Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

It helps that they have so many useful idiots creating a false narrative that they're oppressing ALL religions. They don't need to convince anyone that the oppression that's happening is fake news. All they have to do is get any opposition to mount a defense against the wrong horror.

Fighting against the systematic oppression of entire religions requires a very different ground game and international strategy than fighting against forcing the religious into government controlled denominations. The fact that you don't understand this is part of what makes you so useful to China in this matter.

That is so patently absurd I am astonished. You see China wants us to focus on their brutal suppression of religion instead of their ... brutal suppression of religion.

“Eradicating Ideological Viruses” China’s Campaign of Repression Against Xinjiang’s Muslims

Human Rights Watch, those darn "useful idiots" thank goodness we have posters with "funny pictures" to set those human rights' advocate straight!

Human rights watch, Nobel Prize winner, "useful idiots."

-Some atheist skeptic
 
Last edited:
That is so patently absurd I am astonished. You see China wants us to focus on their brutal suppression of religion instead of their ... brutal suppression of religion.

“Eradicating Ideological Viruses” China’s Campaign of Repression Against Xinjiang’s Muslims

Human Rights Watch, those darn "useful idiots" thank goodness we have posters with "funny pictures" to set those human rights' advocate straight!

Ah, but the title of this thread was not "China destroys churches, attack the faithful" was it?

Hans
 
Ah, but the title of this thread was not "China destroys churches, attack the faithful" was it?

Hans

Ah, the opening post linked to an article which said:

BEIJING — China’s government is ratcheting up a crackdown on Christian congregations in Beijing and several provinces, destroying crosses, burning bibles, shutting churches and ordering followers to sign papers renouncing their faith, according to pastors and a group that monitors religion in China. The campaign corresponds with a drive to “Sinicize” religion by demanding loyalty to the officially atheist Communist Party and eliminating any challenge to its power over people’s lives.
Ah....
 
That is so patently absurd I am astonished. You see China wants us to focus on their brutal suppression of religion instead of their ... brutal suppression of religion.

“Eradicating Ideological Viruses” China’s Campaign of Repression Against Xinjiang’s Muslims

Human Rights Watch, those darn "useful idiots" thank goodness we have posters with "funny pictures" to set those human rights' advocate straight!

The fact that you do not understand that different kinds of horrors require different techniques for fighting them is part of what makes you such a useful straw man for China.

You cannot grok the difference between the eradication of religion and the consolidation of religion under government control. This is why you, and those who make the same mistake, will achieve nothing on this matter.
 
Ah, but the title of this thread was not "China destroys churches, attack the faithful" was it?

Hans

We're talking about a guy who literally cannot understand that fighting a government trying to eradicate a religion requires a completely different set of techniques than fighting a government that's trying to control religion. :jaw-dropp

For him, the Islamic eradication of Zoroastrianism in what would become modern day Iran is the same horror as the German NAZIs forcing Catholics and other protestants to join the official NAZI approved church.
 
That wanes quickly after TBD's 10 millionth wiggle.

I'm sorry, I should have been more clear: the talking in tongues is clearly the more entertaining thing to watch. Those guys are into it AF.

But we can shut this down now, 500 has come and gone. TBD still doesn't understand anything more about the topic than he did in the beginning.
 
But we can shut this down now, 500 has come and gone. TBD still doesn't understand anything more about the topic than he did in the beginning.


Since its very beginning, the longevity of this thread depended on such constant lack of understanding. It's more of a design feature than lack of capacity.



But don't worry, there's the Niki Haley thread.
 
I'm sorry, I should have been more clear: the talking in tongues is clearly the more entertaining thing to watch. Those guys are into it AF.

But we can shut this down now, 500 has come and gone. TBD still doesn't understand anything more about the topic than he did in the beginning.

Hey folks, Dr. Keith says we can shut this down.

Lets save arguing that it is inconsequential by saying that a post on the internet is "more appalling,"
or explaining the "logic" behind it,
or saying that they were only attacking "dissident" groups,
or saying that the Chinese were correct to do so because "theocracy, etc"
or desperately trying to derail the issue through the most spectacular series of whataboutism that should embarrass a junior high logic class,
or by attacking the messenger
or calling Human Rights Watch "useful idiots."

for the NEXT thread about egregious human rights abuses against religious people by Firm Marxist Atheists.
 
Last edited:
for the NEXT thread about egregious human rights abuses against religious people by Firm Marxist Atheists.

So obsessed with atheism. As a result, you see merely the form of a horror and not its true cause. Even then, you miss so much of it you could never be part of useful opposition to it.

So sad.
 
So obsessed with atheism. As a result, you see merely the form of a horror and not its true cause. Even then, you miss so much of it you could never be part of useful opposition to it.

So sad.

With any luck, it'll end up in AAH or at best Conspiracy theories. Which is where this thread belongs.

I wouldn't be too harsh however, School started up again and it can be rough.
 
Actually, that was posted to destroy your silly "theocracy" justification for the ongoing human rights abuses, a claim that we note was not only appalling in its attempt to justify the abuses but equally appalling in that the proponent clearly made it up out of whole cloth.
You did not succeed. You only succeeded in justifying them with your own bible quote. Why would there be, or have ever been, theocracies if people didn't believe that their religion demanded it?

And what would you propose to do about the evil atheists?

ETA: All the colorful highlighting of posts brightens my day!
 
Failing to understand you enemy can have very negative consequences for your efforts to oppose them. TBD fails to comprehend this. Then again, so does Donald Trump, at least when it comes to an enemy other than Hillary Clinton.

The Costs of Misunderstanding Our Adversaries


This would be true if enlightenment or at least a speckle of education had been the goal of this thread from the beginning.


I think the real goal of this thread is plenty achieved.
 
Hey folks, Dr. Keith says we can shut this down.

Lets save arguing that it is inconsequential by saying that a post on the internet is "more appalling,"
or explaining the "logic" behind it,
or saying that they were only attacking "dissident" groups,
or saying that the Chinese were correct to do so because "theocracy, etc"
or desperately trying to derail the issue through the most spectacular series of whataboutism that should embarrass a junior high logic class,
or by attacking the messenger
or calling Human Rights Watch "useful idiots."

for the NEXT thread about egregious human rights abuses against religious people by Firm Marxist Atheists.

So do you actually give a crap about human rights?
 
You did not succeed. You only succeeded in justifying them with your own bible quote. Why would there be, or have ever been, theocracies if people didn't believe that their religion demanded it? And what would you propose to do about the evil atheists?

ETA: All the colorful highlighting of posts brightens my day!

Look at them goal post go, go, go!

The claim was that the Chinese Human Right Abuses were understandable because "It's my understanding that one of the tenets of Christianity is establishing theocracy."

TBD requests anything to support that silly claim, gets hysterical arguments like "Speechless. Just speechless. Do you read this stuff, or just vomit it up?"

TBD curbstomps the silly claim.

We are next reduced to, and let me take the time to highlight this all for our gentle readers:

"Why would there be, or have ever been, theocracies if people didn't believe that their religion demanded it?"

Ah, that is so satisfying, to see the original false claim be transferred into meaningless nonsense under the grinding force of my logic.

"And what would you propose to do about the evil atheists?" Hmm, I would suggest that they be subjected to the awful arguments raised in their defense in this thread, but I think that might be cruel and unusual punishment.
 
This would be true if enlightenment or at least a speckle of education had been the goal of this thread from the beginning.


I think the real goal of this thread is plenty achieved.

Indeed.

Hey, when did we plan for the next Firm Atheist meeting? I really hate being caught out of the loop on the atrocities we are committing, whether it be our Marxist wing or our Muslim wing.
 
Indeed.

Hey, when did we plan for the next Firm Atheist meeting? I really hate being caught out of the loop on the atrocities we are committing, whether it be our Marxist wing or our Muslim wing.

The "Muslim wing" of the Atheists.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you "true enlightenment" from the wit and wisdom of the atheists celebrating victory in a fine example of Danth's Law.
 
Last edited:
The "Muslim wing" of the Atheists.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you "true enlightenment" from the wit and wisdom of the atheists celebrating victory in a fine example of Danth's Law.

Sorry you weren't aware. Barry was the head of the Chicago Chapter:

BaracKKK HU$$EIN Osama Soetoro Obama II (Born sometime in 1961 in Kenya) claimed to be the socialist communist atheist Muslim Nazi fascist Muslim President Ayatollah of the United Soviet States of Islamerica, but was constitutionally unqualified for the post, a blinding truth that his liberal lackeys went to great lengths to cover up by denying access to his birth certificate.

Source.
 
Ah, the opening post linked to an article which said:

BEIJING — China’s government is ratcheting up a crackdown on Christian congregations in Beijing and several provinces, destroying crosses, burning bibles, shutting churches and ordering followers to sign papers renouncing their faith, according to pastors and a group that monitors religion in China. The campaign corresponds with a drive to “Sinicize” religion by demanding loyalty to the officially atheist Communist Party and eliminating any challenge to its power over people’s lives.
Ah....

But the title of the thread did not reflect that, right?

Hans
 

Back
Top Bottom