Squeegee Beckenheim
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 32,124
She's a woman working under the Trump administration... shouldn't she know what her role is and how females are supposed to be treated?
This is what I'm increasingly leaning toward to explain why the GOP continues to rally around Trump. They should be in full scale damage control mode, not circling the wagons around some loser who is already the worst president in history.it's looking more and more like the RNC is in hot water itself.
Its possible that the GOP is rallying around Trump because their shared history of corrupt activities.This is what I'm increasingly leaning toward to explain why the GOP continues to rally around Trump. They should be in full scale damage control mode, not circling the wagons around some loser who is already the worst president in history.
But if Trump tapped into a vein of deep corruption within the GOP itself, which his downfall would bring to light...
This is what I'm increasingly leaning toward to explain why the GOP continues to rally around Trump. They should be in full scale damage control mode, not circling the wagons around some loser who is already the worst president in history.
But if Trump tapped into a vein of deep corruption within the GOP itself, which his downfall would bring to light...
Its possible that the GOP is rallying around Trump because their shared history of corrupt activities.
But, its also possible that its just political survival. Yes, Trump might be the iceberg that sunk the S.S. Titanic (driving off moderates and independents for the upcoming mid-terms and the 2020 election, and making minorities less likely to support the party in the future.) But the alternative is just as damaging. Trump has a firm control over the bigots in the republican party (which, it appears, seems to be pretty much everyone now.) Go against Trump and not only will you not get the moderates back, but you also risk losing what little voter base you have. So the choice is either: Support Trump and risk a humiliating defeat, or go against trump and get absolutely slaughtered.
Can't say I have any sympathy for them at this point.
Its possible that the GOP is rallying around Trump because their shared history of corrupt activities.
But, its also possible that its just political survival. Yes, Trump might be the iceberg that sunk the S.S. Titanic (driving off moderates and independents for the upcoming mid-terms and the 2020 election, and making minorities less likely to support the party in the future.) But the alternative is just as damaging. Trump has a firm control over the bigots in the republican party (which, it appears, seems to be pretty much everyone now.) Go against Trump and not only will you not get the moderates back, but you also risk losing what little voter base you have. So the choice is either: Support Trump and risk a humiliating defeat, or go against trump and get absolutely slaughtered.
Can't say I have any sympathy for them at this point.
Lol
Might it be possible that the GOP rallies around Trump because he’s been superb in passing and pushing policies of the GOP?
Yeah like the way he got health care reform passed.Lol
Might it be possible that the GOP rallies around Trump because he’s been superb in passing and pushing policies of the GOP?
Lol
Might it be possible that the GOP rallies around Trump because he’s been superb in passing and pushing policies of the GOP?
She's a woman working under the Trump administration... shouldn't she know what her role is and how females are supposed to be treated?
Err... it looks like you’re agreeing? You said he should be able to get some passed, so they aren’t rallying around him to cover for some sinister conspiracy?You're kidding right?
There is a Republican House, a Republican Senate a conservative Supreme Court and he's also a Republican President. He damn well should be able to get some Republican priorities passed. Yet, he failed on Obamacare, has failed on infrastructure, The White House hasn't sponsored and passed a single bill. Sure the President has signed a few bills that has made it to his desk, but any Republican should be able to do that.
The wall has gone NOWHERE. He's implemented tariffs which most Republicans oppose. If Trump had any capabilities it should be with Infrastructure. Something as a builder, you would think he would understand and support. It's also an area which pretty much EVERYONE knows is a need. But it's been zilch.
Yeah like the way he got health care reform passed.
No, wait a minute.
Actually Trump has very few "victories" as president. Only one major piece of legislation (tax reform), and Trump had very little input in that. And he did get an anti-abortion justice appointed to the supreme court, but again, most of the work there was done by republican senators obstructing Obama. Lots of executive orders passed, but then any republican could have done the same.
Plus, as others have pointed out, some of his policies (e.g. anti-free trade) have actually been in opposition to traditional conservative policies.
Meanwhile, Trump's toxicity and habit of alienating moderates, minorities, and non-racists will probably mean that the GOP won't have any more success in getting their policies passed in the future.
Re: UN Ambassador Haley[b/]...
She isn't invited to the White House Bible study group.She's a woman working under the Trump administration... shouldn't she know what her role is and how females are supposed to be treated?
Sky News said:Russia has revealed it warned the US about "red lines" it should not cross before it launched airstrikes on Syria.
Foreign minister Sergei Lavrov is reported to have said that officials in Washington were contacted before last weekend's strikes by the US, UK and France.
Mr Lavrov said: "There were military leadership contacts, between generals, between our representatives and the coalition leadership.
"They were informed about where our red lines are, including red lines on the ground, geographically. And the results show that they did not cross these red lines."
House Intelligence Committee report clears Trump of collusion
The 253-page report found no evidence of collusion, but did cite “poor judgment” and “ill-considered actions” on part of the Trump team and Hillary Clinton's campaign.
“While the committee found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded, coordinated, or conspired with the Russian government, the investigation did find poor judgment and ill-considered actions by the Trump and Clinton campaigns,” the report concluded.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...port-clears-trump-collusion-article-1.3958545 (April 27, 2018)