Delphic Oracle
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2016
- Messages
- 6,416
I decline your invitation to baselessly speculate.What do you think lies beneath all the redacted parts if not supporting evidence?
I decline your invitation to baselessly speculate.What do you think lies beneath all the redacted parts if not supporting evidence?
I decline your invitation to baselessly speculate.
In lieu of evidence, assertions that some hypothetical evidence exists somewhere will do?
The judges SAW all the redacted bits. That is the evidence they acted on.
Who's burden is it to prove what in this instance?
With a hint of irony, I think.That's OK. It was a rhetorical question anyway.
With a hint of irony, I think.
When viewed through the blinders of Trump Worship, you are indeed correct.[emoji849]Now, now...that's just baseless speculation.![]()
And of course what's clear from the unredacted bits is that the judges didn't depend solely on the Steele Dossier, and that Nunes is a lying toe-rag.The judges SAW all the redacted bits. That is the evidence they acted on.
And of course what's clear from the unredacted bits is that the judges didn't depend solely on the Steele Dossier, and that Nunes is a lying toe-rag.
...when the pair arrived at the Justice Department to review the electronic communication, officials were caught off-guard by his next move. Nunes -- sitting with a copy of the document in an unopened folder directly in front of him -- opted not to read it, according to four sources with knowledge of the situation.
It was the FBI's to prove before a judge that there was enough evidence to issue a FISA warrant against Page. Which it did. Four times. Four judges.
There isn't a clear chain-of-evidence position to take given the general murkiness of the situation. This is exactly the kind of stuff that doesn't hurt Trump. If it puts pressure on Manafort, it has some potential value, but it's too convoluted to use against Manafort, let alone Trump.Is it bad if your daughter describes you as "without any moral or legal compass" and says that you were involved in murders?
Trump Tweets
"So President Obama knew about Russia before the Election. Why didn’t he do something about it? Why didn’t he tell our campaign? Because it is all a big hoax, that’s why, and he thought Crooked Hillary was going to win!!!"
Trump Tweets
"So President Obama knew about Russia before the Election. Why didn’t he do something about it? Why didn’t he tell our campaign? Because it is all a big hoax, that’s why, and he thought Crooked Hillary was going to win!!!"
Is it bad if your daughter describes you as "without any moral or legal compass" and says that you were involved in murders?
Remember when Obama warned Trump not to hire Flynn as NSA? Daft Taft responded to that warning by hiring Mike Flynn as NSA.
It's kind of amusing that Page is saying the redacted FISA application shows how ridiculous the charges against him are when we only see about a quarter of the total document. There are still pages that are completely redacted. I might agree that the charges aren't supported in the application, if I only say what wasn't redacted. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say there's lots of really interesting stuff about Page under all that black magic marker.
I get it about Nunes. Care to speculate why Lindsay Graham doubled down after the FISA warrant was released?As I said, what they show is that Nunes was lying about pretty much everything he said about the FISA applications - and since it was actually Trey Gowdy that looked at the applications, it's on him as well.
Another part - the sections that don't mention the Steele dossier, and do list other evidence, just kept increasing in length as time went on, indicating that they were getting more and more information as the monitoring of him went on.
![]()
No, they don't. But you knew that.
In this case, of course, that analogy addressed something a bit different than the gross misstatement that you actually made, of course, but what it addressed is, far too frequently, what that line of argument is used to try to actually do. Again, of course, you knew that. So why play the fool?