• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which laws?

Copyright law is generally appropriate to works of fiction.

It reminds me of the Baigent and Leigh suit against Dan Brown for allegedly plaigiarising "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" in "The Da Vinci Code." One of the main objections to their case was that they insisted that their work was a historical study rather than a work of fiction, which meant that they couldn't sue Brown for using it as a source of plot elements; only if they'd admitted that the whole thing was made up could they have asserted copyright.

So markie is in a cleft stick here. Either hydrinos are protected by IP law, which would require Mills to admit they're fictitious, or they're not, in which case there's no reason for nobody else to have detected them.

Dave
 
http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/493-Old-Trenton-Rd-East-Windsor-NJ/12324020/

(I notice that the rug at the entrance in the 3rd photo still says "Blacklight Power".)

Hopefully BLP will be able to get more investment capital soon. It would be sad if they had to declare bankruptcy and shutdown because they were unable to pay the rent!

At least the investors will be able to walk away with all of those valuable patents!

I noticed this at their facilities link:
https://brilliantlightpower.com/facilities/
Brilliant Light is working on establishing a licensing office in Miami FL wherein it projects to hire 80 members of a global licensing team within the next 24 months. Foreign offices to provide a regional presence will be established as the licensing activity expands.

I went to the Wayback Machine internet archive and looked at a snapshot of the same link taken from January 26th of 2016. It says the same thing.

Have they established a licensing office with 80 employees in Miami yet? It's been 30 months since the January 26th, 2016 snapshot.
 
Have they established a licensing office with 80 employees in Miami yet? It's been 30 months since the January 26th, 2016 snapshot.

A cynic might say that it was just an excuse to take an extended vacation in Florida at company expense.

That same page says "Brilliant Light owns and occupies a 53,000 square foot modern research and development facility..."

That seems to be at odds with the research done by Frozen Flame.

This suggests that Randy is the owner of the property where Brilliant Light Power is located and pays himself ~$925,000 in rent yearly
 
Last edited:
A cynic might say that it was just an excuse to take an extended vacation in Florida at company expense.

That same page says "Brilliant Light owns and occupies a 53,000 square foot modern research and development facility..."

That seems to be at odds with the research done by Frozen Flame.
I wonder how the Millsian Inc. software (named Millsian) is coming along.
 
Is the Great Randino cashing out?

1) Brilliant Light Power is located ("headquartered") at 493 Old Trenton Rd, Cranbury, NJ (reference: BLP website**). This property is sometimes listed as being in neighboring East Windsor rather than Cranbury.

2) Also headquartered at the same address is "Blacklight Real Estate" with contact Randell Mills which has estimated revenue of $925,288 (reference: Buzzfile, search companies located at 493 Old Trenton Rd, Cranbury, NJ**).


I seem to recall this came up a few years ago, when someone was wondering how Mills was "making money off a scam" when his salary was relatively low compared to the money BLP has taken in from investors. But yeah, dodges like this are how a lot of scammers, or just generally sketchy business people, generate extra income for themselves, while making it slightly less obvious to others who might have a vested interest in where the money goes. If Mills just paid himself almost a million dollars out of the funds, someone would surely object. But how can you object to paying rent on the building? That's just a cost of doing business.

Compare this to Trump, who's making bank off the US government just by going on vacation to his own resorts. The Secret Service is required, by law, to pay its own way, which means renting rooms and facilities from Trump himself. Perfectly legal, but fundamentally sketchy.

That is, just what you'd expect from both Trump and Mills.
 
Yeah, YEAH maybe Atlantis was destroyed by their waiting centuries for a guy to produce hydrinos - he never did - or maybe Imhotep used hydrino powered anti-grav to build the pyramids........I mean if markie can make stuff up so can I.

I think there's a great deal of Hydrino History that's been obscured throughout time if we were imaginative enough to mine it all...
Wonder how Stonehenge and the Bermuda Triangle fits in to it all, I mean, besides the obvious connections.
 
I noticed this at their facilities link:
https://brilliantlightpower.com/facilities/


I went to the Wayback Machine internet archive and looked at a snapshot of the same link taken from January 26th of 2016. It says the same thing.

Have they established a licensing office with 80 employees in Miami yet? It's been 30 months since the January 26th, 2016 snapshot.

Before that it was Black Light Power (dot) com.

If anyone is interested in a little historical research the full archive of that can be accessed at

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://blacklightpower.com/*

The syntax is critical. Adjust the root URL to access the archive of any site.
 
A trip down memory lane. From the SECOND SHAREHOLDER NEWSLETTER '97:

The design and research on the hydrogen gas energy cell has culminated in a scaled-up prototype energy cell design. The goal is a BlackLight power cell which operates in a self sustaining manner ("Self Sustaining Cell") defined as producing sufficient power to maintain the operating temperature without input power to heat the reaction chamber.
...
The Company anticipates that successful test results from its Self Sustaining Cell and UV spectroscopy, and patent issuance all projected for the first quarter of 1998 will permit the Company to establish joint ventures and/or licensing agreements for the commercial use of the hydrogen gas energy cells.
...
The Company is still reviewing possible electrical and heating applications for its technology including modifying its proposed Self Sustaining Cell so that it can be fit with a converter and a generator to make electricity. The Company plans a second scale-up to a 100 kW power plant that comprises a 1 to 5,000 scale pilot power plant to serve as a test bed for boiler retrofits or replacements of existing power plants.
 
Interesting.

Looks like Brilliant Light Power is a subsidiary of Conectiv Solutions, LLC which is a subsidiary of Exelon, a multi billion dollar energy corporation.

Why would Randall Mills be needing investment money from private investors with this kind of backing? This is weird to me.

Anyone care to weigh in?
Quoting myself because... really?

No one cares that Mills' company is apparently owned by a Fortune 100 energy corp?
 
Quoting myself because... really?

No one cares that Mills' company is apparently owned by a Fortune 100 energy corp?
I'm not sure why you think this is new or interesting. Why is it a surprise that one of the investors is one of the investors?? That's basically all you've pointed out here. Yes, his funding comes from his "funders".
 
I am mildly interested. "Subsidiary" implies a controlling interest. It would be nice to know more.

OK. I don't know enough about it to know if "subsidiary", as in controlling interest, is correct. It seems unlikely given the number of investors he has.

Mills has funding from a number of similar sources. A handful for small power companies "invested" in him.

Click through to the cited sources in the Wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power
 
From 2012-07-28 press release

A 100 W unit is planned for completion by the end of 2012, and a 1.5 kiloWatt (kW) pilot unit that can serve the residential power market, as an initial target commercial application, is expected to be operational by 2013. (One kW is equal to 1000 W, and 1.5 kW is the typical, average power consumption of a US home.)
 
Mills has funding from a number of similar sources. A handful for small power companies "invested" in him.

Assuming you mean the power companies which signed technology transfer agreements, I can report that, to my knowledge, they invested nothing. Several years ago I contacted the guy at New Mexico Power Cooperative (I think that's the name, but the search function doesn't go back far enough to confirm it) who dealt with the Mills agreement.

He was pleasant, but said that he had given up on ever hearing from Mills again. Since his company had not actually paid anything to Mills there was no pressing reason to pursue the matter. He said he checked on the web every year or so, but had given up hope of any changes.
 
Quoting myself because... really?

No one cares that Mills' company is apparently owned by a Fortune 100 energy corp?

I'm going to chime in with the suggestion that they're an investor, but are unlikely to have a controlling interest. If they had a controlling interest then they'd have put some competent scientists and patent lawyers on the project to protect their investment.

Unless of course this is all a big energy con to keep the small investors from investing in something that might actually prove a threat to their existing business models. From a conspiratorial mindset it would be very clever to stifle up-and-coming competition with a vampire failure project like BLP. Of course, the people being fooled by such a program would never believe they were being fooled. I believe it was Mark Twain who observed that it is easier to fool a man than to convince him he's being fooled. If such a conspiracy were real, anyone trying to expose it would, ironically, be dismissed as a shill of the very big energy interests behind the conspiracy! It's X-Files meets Kafka.

By the way, if there ARE any big energy interests reading this and I've stumbled onto some deep, dark truth about your methods of operation, I'd much rather sell out and join you enthusiastically than become a target or need to be "silenced" in some way.
 
Last edited:
Quoting myself because... really?

No one cares that Mills' company is apparently owned by a Fortune 100 energy corp?

I'm going to chime in with the suggestion that they're an investor, but are unlikely to have a controlling interest.

Hasn't this gotten a bit confused? No Fortune 100 has invested in BLP, let alone bought a controlling interest, correct?

There are very indirect connections to Fortune 100 (even Fortune 5) due to connections through subsidiaries or former employers but no Fortune 100 invested in BLP as far as I know.
 
I'm going to chime in with the suggestion that they're an investor, but are unlikely to have a controlling interest. If they had a controlling interest then they'd have put some competent scientists and patent lawyers on the project to protect their investment.
Thanks, I appreciate some attention here.

However, it lists BLP as a subsidiary of a subsidiary as I said. That means that the parent company(ies) own a controlling interest in BLP.

Whether or not the parent companies actually have their own scientists "working" with BLP is irrelevant for my point which is how can the Mills shills justify him acting as if he's the lone ranger who needs investment money in order to operate the business.

In this instance, I very well could be pointing out nothing of importance, I admit that so maybe being ignored is fine and understandable.

I am asking the people who are more knowledgeable about business operations if this is a strange thing or not.

I do understand that it is legally considered a separate business which may not receive any funding from the parent companies (I read that sometimes the "bigger" company is the subsidiary and not necessarily the owning corp) but I wonder if people would still be giving money to BLP in the full knowledge that a Fortune 100 energy (nuclear) corp owns a controlling interest.

Maybe that's a selling point. Combined with the previous knowledge of Mills being the property owner and getting a good chunk of money every year just for rent and so on, to me it just continues to smell rather funny.



Unless of course this is all a big energy con to keep the small investors from investing in something that might actually prove a threat to their existing business models. From a conspiratorial mindset it would be very clever to stifle up-and-coming competition with a vampire failure project like BLP.
Yes, I don't think it's anything like a conspiracy theory that big energy corps invest and own alternative energy companies. It's obvious that this is done and could even be defended as the corps ensuring their continued dominance as well as being able to pivot into clean energy if it ever finally gets pushed through as a governmental policy.
 
However, it lists BLP as a subsidiary of a subsidiary as I said. That means that the parent company(ies) own a controlling interest in BLP.
What is "it"?

I do understand that it is legally considered a separate business which may not receive any funding from the parent companies (I read that sometimes the "bigger" company is the subsidiary and not necessarily the owning corp) but I wonder if people would still be giving money to BLP in the full knowledge that a Fortune 100 energy (nuclear) corp owns a controlling interest.
What Fortune 100 energy (nuclear) corp are you talking about?
 
Last edited:
Yes, I don't think it's anything like a conspiracy theory that big energy corps invest and own alternative energy companies. It's obvious that this is done and could even be defended as the corps ensuring their continued dominance as well as being able to pivot into clean energy if it ever finally gets pushed through as a governmental policy.

This con operation does have assets, right? Then it has a balance sheet reflecting the value of land, buildings, equipment, inventory, intellectual property, etc. that it owns.

Now, regardless of whether a billion dollars was thrown at this hoax, it owns things that have current value based upon at a minimum, salvage.

Someone who produces energy might be interested in, at a minimum, the salvage value of a hoax like this. Because the equipment and such is in that industrial sector.

They might have people that are interested in what the con artists are doing for their own reasons. They might be easily adapted to something else.

It might be worth next to nothing. I'd be interested to know. But if it is, there isn't much a parent company is going to care about. It's like an old dumpster in the back of a lot you don't use much. Not in the way, not worth bothering about. And the dumpster might transform into gold one day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom