Agreed - but if she's lying about it today, and her job demands honesty - which her job does, then that's a problem.
Her job doesn't demand honesty, though. You'd think it should, and we like to pretend it does, but that's simply not the way it is.
Her job doesn't demand honesty, though. You'd think it should, and we like to pretend it does, but that's simply not the way it is.
Yeah, they do, but it wasn't the 90s that made you a fundamentalist YEC any more than it was the 80s and 90s that made me believe in various paranormal ********.
It's just another liberal hypocrite callout thread. Conservatives here are very found of them.
What puzzles me particularly, is that she earlier owned up to and apologized for blog posts she wrote in 2007-2009. The blog posts uncovered this time are even older - 2005 and before. So, I don't see the problem in owning up to those as well.Agreed - but if she's lying about it today, and her job demands honesty - which her job does, then that's a problem.
Which is why I'm wondering why bother lying about it, since that's a much larger issue. I pointed out before that angry Bernie stans and right-wing lunatics have been after her for a long time now, and she knows it, so why hand them anything?
If I had to guess, I'd say that she either figures she had her chance or she was told that she had her chance and that any further such nonsense could finish her. Everyone involved may just be biding their time, hoping for a graceful way to give her the boot.What puzzles me particularly, is that she earlier owned up to and apologized for blog posts she wrote in 2007-2009. The blog posts uncovered this time are even older - 2005 and before. So, I don't see the problem in owning up to those as well.
If I had to guess, I'd say that she either figures she had her chance or she was told that she had her chance and that any further such nonsense could finish her. Everyone involved may just be biding their time, hoping for a graceful way to give her the boot.
I'm pretty sure the journalist's job doesn't actually demand more honesty on LGBT issues than on any other issues.As far as LGBT issues go, I'm going to disagree.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa.../wp/2018/04/30/we-must-rally-around-joy-reid/
"Somewhere out there is a hacker — or perhaps an entire collective — specializing in retroactive-digital-homophobia-archival-insertion intrusions. This time they victimized Joy Reid. But tomorrow they could go after anyone in the industry. They’ll memorize old blogging archives; they’ll study fonts and writing styles; they’ll turn back the web’s clock a decade, then push it forward, then drop some inflammatory text on some platform. They’ll make everyone think that their targets are way more homophobic than they ever were, regardless of their ability to “evolve” on gay rights."
Good thing her name wasn't Roseanne.