It’s a tax deductible vacation.
It’s a tax deductible vacation.
It looks like a rather poor experiment to verify Barnum's law to me. It reminds me of Meldrum's attempt with his cancelled "World Conference on Relict Hominoids" in South Africa.There's a **** load more interesting places I'd travel to for 6 Gs. Plus, I wouldn't have put up with a bunch of nitwits.
...It reminds me of Meldrum's attempt with his cancelled "World Conference on Relict Hominoids" in South Africa.
It really took a staggering amount of dumb to come up with an idea that could make the eager-to-be-credulous-all-one-God-faith BLAARGers say "Eh, I don't think so." It was akin to wanting to hold a World Elephant Conference™ in Branson, Missouri and only inviting Africans to attend. ^Too bad indeed (his blimp project was great too...).
I see my first instinct was correct. So Smithsonian is on the tabloid gravy train, eh? What a piss-poor piece of journalism, if I could even stretch that term. What a waste of my time. What were you doing during our lengthy interview — checking your twitter account?
That probably is the end of the article. The final two sentences are...I was wondering about that also. If you hit the 1 of 5 buttons you get a little more but it still seems truncated.
Which look like conclusion sentences. That's how you end an article like this.Smithsonian said:On the internet, Bigfoot has found a habitat much more hospitable than North American forests. It turns out that Bigfoot does not need to exist in order to live forever.
One of the replies is from Richard Freeman who is a Brit and Director of the Centre for Fortean Zoology.Yes the comments are also hilarious. Perfect: the Americans who want to believe, just showin’ off the stupid.
According to an extremely reliable source, Meldrum haz a HILARIOUS tantrum regarding the article in September’s Smithsonian Magazine.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/why-so-many-people-still-believe-in-bigfoot-180970045/
He (and by “he” I mean Prof. Meldrum) sent this in an email to Ben Crair, the writer of the piece.
"I see my first instinct was correct. So Smithsonian is on the tabloid gravy train, eh? What a piss-poor piece of journalism, if I could even stretch that term. What a waste of my time. What were you doing during our lengthy interview — checking your twitter account?"
WARNING: not safe for your irony meter.
Note how the psychopathy is present in even the most trivial of his writings. The concern is only about himself. Somehow he's the victim because of the amount of time he supposedly "wasted" talking to this guy who in the end gave him the credence he deserves, none. Yet Meldrum makes no mention nor has any concerns for any of the galactic amount of hours of "wasted time" he as Don "The Snake" Meldrum, That's the problem. Not a single mention of Meldrum in the article. A crime of lese-majesty, literallyYou have to pay for the rest of the article? Or does it just end there?
Because I see no Meldrum quotes in the part I saw.
The comments are priceless, I want Parcher to breakdown those commenters and pair them with their Bigfoot Forum names.
That's the problem. Not a single mention of Meldrum in the article. A crime of lese-majesty, literally.
If asked, "Hey you interviewed Meldrum for this article but didn't use him? why not?"
He'd say, I interviewed a guy just like him for my "Monster Parties- Fact or Fiction?" article
See 0:36 when the expert 'Doctor' gives his opinion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP1bg1R5XQc
This is Meldrum pitching the blimp project. Amazing fantasy.Published on Oct 14, 2013
A general interview with ISU's Dr. Jeff Meldrum. The raw video was intended as a pilot for investors in a large production company on the East Coast.The questions are about what attracted Prof. Meldrum to the study of cryptids and what he is doing as far as ongoing research.