All black, like an intact skull with no grapefruit sized exit wound.
What do you see over Kennedy's right ear? Is it all black with no detail? No, it's a massive blowout.
I see that the back of the head is intact. It's intact in the Zapruder film,
I see nothing at all. It’s pitch black. Shadow or painted on?
You decide:
https://youtu.be/AVaGYxuPQg8
the Nix film, the Muchmore film and the Moorman Polaroid.
Do you see the right back of the head in any detail in these films?
It's intact in the autopsy photos too, with the exact same blowout over the right ear clearly visible.
It is easy to either fake the photo or fix the body/head before taking the photo. Pulling down the scalp over the wound is one way to do it and they worked hard to ’restore’ JFK making him presentable for an eventual lit de parade (not decided upon) before burial.
As was pointed out to you earlier, your entire argument rests on things you CAN'T see.
You CAN'T SEE a rear exit wound in any of the extant photos or films...but you're sure it's there.
Yes, because ALL OTHER EVIDENCE says it’s there.
You CAN'T SEE any ejecta coming out of the back of the head...but you're sure it's there.
The speed of forward ejecta is four times the speed of back spatter. The light conditions behind the president is different than from above and from in front. And, that black patch seem suspiciously .... artifical.
None of the witnesses in Dealey Plaza actually saw a gunman anywhere but the depository...but you're sure there was one.
Wrong. At least three people saw a man shooting at the motorcade with a rifle from behind the picket fence.
As many as those who saw a man shooting with a rifle from the TSBD.
You CAN'T SEE McLain anywhere near where he needs to be to make the dictabelt recording work...but you're sure he's there.
Wrong. You need to prove he could NOT have been at the right places at the right time.
The scientific acoustic evidence stands on its own legs and do not need additional evidence to be valid. Only evidence proving the acoustic science wrong can change that.
It must be frustrating as hell to keep arguing things that you can't actually show anyone. It would drive me nuts.
Yes, it’s frustrating that no one pointed their camera at any of the five spots where an open mike picked up the sound from five rifle shots, but only for psychological reasons. The acoustic evidence is far stronger than photographic ditto because the latter can easily be faked. The acoustic evidence is impossible to fake.
Either there are five rifle shots recorded or, there are five diabolical coincidences worthy of a listing in Guinnies Book of World Records.
So, I invite you to shake this stigma. I've presented you with 4 different image sources shot as the assassination was happening. All of them show the back of Kennedy's head. Show me a single frame that shows anything but a full head of dark hair.
You and your brothers in faith are the ones sharing a stigma. History and truth are relentless forces of nature.
Sooner or later, truth will prevail.
