Cont: Breaking: Mueller Grand Jury charges filed, arrests as soon as Monday pt 2

[NoahFence]

The indictment notes that the Russians had been going after the Clinton campaign since April 2016, but also notes that on July 27, for the first time they tried to spearfish another Clinton account "for the first time."

That was also the day that Trump said "Russia I hope you can find Hillary's missing emails."

/told y'all it all came back to Hillary's cowboy server!

In an absolutely shocking turn of events, you seem to be implying something with no evidence at all.

 

[NoahFence]

The 11-count indictment includes charges of conspiracy by the Russian intelligence officials against the United States, money laundering and attempts to break into state boards of elections and other government agencies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/us/politics/mueller-indictment-russian-intelligence-hacking.html

Isn't that very close to an act of war?

It very well may be - but not with the current spineless man-whore at the helm and with his army of idiots that do nothing but drool at this fool.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Pics or it didn't happen?

It needs something. If these Russians tried to board a flight to the US, how would the FBI know?

Obviously, there isnt much out there right now. But I'm not convinced of their existence.

 

[The Big Dog]

I'm sure conservatives would be fine with Clinton sitting down with Putin if Russia had hacked the RNC and our own government agencies in an effort to help her win. Right, guys? Right?

Why would we hold her to a different standard than Obama ??

 

[Beelzebuddy]

Well, the timing is clearly sending a message, but to whom? Trump is too dense for a warning, so Putin then? "Hey FYI we know everything, if you could cut him loose now that'd be great?"

Maybe Trump can ask Putin to extradite these defalcators when they meet on Monday.

Do you think he should? You seem a little out of character, so I don't know if you're being sarcastic.

I think he'll apologize to Putin for the trouble, call it a "witch hunt" on twitter a few more times, give up some ridiculously disproportionate concession for a vague promise not to do it again (see: North Korea "talks"), then try to spin that as having been tough.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

That makes no sense at all, c'mon.

Sure it does.

Before the Daniels thing came out, people were saying that the pee tape couldn't be credible because Trump was shameless and therefore couldn't be blackmailed over having hookers in in room, or having them pee on the bed. Now the Daniels thing has come out we know that there are things of a sexual nature that Trump is susceptible to blackmail over. This means that the objection that he couldn't be blackmailed over the pee tape is less credible.

Plus if you believed that, then you would have to agree that strzok and page were as well, and given the fact that they were working under the Obama regime at the time, where their ultimate boss snuggled up to the perp's husband on the tarmac, it seems that you really ought to be worried about what awful things these clown shows did in cahoots with McCabe.

I don't even know what this is supposed to mean, let alone why I'm supposed to agree with it.

 

[NoahFence]

It needs something. If these Russians tried to board a flight to the US, how would the FBI know?

Obviously, there isnt much out there right now. But I'm not convinced of their existence.

Now I'm doubly confused.

They indicted 12 Russians that don't exist? The FBI would know because they're the *********** FBI for chrissake.

 

[Shalamar]

I'm sure conservatives would be fine with Clinton sitting down with Putin if Russia had hacked the RNC and our own government agencies in an effort to help her win. Right, guys? Right?

It's only bad if the 'leftists' do it. The posts from illusory superior canines show that quite handily.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Now I'm doubly confused.

They indicted 12 Russians that don't exist? The FBI would know because they're the *********** FBI for chrissake.

The FBI doesn't get the benefit of the doubt.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

The indictment notes that the Russians had been going after the Clinton campaign since April 2016, but also notes that on July 27, for the first time they tried to spearfish another Clinton account "for the first time."

That was also the day that Trump said "Russia I hope you can find Hillary's missing emails."

/told y'all it all came back to Hillary's cowboy server!

You count Russia trying to hack Clinton's account hours after publicly asked to do so by Trump as a win for Trump?

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Anyway, these indictments are confirmation that Roger Stone during the campaign was in contact with, and publicly praised Russian agents who were actively working against America.

 

[Fudbucker]

U.S. Candidate for Congress Asked For — And Received — Hacked DNC Emails From Russians

"Contained deep within the indictment, however, is a stunning bombshell, flagged by reporter Peter Hasson:

A candidate for U.S. Congress reached out to Guccifer on August 15, 2016, requesting the stolen documents. Russian intelligence officers responded, posing as Guccifer, and sent him stolen documents related to his opponent."

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/u-s-...and-received-hacked-dnc-emails-from-russians/

 

[The Big Dog]

You count Russia trying to hack Clinton's account hours after publicly asked to do so by Trump as a win for Trump?

no

 

[NoahFence]

The FBI doesn't get the benefit of the doubt.

Don't bob the thread.

12 indictments were handed out to actual, real people. Deal with it.

 

[Bob001]

You count Russia trying to hack Clinton's account hours after publicly asked to do so by Trump as a win for Trump?

It's at least possible that when Trump spoke, he already knew that the Russians were hacking the Dems accounts.

 

[Sabrina]

It needs something. If these Russians tried to board a flight to the US, how would the FBI know?

Obviously, there isnt much out there right now. But I'm not convinced of their existence.

How do you know they DON'T have pictures of the individuals?

Having worked in and around the government for the past nearly twenty years, I'd be the first to tell you that you don't give away ALL your information when making announcements of this type. The rank and file of people in this country don't NEED to know what these people look like; the appropriate agencies and personnel will be informed if/when they need to be.

The likelihood is that there are photographs and any number of other pieces of evidence pointing to the existence of these individuals; it'd be hard to argue otherwise, considering a grand jury of individuals found there to be enough evidence to hand down these indictments. We just don't need to see them because WE aren't involved in the actual investigation, nor have any of the individuals been arrested as of yet.

 

[Bob001]

Don't bob the thread.

12 indictments were handed out to actual, real people. Deal with it.

In addition to 19 or so previous indictments and five guilty pleas.

 

[BobTheCoward]

How do you know they DON'T have pictures of the individuals?

Having worked in and around the government for the past nearly twenty years, I'd be the first to tell you that you don't give away ALL your information when making annoucements of this type. The rank and file of people in this country don't NEED to know what these people look like; the appropriate agencies and personnel will be informed if/when they need to be.

The likelihood is that there are photographs and any number of other pieces of evidence pointing to the existence of these individuals; it'd be hard to argue otherwise, considering a grand jury of individuals found there to be enough evidence to hand down these indictments. We just don't need to see them because WE aren't involved in the actual investigation, nor have any of the individuals been arrested as of yet.

If they are not presenting me with the evidence Because they don't think I need to see it, then the skeptical position is to not be convinced by their claims. It is that simple.

 

[lomiller]

what does Trump's alleged affair have to do with this thread, nothing.

What does Strzok/Page repeated assignations, misfeasance, malfeasance, extraordinary bias and circumvention of the chain of command at the FBI have to do with it?

You have it backwards. Trump’s affair has relevance because it’s a potential leverage point Russia could have use to manipulate him. Even if it happened a Strzok Page relationship is just mud slinging that has no relevance to the investigation.

Two guesses what the Leftists want to focus on?

The one that potentially exposed the president of the US to blackmail and manipulation by a foreign power. The Right wing nutbars, of course, just ignore national security issues in favor of tawdry mudslinging.

 

[C_Felix]

nevermind