Huh? Since when is the pee tape sexual?
I think the reference is to the $130k payment to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about a sexual encounter that President Trump claims never happened.
Huh? Since when is the pee tape sexual?
Actually, it demonstrates that he's susceptible to being blackmailed over sexual matters, lending credibility to the pee tape.
I think the reference is to the $130k payment to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about a sexual encounter that President Trump claims never happened.
Huh? The pee tape doesn't have anything to do with Stormy Daniels. But the payment does go along with the black mailable aspect of this (which isn't what I'm questioning).
The pee tape is Trump vandalizing a bed the Obama's slept in by having prostitutes pee on it.
Derp
Serves me right for not reading carefully enough - sorry.
I think quite a few people would classify having hookers pee on a bed while you watch as a sexual thing - after all, if the key thing was to vandalise the bed then just pee on it yourself.
Huh? The pee tape doesn't have anything to do with Stormy Daniels. But the payment does go along with the black mailable aspect of this (which isn't what I'm questioning).
The pee tape is Trump vandalizing a bed the Obama's slept in by having prostitutes pee on it.
Excellent example of the Rule of So in action. Dream example actually.
thank you for that post!
As an aside, I very much enjoy modern usage of fairly archaic words. Gives things a bit of a “Pride and Prejudice” air.The Big Dog said:No actually they were using government equipment to set up their tawdry affairs.
Thank you for the explanation.It's not a bad mark on you; however, you don't understand things, you've said that.
I knew you didn't understand because you said you didn't understand why file format mattered. It does, bigly. If it's a jpeg file, can't really search it for names (outside of forensic ****) as it's not a text file. What would you search for?If it's an access, SQL, or even an Excel sheet then it's easily searchable. That's the difference between a data dump and *********** giving someone evidence related to the charges. Certain people see 2 "terabits (lol)" and say "oh mah gerdz, teh data dumpz".
When has anyone here received data that isn't categorized or organized in anyway? How?
Fair enough. I try not to, but I'm as human as the next replicant.I'm no more invested than you are, but the difference is I understand it a bit more. The same reason I don't really argue with you about medical ****. This is my job, just like that is yours.
As far as your snarky bull **** about the "points", you do it the same as everyone else here.
Strzok isn't the target, Mueller is. Republicans are appealing to the TV-court drama level of legal expertise which could undo the Mueller probe due to bias and a "fruit of the poison tree" (Dossier) BS.
In the end, it's a smokescreen to provide them with cover for not impeaching Trump.
BREAKING: Mueller indicts 12 Russian intelligence officers for "hacking" into various servers, including the DNC, Hillary's campaign, and trying to get access Trump's.
Maybe Trump can ask Putin to extradite these defalcators when they meet on Monday.
And 12 more indictments, of GRU officers:
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/mueller-rosenstein-russia-indictments/index.html
How many of these 12 people do we have pictures of?