortunately he was too far away.
 
Your ridiculous lies about no-go areas

CBP9wlp.png
 
No. It's not a "my feelings are hurt" argument. You people keep saying I don't know anything about the UK. Well, switching countries, we feel the exact way about you--if not more strongly.


Wrong again. I have a lot of people replying to me. Most, if not all are insincere. I have no intention of playing the "if I get the last word I win" game.

Someone in the current year has opinions that deviates from what I deem acceptable.


Except that there are statistics and reputable US news organisations as well as some US polices own investigations supporting what we are saying, whilst you have context-free gifs and mis-titled youtube videos promoted by conspiracy theorists. Some of whom seem to think that 9/11 was done by teh Jooz.
 
Except that there are statistics and reputable US news organisations as well as some US polices own investigations supporting what we are saying, whilst you have context-free gifs and mis-titled youtube videos promoted by conspiracy theorists. Some of whom seem to think that 9/11 was done by teh Jooz.

Gish gallop nonsense.
 
Except that there are statistics and reputable US news organisations as well as some US polices own investigations supporting what we are saying,

You are off topic but blacks make up 44% of cop killers but only 30% of people killed by cops are black.
 
You are off topic but blacks make up 44% of cop killers but only 30% of people killed by cops are black.

We have so few people in either category that we don't have comparable statistics. And of course, every time a policeman kills someone there is a full and independent investigation, and misdeeds can end up with a murder charge. Pity the US can't be bothered with such niceties.
 
Last edited:
You are off topic but blacks make up 44% of cop killers but only 30% of people killed by cops are black.

I'd argue that most shootings by US police probably are justified. However there are statistics that suggest that many are not.

Most people shot by US police are armed. That might be an issue, but it's a wider one than simple US police behaviour. Armed Whites and Blacks seem to be shot in roughly the proportions you'd expect from demographics.

However, when you get to shooting of unarmed people, the statistics diverge.

Blacks far outweigh the proportion you'd expect for this.

It't the shooting of people who are no threat that is the problem.
 
I'd argue that most shootings by US police probably are justified. However there are statistics that suggest that many are not.

Most people shot by US police are armed. That might be an issue, but it's a wider one than simple US police behaviour. Armed Whites and Blacks seem to be shot in roughly the proportions you'd expect from demographics.

However, when you get to shooting of unarmed people, the statistics diverge.

Blacks far outweigh the proportion you'd expect for this.

It't the shooting of people who are no threat that is the problem.

Your problem is assuming blacks and whites act the same. They don't--especially in situations to which you are referring. Sorry but you're not going to be able to understand the world reading BBC articles.
 
No go zones are pertinent to this thread. The area circled in red of the satellite image another example of a no-go zone.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/OcigG5K.png[/qimg]

What, you'd expect to be able to wander through Buckingham Palace at will, would you? In the same way that ordinary members of the public can wander around the White House whenever they want.
 
No go zones are pertinent to this thread.....

Indeed they are. But most London members of this forum have the good sense not to be involved with a gormless thread started by a lying white supremacist, and the best way to get them to comment on the claims of no-go areas in London is to have a thread specifically to those ends.
 
What, you'd expect to be able to wander through Buckingham Palace at will, would you? In the same way that ordinary members of the public can wander around the White House whenever they want.


Most of DC is a no-go area. And just look at the size of this mosque!

And it’s all full of immigrants from thousands of miles to the East, many of them religious fanatics.
 
Last edited:
<fx wears a tin hat> Can I stick my head above the parapet?

The phenomenon of the Asian gangs grooming young girls in Rotherham and elsewhere was a product of the pattern of immigration of some subcontinent groups. Their being 'Muslim' is purely concomitant with the original reason of the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants in the early 1960's. Their sole aim was to work in England for a few years, sending money back home, and then to return to marry and raise a family. Thus, this group of migrant was predominantly male, and their pattern of housing was house-sharing, so there'd be a whole household of male occupants (we saw this with some immigrants from East Europe).

Then, the government brought in a Nationality Act which allowed them to bring in their wives and families by a certain date (I think, 1963) after which time no more free migration from Pakistan/India would be allowed. Therefore, instead of returning home, they reasoned they'd bring their close relatives over. The females arrived much later. By then, there was an established culture of a handful of Asian guys buying a house and then sharing it with their fellow countrymen.

Being young males, they were sexually predatory and thus targetted indigenous females, as their own were thousands of miles away.

Unfortunately, this became an ingrained culture which became exposed in recent years as being highly criminal, abherent and organised crime against young girls.

This was not helped by social workers ignoring the girls' plight and dismissing it as their 'lifestyle choice'.

However, the crime is zero to do with 'being Muslim'.

Learn to understand cause and effect, instead of inciting hatred against Muslims.

This seems a very persuasive explanation as to how this particular sub-culture developed.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom