Well thanks at least for acknowledging Haus (who taught Mills in his year of EE).
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3
- Thread starter Darat
- Start date
- Status
Well thanks at least for acknowledging Haus (who taught Mills in his year of EE).
I was merely providing a balancing view to JT's description of Mills' physics as magical.
Mills deals with all these things. For instance he calculates the bond energies of H3+ and D3+ and their hydrino variants, among other things. See 13.1 and 13.2 of his book.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
And time varying magnetic fields can do what?
Hint: it has to do with electrical fields.
Are the orbitspheres approaching each other now neutral?
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Once again I have no interest in his book.
Orbitspheres are not neutral but the atoms may be.
And why are you now talking time varying magnetic fields in this context? They would be magneto static for an atom. AFAIK only during an orbitsphere transition do time varying EM fields need addressing.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Great, so the charge of the Orbitspheres needs to be considered when they are in close proximity to each other, whether the atom as a whole is neutral or not.
Have you forgotten your electron pair explanation already, "Magnetism". So an approaching particle with "magnetic fields outside an electrically neutral atom" would represent a time varying magnetic field to whatever it approaches. Which again can do what?
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Seeing the drawing of round electromagnets on a Faraday channel, he probably should have gone for a couple of more years.
You're the one who initiated claims about who is smarter. Should I take advice from you that you're clearly not following yourself?
I have made the world a better place, if only slightly, within the limits of my modest powers.
I can imagine the same of anyone, but I see no evidence for it in Mills's case, and much evidence against it. The evidence strongly suggests that he has been making his living for his entire career on a phony free energy scam.
But if that evidence is misleading, and Mills has in fact discovered a method of producing energy for minimal cost and with minimal environmental consequences, he still has not made the world a better place. Quite the contrary, all he has achieved in that case, for decades so far, is to successfully withhold and conceal his discovery from anyone who might otherwise have brought those benefits into actual use.
(Just to show I have a good imagination, I'll admit it's conceivable that Mills is living on a tight budget or on inherited wealth, and secretly funneling most of the money he scams from rich stupid investors to kids in an orphanage somewhere. But in that case he still obviously wants everyone to think he's just a scammer or failed inventor so he can continue that heroic work, so there's no harm in my thinking exactly that. As implausible as that scenario might be, it's more plausible than that he's had a working "but not quite ready for commercial use" secret formula for free energy that no one else in the physical sciences or the energy industry has figured out or discovered independently for three decades.)
My conclusions are indeed very negative, but they're amply warranted by the available evidence. If Mills is not a scammer, he has made a concerted effort to resemble one while also failing to produce any results that benefit anyone.
A street sweeper makes the streets and sidewalks a little more sanitary and nicer to walk on. A prostitute provides sexual release for people who might be too insecure, unattractive, lazy, or busy to maintain conjugal personal relationships. A roofer keeps water out of people's indoor living and working spaces. Making the world a better place is not an unusual or particularly difficult accomplishment. The vast majority of people manage it.
All the available evidence indicates that Mills has not.
I'm not sure much about the near field, but in the farfield, no.
I don't think of it as a 'time varying magnetic field'. If a neutral hydrogen atom was moving then I see a moving static magnetic field. If it came in close proximity to another neutral atom it would effect the currents of charge of that atom's outer orbitsphere. What would result from that, like some degree of polarization, I'm not sure.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Parrots Mills delusion that like charges do not repel
The minimum energy configuration for 2 negatively charged spheres is as far away as each other as possible.
3 July 2018 markie: Parrots Mills delusion that like charges do not repel (2 negatively charged spheres = no H2 molecule).
The minimum energy configuration for 2 negatively charged spheres is as far away as each other as possible.
And 2 negatively charged probability clouds?
In the case of paired electrons in an orbital, the orbitspheres are entirely superimposed on each other.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Unthinking faith in Mills ignorance, delusions and lies in his book
53 items of ignorance and some lies from markie from his blind faith in Mills.
You are derailing from your unthinking faith in Mills ignorance, delusions and lies in his book.
53 items of ignorance and some lies from markie from his blind faith in Mills.
- 3 July 2018 markie: Parrots Mills delusion that like charges do not repel (2 negatively charged spheres = no H2 molecule).
- 3 July 2018 markie: False dichotomy idiocy (QED works and has negative energy states, Mills has delusions about negative curvature and imaginary velocity)
- 2 July 2018 markie: Brings up Mills blatant insanity of pseudoelectrons
!
- 29 June 2018 markie: Ignores the infinite? forces between 2 of Mills spheres with an infinite charge density and an infinite mass density in contact.
- 29 June 2018 markie: A statement from ignorance: cross section is part of scattering not an answer to a question about forces.
- 29 June 2018 markie: Parroting of BLP propaganda from 1998 in a Mills interview.
- 29 June 2018 markie: Ignores the infinite? forces between 2 of Mills spheres with an infinite charge density and an infinite mass density in contact.
- 26 June 2018 markie: Repeats his ignorance of the size of a hydrogen atom!
- 27 June 2018 markie: Does not know that Mills infinitely thin delusions are also charged [thus the problem with scattering of charged particles]!
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
More false dichotomy idiocy (working QM versus Mills delusions)
3 July 2018 markie: More false dichotomy idiocy (working QM versus Mills delusions)
Oh don't be coy. If you are referring to the extremely simplified diagram in the quarterly report just say so. The drawings in his 2004 MHD patent are a bit different.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Who was talking about "far" anything? You were speaking of approaching to make contact. At some point (to make contact) your Orbitspheres are going to be orders of magnitude closer to each other than they will be to either of the protons. Unless of course your orbitspheres are in contact with the protons, is that the case? Remember contact was your assertion and you do need to try to stay on track with that.
It don't make a dang bit of difference what you may or may not think of it as. What happens is a "moving static magnetic field" results in a time varying magnetic field in relation to whatever it is moving from or to. That time varying magnetic can induce an electrical field.
So you don't just have the proximity of charges producing a repelling force but also the possibility of induced potential.
Once again the interaction as elastic scattering or covalent bonding is essentially all electromagnetic and thus due to the interaction of electromagnetic fields. Trying to down play it as some interaction between neutrals or just proclaim "Magnetism" doesn't actually help you.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Parrots a Mills delusion of "orbitspheres are entirely superimposed"
Mills previous stupidity was ignoring the repulsion between 2 negative charged spheres. Now we have an alleged by markie total of delusion of 2 negatively charged, infinitely thin spheres being "superimposed".
This is basic electromagnetism. The Coulomb force between 2 charges goes to infinity as r goes to zero. So Mills is either completely deluded with having 2 negatively charged spheres on top of each other with r = 0 or maybe just wrong with a sphere having twice the charge of an electron.
3 July 2018 markie: Parrots a Mills delusion of "orbitspheres are entirely superimposed" for "paired electrons in an orbital"
Mills previous stupidity was ignoring the repulsion between 2 negative charged spheres. Now we have an alleged by markie total of delusion of 2 negatively charged, infinitely thin spheres being "superimposed".
This is basic electromagnetism. The Coulomb force between 2 charges goes to infinity as r goes to zero. So Mills is either completely deluded with having 2 negatively charged spheres on top of each other with r = 0 or maybe just wrong with a sphere having twice the charge of an electron.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
That wasn't "coy", the drawing is just plain stupid and I noted why before. Does that "2004 MHD patent" include a Faraday channel as well? If not, then the comparison would be stupid.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
And of course markie lies about Mill's GUTCP. There are no calculations of 2 hydrogen atoms approaching each other and binding which is what we are discussing.
There is a long section on the "hydrogen molecular ion" (2 protons and an electron) starting on page 393 with his hydrino delusions featured. The entire section is on formed ions. A bit of insanity in the next 20 or so pages is treating electrons as particles which he denies
!Equation 11.5 and 11.6 are the differential equations of motion for a particle of mass m in the case of a central field.
Bumpity bump bump
Per Mills, the shape of an electron goes from a flat disk to a sphere, when it is captured by an ion (or atom or ...). And back the other way when one is liberated.
As charge accelerates while the electron is doing its twist+, what EMR is emitted or absorbed?
What shape do electrons have in metals? superconductors?
How does the force between an orbitsphere and a pancake electron vary with distance?
Last edited:
- Status