• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
manifesto said:
He did not plan the execution of the assassination, but he was in on it and played a critical role in the cover up. The plotters knew he would be the most powerful man in USA (and the world) the very second JFK died. He used that power.
Click to expand...

No. This is mid-1960's hippie stuff.


Did he/they? Show me the evidence.
Click to expand...

I'm not posting links for you any more. You ignore them.

He knew that his time as the ”SOG” of the FBI was over the very second JFK was reelected. He hated RFK who was the first Attorney General who told him what to do. On a daily basis. He was a fanatical racist resenting JFK’s agenda of eradicating Jim Crow and provide equal opportunity to all Americans no matter the color of their skin. He resented RFK’s drive against Organized Crime, a non entity according to Hoover all the years up to the late 50ies when the Appalachian bust forced him to at least admit to its existence. He was best buddy an long time neighbor with LBJ helping him blackmailing his way to the vice precidency.
Click to expand...

All of that is hearsay. None of it is supported by the documented facts of the case.

He was litterally at ”the farm” the whole weekend of the assassination of JFK. He was still very much the godfather of the old boys network, meeting most of them at least on a weekly basis. Needles to say, he too hated JFK for getting fired after the Bay of Pigs, ending a brilliant career in disgrace.
Click to expand...

He resigned at JFK's request. He was a veteran officer, and understood that after the Bay of Pigs that he and Bissell had to go. The fact is that he could and should have canceled the invasion, as JFK should have. They both knew they'd failed.

That is an old canard from the lying mouth of LBJ. As soon it became known that LBJ was setting up a white washing truth commission, Dulles was hanging at the doorstep lobbying for being accepted as one of its members. I’ll bet he really wanted to find JFK’s assassins ... and thank them.
Click to expand...

No, this is something that all of RFK's biographers have confirmed. Dulles wanted nothing to do with the commission.
 
manifesto said:
He did not plan the execution of the assassination, but he was in on it and played a critical role in the cover up. The plotters knew he would be the most powerful man in USA (and the world) the very second JFK died. He used that power.

Did he/they? Show me the evidence.

He knew that his time as the ”SOG” of the FBI was over the very second JFK was reelected. He hated RFK who was the first Attorney General who told him what to do. On a daily basis. He was a fanatical racist resenting JFK’s agenda of eradicating Jim Crow and provide equal opportunity to all Americans no matter the color of their skin. He resented RFK’s drive against Organized Crime, a non entity according to Hoover all the years up to the late 50ies when the Appalachian bust forced him to at least admit to its existence. He was best buddy an long time neighbor with LBJ helping him blackmailing his way to the vice precidency.

He was litterally at ”the farm” the whole weekend of the assassination of JFK. He was still very much the godfather of the old boys network, meeting most of them at least on a weekly basis. Needles to say, he too hated JFK for getting fired after the Bay of Pigs, ending a brilliant career in disgrace.

That is an old canard from the lying mouth of LBJ. As soon it became known that LBJ was setting up a white washing truth commission, Dulles was hanging at the doorstep lobbying for being accepted as one of its members. I’ll bet he really wanted to find JFK’s assassins ... and thank them.
Click to expand...


Do you ever grow tired of making up stuff out of whole cloth?
 
Wolrab said:
That is why two CTers rarely post at the same time. Their game is too obvious. Neither believe their own blathering.
Click to expand...

And the reason they run like rabbits from giving a comprehensive hypothesis for how the assassination occurred. Just give them enough rope....
 
MicahJava said:
tomtomkent, nobody denies the official x-rays and photographs show that some of the forward half of the scalp and skull was part of the large defect. So what are you even talking about?

NSFW, autopsy photos: https://imgur.com/a/ADjaOpv

Reminder: the official government HSCA theory is that the entry was in the parietal bone, not the occipital bone like the autopsy doctors always said.
Click to expand...

What am I talking about?
The cuts made to the skull that show how the brain was removed, as I thought was made clear in the lengthy post you quoted, discussing the cuts made to the skull, to remove the brain.

Why you think that denies anything about the X-rays is confusing.
 
smartcooky said:
Do you ever grow tired of making up stuff out of whole cloth?
Click to expand...
Do you ever grow tired to handwave away information not to your liking? If there are anything in my post you take issue with, quote it and tell me what you find in error.

But, be specific.
 
Last edited:
manifesto said:
Do you ever grow tired to handwave away information not to your liking? If there are anything in my post you take issue with, quote it and tell me what you find in error.

But, be specific.
Click to expand...

This is rather like the pot calling the kettle black! Perhaps you should man up to accepting you don't know answers to questions posted, and stop handwaving scientific evidence that doesn't support your theories.;)
 
HSienzant said:
That was already done immediately above the post you're quibbling over:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12313067&postcount=4122

You just pretend like it wasn't.

Hank
Click to expand...

Hmmmm watching all this I'm starting to get the impression he not really that interested in the subject and his real objective is to draw posters into a useless non discussion where he can throw barbs at them. There's a name for that but it escapes me at the moment.......
 
Hans said:
Hmmmm watching all this I'm starting to get the impression he not really that interested in the subject and his real objective is to draw posters into a useless non discussion where he can throw barbs at them. There's a name for that but it escapes me at the moment.......
Click to expand...
Why are you get this impression? Could you be a little bit more specific, or are you just eager to show your ’pals’ that you are loyal no matter what?
 
Last edited:
bknight said:
This is rather like the pot calling the kettle black! Perhaps you should man up to accepting you don't know answers to questions posted, and stop handwaving scientific evidence that doesn't support your theories.;)
Click to expand...
What questions? Name them. Be specific.
 
RoboTimbo said:
Tell MicahJava, he disagrees with you ;).



Which of you is correct?
Click to expand...
I’m not sure on exactly what you are trying to convey, here. Blabber as usual. But I can say this. There is no thought police among critics of the official explanatications of the assassination of JFK. That would be like an oxymoron.

The opposite is true of those who adhere to the official proclamations. To state that this adherance is tightly guided by thought police is like a big fat bolded truism, if there ever was one.

Lets see a couple of your crazy blue little idiot smileys now, confirming my statements.

Do it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom