Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
NoahFence said:
Yes, actually I am. Because they are run of the mill voters. Do you suspect they get more than one vote or something? Are you under the impression that nobody at the FBI is allowed a preference?

Sorry dude. Real life doesn't work that way.
Click to expand...

No one like these two should ever be in charge of anything that is supposed to be an impartial investigation. That is the point.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
I am shocked that The Big Dog, who has previously posted to support Horowitz in the part of this investigation that related to McCabe is now ignoring Horowitz's conclusions in order to focus on one, single text.
Click to expand...

I am shocked that you think that I have read a report that has not been released yet.

In fact I will go so far as to say that what was apparently leaked yesterday, may not be the final version of the report, which one would know if one would have read my earlier post 3090.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
I am shocked that you think that I have read a report that has not been released yet.
Click to expand...

I don't. I think you are ignoring the reported conclusions.

Still, if your only reason for ignoring those conclusions is that they have not officially been released yet, then can I take it that when they are and if they are as reported, that you will loudly and happily proclaim that all the claims of partisanship around Strzok and Page (including your most recent posts) were unfounded?
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
I don't. I think you are ignoring the reported conclusions.

Still, if your only reason for ignoring those conclusions is that they have not officially been released yet, then can I take it that when they are and if they are as reported, that you will loudly and happily proclaim that all the claims of partisanship around Strzok and Page (including your most recent posts) were unfounded?
Click to expand...

LMAO - no true skeptic would trust a bloomberg report, amiright ?

“We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,” Horowitz's report conclusions reads, according to Bloomberg.

Yeah, maybe that was a TEST version they floated just for giggles :rolleyes:
 
NoahFence said:
Yes, actually I am. Because they are run of the mill voters. Do you suspect they get more than one vote or something? Are you under the impression that nobody at the FBI is allowed a preference?

Sorry dude. Real life doesn't work that way.
Click to expand...

Ironic that you’d be the one to say it was about politics.
 
Bombshell:

We were deeply troubled by
text messages exchanged
between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or
created the appearance that investigative decisions
were impacted by bias or improper considerations.
Most of the text messages raising such questions
pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a
part of this review. Nonetheless, when one
senior FBI
official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia
investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to
another senior FBI official, Page, “No. No he won’t.
We’ll stop it” in response to her question “[Trump’s] not
ever going to bec
ome president, right? Right?!”, it is
not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even
more seriously, implies a willingness to take official
action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral
prospects. This is
antithetical to the
core
values of the
FBI
and the
Department of Justice.
We do not question that the FBI employees who sent
these messages are entitled to their own political views.
However, we believe using FBI devices to send the
messages discussed in Chapter Twelve
—particularly the
messages that intermix work
-related discussions with
political commentary
—potentially implicate provisions in
the FBI’s Offense Code and Penalty Guidelines. At a
minimum, we found that the employees’ use of FBI
systems and devices to send
the identified messages
demonstrated extremely poor judgment and a gross
lack of professionalism. We therefore refer this
information to the FBI for its handling and consideration
of whether the messages sent by the five employees
listed above violated the FBI’s Offense Code of Conduct
Click to expand...

Referral to FBI from the OIG based on bias in connection with FBI Investigations!

Link https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
 
Last edited:
The IG concluded that former FBI director James Comey's decision to not inform his bosses about what he planned to say about the end of the Clinton email investigation was "extraordinary and insubordinate."

Developing....
 
The Big Dog said:
The IG concluded that former FBI director James Comey's decision to not inform his bosses about what he planned to say about the end of the Clinton email investigation was "extraordinary and insubordinate."

Developing....
Click to expand...

Looks like another fun thing for you people to investigate.

Good luck! :rolleyes:
 
Breaking Clinton used her Cowboy server to communicate with Obama!

"A paragraph summarizing the factors that led
the FBI to assess that it was possible that
hostile actors accessed Clinton’s server was
added, and at one point referenced Clinton’s use of her private email for an exchange with then President Obama while in the territory of a foreign adversary."
Unbelievable....
 
The Big Dog said:
"A paragraph summarizing the factors that led
the FBI to assess that it was possible that
hostile actors accessed Clinton’s server was
added, and at one point referenced Clinton’s use of her private email for an exchange with then President Obama while in the territory of a foreign adversary."
Unbelievable....
Click to expand...

Why is that worse than using the government non classified server for that communication?
 
logger said:
I could have used this one too.
Click to expand...

Again, whatever point you're trying to make fails because you're not responding to what I said.

I never said it was about politics. Whatever you read got into your brain, tumbled around in the critical thinking void, and came back out completely wrong.


Originally Posted by NoahFence View Post
Yes, actually I am. Because they are run of the mill voters. Do you suspect they get more than one vote or something? Are you under the impression that nobody at the FBI is allowed a preference?
Click to expand...


Ironic that you’d be the one to say it was about politics.
Click to expand...

Your reply MAKES NO SENSE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom