No way! You don't want anything about how ******* atheist monsters actually act, or how they destroy churches, burn books, detain a million muslims?
(confidentially, I don't blame you because destroy churches, burn books, detain a million muslims.... amiright? )
Lets go to the Atheist Bible.... little red book version?
Just kidding because destroy churches, burn books, detain a million muslims...
Say, while you all are waiting still not appalled by destroy churches, burn books, detain a million muslims?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Kapital
I've been wondering why you would want us to read the Wikipedia article about
Das Kapital. Is it because you think that it's about destroying churches, burning books and killing Muslims? I couldn't find anything about that in the Wikipedia article!
By the way, for someone who hates
Capital - A Critique of Political Economy as much as you do, I would recommend that you started reading it! Unlike you, I've read it, a couple of times, actually, and it's a very good book (and very long!). Not so good that we Marxists would call it
the good book! After all, there are plenty of other good ones.
I don't think that it contains anything about burning books and killing Muslims, but it actually does mention destruction of churches but, and now I have to disappoint you, not by
"******* atheist monsters".
Here are some snippets for you from chapter 27:
An Act of Henry VII., 1489, cap. 19, forbad the destruction of all "houses of husbandry" to which at least 20 acres of land belonged. By an Act, 25 Henry VIII., the same law was renewed. It recites, among other things, that many farms and large flocks of cattle, especially of sheep, are concentrated in the hands of a few men, whereby the rent of land has much risen and tillage has fallen off, churches and houses have been pulled down, and marvelous numbers of people have been deprived of the means wherewith to maintain themselves and their families.
The process of forcible expropriation of the people received in the 16th century a new and frightful impulse from the Reformation, and from the consequent colossal spoliation of the church property. The Catholic Church was, at the time of the Reformation, feudal proprietor of a great part of the English land. The suppression of the monasteries, &c., hurled their inmates into the proletariat. The estates of the church were to a large extent given away to rapacious royal favorites, or sold at a nominal price to speculating farmers and citizens, who drove out, en masse, the hereditary sub-tenants and threw their holdings into one. The legally guaranteed property of the poorer folk in a part of the church's tithes was tacitly confiscated.
These immediate results of the Reformation were not its most lasting ones. The property of the church formed the religious bulwark of the traditional conditions of landed property. With its fall these were no longer tenable.
All this happened without the slightest observation of legal etiquette. The Crown lands thus fraudulently appropriated together with the robbery of the Church estates, as far as these had not been lost again during the republican revolution, form the basis of the today princely domains of the English oligarchy. The bourgeois capitalists favored the operation with the view, among others, to promoting free trade in the land, to extending the domain of modern agriculture on the large farm-system, and to increasing their supply of the free agricultural proletarians ready to hand.
It doesn't really sound as if Marx was rejoicing whenever churches were destroyed, does it?!
But on the other hand, he sometimes shows that he isn't very fond of some representatives of the church, for instance in chapter 1, when:
the Church of England Parson, Townsend, glorified misery as a necessary condition of wealth.
He also doesn't approve of other Christian population theorists like, for instance
"Parson Malthus", and when he mentions religious persecution in chapter 1, he does so with this example:
... forms of social production that preceded the bourgeois form, are treated by the bourgeoisie in much the same way as the fathers of the Church treated pre-Christian religions.
But since this is religious persecution
by the Church, it probably doesn't count in your book, does it?!
But now you've actually
learned something new, something
factual, about one of us Marxist atheists' good books! And as mentioned above I've actually
read it! Unlike your Chinese ******* atheist monsters, I think.
I won't be offended if you consider me a tool of your Lord in your journey towards enlightenment!
