Your vivid imagination is getting the better of you.
What characteristics does your shapeless blob have that identify it as HB McLain over and above what I've provided for the subject in the Dorman film?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge
- Thread starter BStrong
- Start date
- Status
Your vivid imagination is getting the better of you.
What characteristics does your shapeless blob have that identify it as HB McLain over and above what I've provided for the subject in the Dorman film?
One alleged evidence at the time, yes. What is inherently inapropriate with this?
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
So you're outright rejecting consilience?
Here they are, photographed from all angles in high resolution with ingravings pointed out by NARA. Let me know if you find ”DAY” ingraved on any of them:
http://www.krusch.com/jfk/Shells_National_Archives.zip
If ”consilience” (lol) is built on none and/or fabricated evidence, of course I do.
Shouldn’t I?
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
You don't have a clue what it means, do you?
HSienzant
Philosopher
AS PREDICTED.
The very obvious shifting of the burden of proof.
It's your claim they are not there. Prove it. It's not up to anyone else to disprove your claim.
Hank
I detailed a lot of reasons to conclude that the faceless blob has to be an MC-helmet on the head of, by process of elimination, McLain.
Why are you not commenting on those listed reasons?
Why are you avoiding the rest of my post?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12268051&postcount=1678
If NARA doesn’t find them, who would? Electron microscope?
Yes, I think the realm of myths was entered long ago.
So process of elimination works for your shapeless blob that no one else can see, but NOT for the motorcycle officer at Dorman frame 456 travelling in the exact same spot in the motorcade as McLain, at a similar speed as McLain, with the same white notepad clipped to his windshield as McLain?
What makes "process of elimination" valid for your blob, but not the Dorman figure?
So far it means, ’an excuse for not looking at the evidence’.
Do you have other definitions?
First. Do you agree that the ”blob” have to be a white MC-helmet?
Good. Then it’s due time for the truth, wouldn’t you say?
What are you so afraid of? Revolution?
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Since you know so little about every subject that's been brought up in this thread, don't you agree that you should go learn before embarrassing yourself further? I see it's been suggested many times already.
You really have no clue what it means, do you?
No, I don't.
Prove to me that it is a motorcycle cop helmet and not just static on the film, or the sun reflecting off of one of the heads of the couple dozen people sitting on the sides of vehicles in the motorcade ahead of HB McLain.
https://i2.wp.com/jfkrunningthegaun...es-houston-street-motocade.jpg?resize=600,460
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
HSienzant
Philosopher
You're funny.
It's your claim J.C.Day's initials are not there, and you're now trusting a branch of the Federal Government not to lie to you, after claiming:
NARA is part of US "officaldom" [sic].
I think you need to make up your mind whether NARA and "US officaldom" [sic] is trustworthy or not. If you're going to trust NARA, why not the Warren Commission?
And you still need to prove J.C.Day's initials are not on the shells (which is the claim you made and I asked you to prove), instead of shifting the burden of proof and asking us to establish they are.
You made the claim. You can prove it, can't you? You don't have to take the word of a branch of the federal government for it, do you?
Hank
PS: Again, if you had read the thread, you'd know exactly where this would end up. You're playing the standard CT hand, and we can all see your cards.
Last edited:
LSSBB
Devilish Dictionarian
What is your hypothesis, and what is the network of information from different disciplines to support your hypothesis?
Merriam-Webster said:
Some single anomaly of a particular principle does not invalidate consilience. A network of anomalies tied together in a comprehensive manner may cause theory to require adjustment, however I have yet to see you present such a comprehensive network across different disciplines. For example, do you have a set of prints, eyewitness testimony, a weapon, and a purchase history for that weapon?
They are hardly moving, packed together queuing up to the intersection. The ”blob” is moving at a considerable speed, and its shiny white, and, its ONE blob, not half a dozen.
You can do better than this.
- Status