Oh, I almost forgot to address your BS claim about the money order...
Why would there need to be actual bank stamps on a money order when the issuing bank uses Hollerith tabulating machine?
[qimg]https://www.dropbox.com/s/xx820z8ap6knjfq/LHO%20Money%20Order.jpg?raw=1[/qimg]
See those holes in the paper; I have encircled them in red so that you can see them more clearly? They are punch holes made by bank keypunch machine. Back in the 1960's, when a money order or cheque is processed by whoever clears it (a bank for example) its run in a batch with hundreds or even thousands of others (depending on the size of the bank); each batch was handled by a keypunch machine operator.
A Hollerith tabulation machine reads those punch marks in whatever is being processed, in this case, a money order. This was typical at most banks in the USA, the vast majority of which used IBM 407s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_407
[qimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Ibm407_tabulator_1961_01.redstone.jpg/420px-Ibm407_tabulator_1961_01.redstone.jpg[/qimg]
A 1961 IBM407 Tabulator that use "Hollerith Code"
ETA: also note along the bottom of the front of the card the words "Do not fold, staple, spindle, or mutilate". This is written there because, beginning in the 1950's when punched cards became widespread, manufacturers printed a warning on cards that would be individually handled (like money orders). The reason for this is that doing any of those things would likely render the card unreadable by the tabulation machine. This is proof that the money order would have been expected to be machine read, not hand stamped.
Finally, the number along the top "138 4159796" was a US Treasury Dept locator code, it was printed on the money order by the bank at the time the money order is paid out.