Which data?

I don’t really think the campaign is going to hurt Nike but in previous quarters online growth has been in the mid 40%. So another article could claim the ad campaign has slowed online growth.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.di...1/nike-kicks-46-web-sales-growth-quarter/amp/

Although since the time period lengths are different, and they'd be ignoring 2017 data entirely, the article would be making a claim based on an apples to oranges comparison. That could be why no article has made that claim so far.

From the article linked by upchurch and commented on by plague311:
Nike’s online sales actually grew 31% from the Sunday of Labor Day weekend through Tuesday, as compared with a 17% gain recorded for the same period of 2017
Same time period different years, an apples to apples comparison.
 
trump tweeted

"Wow, NFL first game ratings are way down over an already really bad last year comparison. Viewership declined 13%, the lowest in over a decade. If the players stood proudly for our Flag and Anthem, and it is all shown on broadcast, maybe ratings could come back? Otherwise worse!"
 
Although since the time period lengths are different, and they'd be ignoring 2017 data entirely, the article would be making a claim based on an apples to oranges comparison. That could be why no article has made that claim so far.

From the article linked by upchurch and commented on by plague311:

Same time period different years, an apples to apples comparison.

Can you find an article comparing 2017 Labor Day online sales to 2016. If not that increase stat also means little.
Online sales also are a small part of Nike’s total sales so using the online statement to show sales were not hurt is not valid either.
Although as I said before I don’t see this add hurting them.
 
It's not a short-term thing.

Nike's brand is not restricted to the US.

It fits entirely with their "just do it" brand message.
 
Can you find an article comparing 2017 Labor Day online sales to 2016. If not that increase stat also means little.
Online sales also are a small part of Nike’s total sales so using the online statement to show sales were not hurt is not valid either.
Although as I said before I don’t see this add hurting them.

Nike sales are up. Not just online sales. But I doubt we can judge the effect of the ad campaign for a while.
 
It's not a short-term thing.

Nike's brand is not restricted to the US.

It fits entirely with their "just do it" brand message.

It's entirely possible that this ad campaign could be good for Nike but bad for the NFL. If that happens, I wonder if the NFL will look to switch sponsors.
 
It's entirely possible that this ad campaign could be good for Nike but bad for the NFL. If that happens, I wonder if the NFL will look to switch sponsors.

The NFL has its own problems without blaming it on Nike. They have a bigger issues with the players still protesting.
 
The NFL has its own problems without blaming it on Nike. They have a bigger issues with the players still protesting.

Sure, but Nike isn't helping them with this. Not that Nike has an obligation to, but it might enter the NFL's calculations in the future.
 
As long as the NFL is pulling in megabucks from Nike they will not be dropped as a sponsor. The NFL will only act on principle if it doesn't cost them money.
 
As long as the NFL is pulling in megabucks from Nike they will not be dropped as a sponsor.

Except that dropping Nike would allow them to pick up a competitor, who would also be paying megabucks.

The NFL will only act on principle if it doesn't cost them money.

Absolutely. But if Nike is costing them any money through other revenue streams, that makes it easier for a competitor such as Adidas to outbid them, even if the direct payments aren't higher.
 
Sure, but Nike isn't helping them with this. Not that Nike has an obligation to, but it might enter the NFL's calculations in the future.

Sure it could. But Nike doesn't have to blackball Kap just because the NFL did. And telling Nike that they must wouldn't help their collusion lawsuit would it? And have you seen the ad? There is absolutely NOTHING offensive about it. Nike's ad campaign is as I said, the least of their problems. They would be better off negotiating with the players to stop the protests.
 
Sure it could. But Nike doesn't have to blackball Kap just because the NFL did.

Of course not. Nike has no obligation to the NFL beyond whatever is in their contract, and I doubt their contract speaks to this issue. But by the same token, the NFL has no obligation to choose Nike as a sponsor again when their current contract ends. Nike can survive without the NFL, and the NFL can survive without Nike. I don't think this guarantees a parting of ways by any means, but it's not impossible.
 
Those who do not support Kaepernick’s right to protest are not patriots.

— Marsha L. Aleem, Lt Colonel U.S. Air Force

The individuals exercising their freedom of speech need and deserve far more respect than the flag.

— Baldwin Yen, U.S. Army

I was more likely to be killed by a police officer at home than by the Taliban.

-- Alec Gillis, U.S. Army

They’re forgetting the Tuskegee Airman.
I think when people say they don’t kneel for the anthem, they’re forgetting all the black and brown service members who served. They’re forgetting the Tuskegee Airman. When my dad served, the people he felt were his friends made jokes about how they’d hang him in their front yard when he came home from fighting side-by-side with white soldiers.

— Autumn, daughter of Tuskegee airman
 
Those who do not support Kaepernick’s right to protest are not patriots.

— Marsha L. Aleem, Lt Colonel U.S. Air Force
Nobody is challenging K's right to protest.

The individuals exercising their freedom of speech need and deserve far more respect than the flagged.

— Baldwin Yen, U.S. Army
No they don't. Protests aren't magic. If your speech rightly makes you a laughingstock, you're not entitled to respect just because you're speaking.

I was more likely to be killed by a police officer at home than by the Taliban.

-- Alec Gillis, U.S. Army
Fun fact: Relatively few soldiers are actually called to go in harm's way. I served in the US Army for six years, encompassing the height of the Yugoslavian crisis. My unit was rotating troops into that theater continuously throughout. But most of the soldiers in my unit never even set foot in the country.

It would be interesting to see Gillis's duty postings, and the casualty rate from enemy action in his duty cohort. It would also be nice to compare it to the police violence encounter rate of his socioeconomic cohort back home, to see if his statistical claim holds up. Oh well. It's got that *truthy* feel to it.

They’re forgetting the Tuskegee Airman.
I think when people say they don’t kneel for the anthem, they’re forgetting all the black and brown service members who served. They’re forgetting the Tuskegee Airman. When my dad served, the people he felt were his friends made jokes about how they’d hang him in their front yard when he came home from fighting side-by-side with white soldiers.

— Autumn, daughter of Tuskegee airman

Once the NFL remembers the Tuskegee Airmen, Autumn will start watching NFL games and buying the products they advertise.
 
Last edited:
"Nike, I love your gear, but you exhaust my spirit on this one. Your new ad with Colin Kapernick, I get the message, but that sacrificing everything thing…. It just doesn’t play out here. Sacrificing what exactly? A career?

"Taking a stand, or rather a knee, against the flag which has covered the caskets of so many who actually did sacrifice everything for something they believe in, that we all believe in? Well, the irony of your ad..it almost leaves me speechless. Were you trying to be insulting?

"Maybe you are banking on the fact we won’t take the time to see your lack of judgement in using words that just don’t fit. Maybe you are also banking on us not seeing Nike as kneeling before the flag. Or maybe you want us to see you exactly that way. I don’t know. All I know is, I was actually in the market for some new kicks and at least for now, I’ve never been more grateful for Under Armour."

-- Taya Renae Kyle, the widow of US Navy SEAL Chris Kyle (Sept 4, 2018)
 
Those who do not support Kaepernick’s right to protest are not patriots.

— Marsha L. Aleem, Lt Colonel U.S. Air Force

The individuals exercising their freedom of speech need and deserve far more respect than the flag.

— Baldwin Yen, U.S. Army

I was more likely to be killed by a police officer at home than by the Taliban.

-- Alec Gillis, U.S. Army

They’re forgetting the Tuskegee Airman.
I think when people say they don’t kneel for the anthem, they’re forgetting all the black and brown service members who served. They’re forgetting the Tuskegee Airman. When my dad served, the people he felt were his friends made jokes about how they’d hang him in their front yard when he came home from fighting side-by-side with white soldiers.

— Autumn, daughter of Tuskegee airman
I have referred to Umberto Eco's essay on fascism elsewhere

https://medium.com/@whatsinanameyou...ity-across-countries-and-history-146a294f9647

A few days later I saw the first American soldiers. They were African Americans. The first Yankee I met was a black man, Joseph, who introduced me to the marvels of Dick Tracy and Li’l Abner. His comic books were brightly colored and smelled good.

One of the officers (Major or Captain Muddy) was a guest in the villa of a family whose two daughters were my schoolmates. I met him in their garden where some ladies, surrounding Captain Muddy, talked in tentative French. Captain Muddy knew some French, too. My first image of American liberators was thus — after so many palefaces in black shirts — that of a cultivated black man in a yellow-green uniform saying: “Oui, merci beaucoup, Madame, moi aussi j’aime le champagne . . .” Unfortunately there was no champagne, but Captain Muddy gave me my first piece of Wrigley’s Spearmint and I started chewing all day long. At night I put my wad in a water glass, so it would be fresh for the next day.

1. The first feature of Ur-Fascism is the cult of tradition. Traditionalism is of course much older than fascism. Not only was it typical of counter-revolutionary Catholic thought after the French revolution, but it was born in the late Hellenistic era, as a reaction to classical Greek rationalism. In the Mediterranean basin, people of different religions (most of them indulgently accepted by the Roman Pantheon) started dreaming of a revelation received at the dawn of human history. This revelation, according to the traditionalist mystique, had remained for a long time concealed under the veil of forgotten languages — in Egyptian hieroglyphs, in the Celtic runes, in the scrolls of the little known religions of Asia.

This new culture had to be syncretistic. Syncretism is not only, as the dictionary says, “the combination of different forms of belief or practice”; such a combination must tolerate contradictions. Each of the original messages contains a silver of wisdom, and whenever they seem to say different or incompatible things it is only because all are alluding, allegorically, to the same primeval truth.

As a consequence, there can be no advancement of learning. Truth has been already spelled out once and for all, and we can only keep interpreting its obscure message.

One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements. The most influential theoretical source of the theories of the new Italian right, Julius Evola, merged the Holy Grail with The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, alchemy with the Holy Roman and Germanic Empire. The very fact that the Italian right, in order to show its open-mindedness, recently broadened its syllabus to include works by De Maistre, Guenon, and Gramsci, is a blatant proof of syncretism.

If you browse in the shelves that, in American bookstores, are labeled as New Age, you can find there even Saint Augustine who, as far as I know, was not a fascist. But combining Saint Augustine and Stonehenge — that is a symptom of Ur-Fascism.
 
"Nike, I love your gear, but you exhaust my spirit on this one. Your new ad with Colin Kapernick, I get the message, but that sacrificing everything thing…. It just doesn’t play out here. Sacrificing what exactly? A career?

"Taking a stand, or rather a knee, against the flag which has covered the caskets of so many who actually did sacrifice everything for something they believe in, that we all believe in? Well, the irony of your ad..it almost leaves me speechless. Were you trying to be insulting?

"Maybe you are banking on the fact we won’t take the time to see your lack of judgement in using words that just don’t fit. Maybe you are also banking on us not seeing Nike as kneeling before the flag. Or maybe you want us to see you exactly that way. I don’t know. All I know is, I was actually in the market for some new kicks and at least for now, I’ve never been more grateful for Under Armour."

-- Taya Renae Kyle, the widow of US Navy SEAL Chris Kyle (Sept 4, 2018)

Maybe they should cover the coffins with a copy of the Bill of Rights instead

When do people wake up to the fact that one is only cloth and the other are our principles?
 
Maybe they should cover the coffins with a copy of the Bill of Rights instead

When do people wake up to the fact that one is only cloth and the other are our principles?

What was her view on Trump's mockery of McCain?
 

Back
Top Bottom