• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Behavior of UK Police officers.

Sure. But that is the chosen hill to die upon. So be it. No skin off my nose.

Exactly, and with an odd idea of what a "gotcha" is.

Pointing out why a claim is flat-out wrong is not a gotcha. Nor is it pedantry.
 
I get people here think EDL=bad. But they have every right to not want another mosque in their city. It's perfectly normal to want to resist a foreign people with a different language, religion, values moving into your country by the millions. You're the weird one for not caring.
In "their" city? Can you provide the Royal warrants that gifted them "their" cities?
 
I get people here think EDL=bad. But they have every right to not want another mosque in their city. It's perfectly normal to want to resist a foreign people with a different language, religion, values moving into your country by the millions. You're the weird one for not caring.

And in a lot of those cases - it is the EDL shipping themselves in to say that they don't want a mosque in someone else's neighbourhood. The actual inhabitants of the local area are perfectly happy for their neighbours to have a place of worship.
 
Thirty years from now women will be saying, "back in my day I remember police, they liked to grandstand and peacock how 'not racist' they were. They despised me for being raped by a Pakistani Muslim because it interfered with them showing off how 'not racist' they were."

Gotta love "progress."
Yet we have arrested many, many people involved in these gangs of serial rapists and we have prosecuted and imprisoned many for a long time.

By the way how many of these gangs have been prosecuted in the USA?
 
You're going to carry on doing this ****, after I told you explicitly and repeatedly how wrong you were?
The thing is of course she only knows about these gangs because they've been successfully prosecuted... Which of course contradicts her point that we ignore them.

Of course there is the legitimate and universal condemnation of the authorities for not taking action sooner but that's not the point her.
 
In "their" city? Can you provide the Royal warrants that gifted them "their" cities?

Indeed. As Jim said, it is every bit as much the city of the muslims as the EDL. More so, in fact, because usually the EDL travel to cities where they don't live, and try to tell people who do actually live there what they should or shouldn't be doing in their own home town.
 
Last edited:
The thing is of course she only knows about these gangs because they've been successfully prosecuted... Which of course contradicts her point that we ignore them.

Of course there is the legitimate and universal condemnation of the authorities for not taking action sooner but that's not the point her.

My apologies to Baylor. Have we missed this revelation somewhere? Not that it makes any difference to the content of my responses, but I'll be more careful with my pronouns.
 
Pseudointellectual nonsense. Never once did I say "Being Muslim causes people to rape." The argument is, "Muslims rape."

Ah. Correlation is not causation, right.

So what you're saying is not that being Muslim makes you a rapist, it's that being a rapist makes you Muslim. Is that it?
 
I get people here think EDL=bad. But they have every right to not want another mosque in their city. It's perfectly normal to want to resist a foreign people with a different language, religion, values moving into your country by the millions. You're the weird one for not caring.

I'd far, far rather have a mosque next to my house than a bunch of knuckle dragging neanderthal EDL thugs living near me.
 
The thing is of course she only knows about these gangs because they've been successfully prosecuted... Which of course contradicts her point that we ignore them.

Of course there is the legitimate and universal condemnation of the authorities for not taking action sooner but that's not the point her.

I haven't seen one thread about Rotherham rape gangs.

Or Rochdale
Or Teldford
Or Oxfordshire
Or Bristol
Or Derby
Or Newcastle

Yet I see a whole lot of faux outrage over "the behaviour of US police officers" and Trump allegedly locking children in cages. Even feigning concern over girls getting raped in your own country by brown people isn't conducive to the "not racist" peacocking you people love so much.
 
Ah. Correlation is not causation, right.

So what you're saying is not that being Muslim makes you a rapist, it's that being a rapist makes you Muslim. Is that it?

No. What I'm saying is her post is pseudointellectual psychobabble, so is yours. She didn't even understand the context of the comment she was replying to.
 
Yet we have arrested many, many people involved in these gangs of serial rapists and we have prosecuted and imprisoned many for a long time.
If the police and social workers weren't cowards and had done their job in the first place those girls wouldn't have been raped in the first place. That's the pertinent issue here.

By the way how many of these gangs have been prosecuted in the USA?

You people and your whataboutisms.
 
I think I'm starting to get the point of this thread.

All Muslims should be lined up and shot by True Blue USA **** Yea cops because reasons....


That's not the point of this thread.

The point of this thread is twofold:

Firstly a sort of false equivalence - we get a lot of talk about poor behaviour on the part of US officers. I think some US posters take that as an attack on the US in general. I think they believe that the US is just being picked on and officers are guilty of the same poor behaviour the world over. Therefore this thread.

However the most important aspect of the thread, for those that are driving it, is as a tool for wind up merchants. You can tell from the way any questions that would conclusively give the lie to their position are studiously ignored until they go away.

They wield, with relish, their largest stirring spoons and don't actually care about logic or honest debate. Therefore, just get out of the pot.
 
Yet we have arrested many, many people involved in these gangs of serial rapists and we have prosecuted and imprisoned many for a long time.

By the way how many of these gangs have been prosecuted in the USA?

Remember that in some states one can marry at 14 but the age of consent is 16

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States#Comparison_with_other_countries

Comparison with other countries
Critics have pointed out that laws regarding child marriage in the United States compare unfavorably to laws regarding child marriage in other countries. For instance, in 2017, Human Rights Watch pointed out that Afghanistan has a tougher law on child marriage than parts of the United States: in Afghanistan the minimum marriage is 15, and that only with permission from their father or a judge; otherwise it is 16.[30] As of that date, in 25 US states there was no minimum marriage age at all if one or more of the grounds for exception existed; this number has now decreased to 18.[31]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherry_Johnson

Early life and first marriage
Johnson grew up in Tampa, Florida. She was an only child, and her household consisted of her, her mother, and her mother's husband.[1] They lived in the parsonage of their conservative Pentecostal church.[2] Beginning at age 8, Johnson was repeatedly raped by the bishop and deacon of her church.[3] Johnson was also raped by her mother's husband.[1] She became pregnant as a result of rape at age 10. The pregnancy was not recognized until she was 7 months along in gestation. Johnson's mother did not support or believe her statements that she was raped, and did not accompany her to the hospital when it was time to deliver the baby. Johnson's mother arranged for her to marry the deacon who had raped her, Alfonsa Tolbert, so that he could avoid criminal charges.[1] At the time, 16- and 17-year old minors could get married with parental permission in Florida, and children of any age could be married with the permission of a county judge if a pregnancy was involved.[1] While the first judge refused to license the marriage of a child so young—though it was legal—a second judge agreed to grant the license and Johnson was married to Tolbert on 29 March 1979 at age 11. Johnson had six children by the time she was 17 years old, and had to drop out of school after ninth grade to raise them. At age 17, she sought help from Legal Aid Society, which gave her $75 to pay for an attorney for her divorce [2][1]

Now Baylor - *That's* whataboutism. But notice the religion involved. Just like the various other Christian child abuse cases and institutional facilitation of this.


The problem isn't Islam. In most* cases it's not just the religion. It's sex offenders finding ways to facilitate their abuse, and many members of organisations aiming to protect the reputation of the organisation rather than the victims.

*There are some sects or cults where that is the case - and the higher-ranking members do claim the right to rape people.
 
...... I see a whole lot of faux outrage over "the behaviour of US police officers".........

It's not faux (do you understand the word?). It's genuine. Most people here are nauseated by the concept of police shooting the public with impunity, and disgusted that this murder is directed disproportionately at specific demographics.
 
I haven't seen one thread about Rotherham rape gangs.

Or Rochdale
Or Teldford
Or Oxfordshire
Or Bristol
Or Derby
Or Newcastle

Yet I see a whole lot of faux outrage over "the behaviour of US police officers" and Trump allegedly locking children in cages. Even feigning concern over girls getting raped in your own country by brown people isn't conducive to the "not racist" peacocking you people love so much.

Class - note how this doesn't actually address what I said, so this is an example of what is known as a non sequitur.
 
I think I'm starting to get the point of this thread.

All Muslims should be lined up and shot by True Blue USA **** Yea cops because reasons....

No the point of this thread is to have a good laugh at wilful ignorance, and have a good laugh at dicking around with some bigits.
 
It's not faux (do you understand the word?). It's genuine. Most people here are nauseated by the concept of police shooting the public with impunity, and disgusted that this murder is directed disproportionately at specific demographics.

Well said. Especially the highlighted. I am proud to live in a country where the police shooting of a terrorist during an attack is automatically investigated - and found to be a lawful killing. That is the right platform to assess the legality of such an event.
 
I get people here think EDL=bad. But they have every right to not want another mosque in their city. It's perfectly normal to want to resist a foreign people with a different language, religion, values moving into your country by the millions. You're the weird one for not caring.
Well, My Mum is from scotland and my dad is from Northern ireland, when I was a child born and growing up in england I was told on various occasions to go back to where I came from, which is frankly ridiculous.
So I guess nothing much has changed for some people.
 

Back
Top Bottom