Cont: The Trump Presidency IX: Nein, Nein!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump Likely to Replace Jeff Sessions 'Sooner Rather Than Later'
The new attorney generals top priority: "Lock her up!"
You do realize that in order to "lock her up", you need to 1) find some law that she has broken, 2) make sure that that law would result in jail time, 3) actually press charges and 4) have her convicted in a court of law.

ETA: In my opinion it will never happen regardless of who they get as attorney general. They won't even TRY to press charges, because Trump et al would lose in court, which would be embarrassing.
 
Last edited:
Trump Likely to Replace Jeff Sessions 'Sooner Rather Than Later'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Thursday he believes President Trump will name a new attorney general "sooner rather than later" in his first term.

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, Graham said Trump is "entitled to an attorney general he has faith in."

"The idea of having a new attorney general in the first term of President Trump's administration, I think is very likely," said Graham.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/08/2...r-rather-later (Aug 23, 2018)

The new attorney generals top priority: "Lock her up!"


Today is only Thursday. It is traditional to do these things on a Saturday.

To maximize effectiveness, do it shortly before balloting starts, so it is fresh in everyone's mind as they vote.
 


There's a long history of Republican politicians using music at rallies and other events without bothering to get permission. The one that sticks in my mind is the Dropkick Murphys telling Scott Walker "please stop using our music in any way...we literally hate you !!!"
I half suspect that they believe that all songs are owned by the record companies, not the artists, and as corporations they will automatically support the Republicans, so permission is assumed.
 
There's a long history of Republican politicians using music at rallies and other events without bothering to get permission. The one that sticks in my mind is the Dropkick Murphys telling Scott Walker "please stop using our music in any way...we literally hate you !!!"
I half suspect that they believe that all songs are owned by the record companies, not the artists, and as corporations they will automatically support the Republicans, so permission is assumed.
No they think they can do what they want, and given the life most have led they aren't being stupid coming to that conclusion, it's based on empirical evidence.
 
You do realize that in order to "lock her up", you need to 1) find some law that she has broken, 2) make sure that that law would result in jail time, 3) actually press charges and 4) have her convicted in a court of law.

ETA: In my opinion it will never happen regardless of who they get as attorney general. They won't even TRY to press charges, because Trump et al would lose in court, which would be embarrassing.

I think it is clear that S and A likes the idea of Trump be able to send his opponents to prison without much in the way of trial.
In fact, I think S and A loves the idea of a Trump dictatorship, period.
 
You do realize that in order to "lock her up", you need to 1) find some law that she has broken, 2) make sure that that law would result in jail time, 3) actually press charges and 4) have her convicted in a court of law.

ETA: In my opinion it will never happen regardless of who they get as attorney general. They won't even TRY to press charges, because Trump et al would lose in court, which would be embarrassing.
You have never heard of Guitanamo Bay? This is where the US locks up people who have never been tried.
 
Nah, didn't work for The Boss and Reagan.

Reagan never actually used "Born in the USA" in one of his campaigns..coming from a Show Biz background he knew better then that....but referenced it in a couple of speeches.
 
Reagan never actually used "Born in the USA" in one of his campaigns..coming from a Show Biz background he knew better then that....but referenced it in a couple of speeches.

I'm pretty sure it was played at some of his rallies until the boss complained. But then again, my memory might be bad.
 
There's a long history of Republican politicians using music at rallies and other events without bothering to get permission. The one that sticks in my mind is the Dropkick Murphys telling Scott Walker "please stop using our music in any way...we literally hate you !!!"
I half suspect that they believe that all songs are owned by the record companies, not the artists, and as corporations they will automatically support the Republicans, so permission is assumed.

I don't know how it works in the US, but in the UK if you have a public performance license then you have permission to play anything you want to. The rights organisations then work out (guesstimate) how many times any particular artists' songs have been played in public and assign royalties to the relevant copyright holder accordingly.

I imagine that the US system is very similar. I certainly can't imagine that you have to get permission from each individual artist that you want to play a song of. Can you imagine the hassle that a wedding DJ would have to go through? Especially when there's a request for a song they don't have the license to. Rather than just downloading it, as happens now, they'd have to download it and contact the band mid-gig. And think how much hassle it'd be for a band to have to individually grant each DJ/restaurant/pub/music venue/festival organiser/etc. the rights to use their music.

Seems untenable to me. So I'd imagine that the Trump rallies have a music license, and that with that license they can play Aerosmith if they want to, regardless of how Aerosmith feel about it. Aerosmith might be able to bring some kind of civil case to try to get them to stop, but I'm not even sure I could see that being successful.
 
I don't know how it works in the US, but in the UK if you have a public performance license then you have permission to play anything you want to. The rights organisations then work out (guesstimate) how many times any particular artists' songs have been played in public and assign royalties to the relevant copyright holder accordingly.

I imagine that the US system is very similar. I certainly can't imagine that you have to get permission from each individual artist that you want to play a song of. Can you imagine the hassle that a wedding DJ would have to go through? Especially when there's a request for a song they don't have the license to. Rather than just downloading it, as happens now, they'd have to download it and contact the band mid-gig. And think how much hassle it'd be for a band to have to individually grant each DJ/restaurant/pub/music venue/festival organiser/etc. the rights to use their music.

Seems untenable to me. So I'd imagine that the Trump rallies have a music license, and that with that license they can play Aerosmith if they want to, regardless of how Aerosmith feel about it. Aerosmith might be able to bring some kind of civil case to try to get them to stop, but I'm not even sure I could see that being successful.

I'm not sure how the royalty issues are dealt with, but it is a bit of PR problem when you start playing the music of an artist who bad mouths you for playing his music. It's one thing to play a various mixture of songs. But if you play a particular artist's song as part of your intro or right after you finish, you're doing more than genetically playing music. You are creating a theme.... it gives the audience the idea that the artist endorses you.
 
You do realize that in order to "lock her up", you need to 1) find some law that she has broken, 2) make sure that that law would result in jail time, 3) actually press charges and 4) have her convicted in a court of law.

ETA: In my opinion it will never happen regardless of who they get as attorney general. They won't even TRY to press charges, because Trump et al would lose in court, which would be embarrassing.

I just assumed it was another "Lindsay Graham is gay and thus akin to a woman" joke. Unless, of course, he simply wants Sessions to make up charges to have Clinton arrested - a great way to demonstrate that you are willing go grossly abuse power, and thus a call for open rebellion.

So it couldn't be that latter one cough.

I am dubious about the wisdom of land confiscation is S.A. (it just worked great in Zimbabwe) but Trump's tweet is a blatant appeal to bigotry. I wonder if Trump will not openly play the racism card in the mid terms.

I never doubted that he would - it's one of few issues that he has been loud and consistent on since years before his official campaign announcement. Even his hatred of China is contradicted by his apparent love of ZTE.
 
No they think they can do what they want, and given the life most have led they aren't being stupid coming to that conclusion, it's based on empirical evidence.
”Hey, I paid a good 99 cents for this CD from the Columbia Record Club. It’s mine to play wherever I want.”
 
Last edited:
White House kills bipartisan bill to protect elections:

A bill that would have significantly bolstered the nation’s defenses against electoral interference has been held up in the Senate at the behest of the White House, which opposed the proposed legislation, according to congressional sources.

The Secure Elections Act, introduced by Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., in December 2017, had co-sponsorship from two of the Senate’s most prominent liberals, Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., as well as from conservative stalwart Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and consummate centrist Susan Collins, R-Me.

Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., was set to conduct a markup of the bill on Wednesday morning in the Senate Rules Committee, which he chairs. The bill had widespread support, including from some of the committee’s Republican members, and was expected to come to a full Senate vote in October. But then the chairman’s mark, as the critical step is known, was canceled, and no explanation was given.

Linky.
 
I believe DJs and clubs and such are supposed to pay a licensing fee which allows a certain usage of music.

Tonight's exchange on CNN between Chris Cuomo and KellyAnne Conway was grueling.
 
Last edited:
Tonight's exchange on CNN between Chris Cuomo and KellyAnne Conway was grueling.

I caught the part where Cuomo kept talking over her BS to say people don't trust Trump because he lies a lot and she said people don't trust Trump because of "you people." I couldn't take any more.
 
Trump Tweets

"I have authorized an emergency disaster declaration to provide Hawaii the necessary support ahead of #HurricaneLane. Our teams are closely coordinating with the state and local authorities. You are in our thoughts!"

They haven't finished in PR yet.
It's a safe bet there won't be much damage. It's down to cat 3 and skirting well the the west.

~500 people watching the live Waimea Bay cam, nothing happening yet. My cousin's in Honolulu, not worried yet.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom