Wudang
BOFH
I've posted it before but it's relevant again. The Day the Migrants Left
I prefer a more genteel societal regression.
[qimg]http://www.nickcooper.org.uk/ttc/gallery/images/stillg15.jpg[/qimg]
Yes, I'm sure the Public Acconts Committee will be totally looking the other way, just for this one project.
I do hope some EU bureaucrats have been tasked with finding an excuse to seize his assets post Brexit.Don't forget that the Mogg has made sure his money is outside the UK and firmly in the EU.
What a cockwomble.
Jacob Rees-Mogg has suggested that after Brexit, people crossing the Irish border should be subject to 'inspections, just like during The Troubles'. he also said "It's not a border that one has to go through every day."
Apart from 30,000 or so people that cross every day to go to and from work.
ay attention, entrails-pickers: this dead government has yielded up a new sign. She is Karen Bradley, actual secretary of state for actual Northern Ireland, and she has granted an interview to Parliament’s The House magazine. “I freely admit,” Karen freely admitted, “that when I started this job, I didn’t understand some of the deep-seated and deep-rooted issues that there are in Northern Ireland. I didn’t understand things like when elections are fought, for example, in Northern Ireland – people who are nationalists don’t vote for unionist parties and vice versa.”
the rest is quite cutting tooClearly, it is not simply the initial imbecility of having no clue about the central facts of Northern Irish politics and history, even though you were 28 (TWENTY EIGHT) when the Good Friday agreement was signed. It is also the second imbecility of thinking you should ever mention that in public, much less as delightedly, as Karen did. “It’s when you realise that,” burbled the secretary of state, “that you can then start to understand some of the things that the politicians say and some of the rhetoric.”
Everyone sgrees the current plan is terrible. As no 10 point out there is no better plan for leaving the EU offered by Boris or anyone else. No person understanding trade will back a no deal brexit. Even those who don't understand economics and trade realise that no deal would be a disaster for the UK. The only ones backing it are short term investors wanting a get richer quicker deal.Boris Johnson has attacked Theresa's May's Brexit plan, saying she had "wrapped a suicide vest" around the British constitution and "handed the detonator" to Brussels.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45462900
As no 10 point out there is no better plan for leaving the EU offered by Boris or anyone else.
wereApart from the Canada+ plan that David Davies and his department were working on...
I think they are racing Labour to see who splits first.The differences within the Tory party now look so deep, that a split/UKIP defections look likely.
As for the coveted endorsement from someone Boris would unquestionably have pitied mercilessly at school (they missed being Eton contemporaries by a year), it came in an LBC interview. “Two years ago, in the Conservative party leadership campaign, I supported Boris Johnson, because I thought he would deliver Brexit extraordinarily well,” Rees-Mogg intoned, suggesting he has inherited all his father’s gifts of prophecy. “I haven’t seen anything that would cause me to change my mind on that.” Not anything?! Should have gone to MonocleSavers.
He said that rather than getting a "", Britain is saying, "yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir", to Brussels.
"At every stage of the talks so far, Brussels gets what Brussels wants," wrote Mr Johnson.
"It is a humiliation. We look like a seven-stone weakling being comically bent out of shape by a 500lb gorilla."
It's unfortunate that a vote made on the basis of hypotheticals -- arguments and projections that have been shown to be false or overstated -- is considered more legitimate than another, second vote that now could be made on the basis of hard facts and sober reality. Further, international affairs have shifted so greatly since the advent of Trump (and the impact of Brexit itself) that "Britain First" sounds quite a bit more naive and dangerous, or should do by now.
In addition to the suicide vest comment Johnson offered up these gems:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45462900
He really seems to have been clueless about who had the power in this negotiation. At every point during the referendum campaign when it was made clear a 'generous free trade deal', was simply a Leave fantasy Johnson and his fellow Brexiteers dismissed the warnings as scaremongering. Someone really needs to explain to Johnson that the EU is a 500 pound gorilla relative to the UK's 7 Stone weakling...
But what happens after we have to eat the horses?![]()
Anyone else like Johnson's ever so subtle invoking of Islamophobia with the "suicide-vest" quote?
Yes, because once that shortage hits, the British youth is going to leap into action and take those jobs, now unrightfully taken from them by them foreigners.
And it limits severely their travel options...
That has nothing to do with arrest warrants, so why bring it up?