• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
manifesto said:
JFK to Nehru, January, 1962:
”I grew up in a community where the people were hardly a generation away from colonial rule. And I can claim the company of many historians in saying that the colonialism to which my immediate ancestors were subject was more sterile, oppressive and even cruel than that of India.”​
https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/dodd-and-dulles-vs-kennedy-in-africa
Click to expand...

So JFK was going to kill Greer, but Greer got to him first?

Hank
 
RoboTimbo said:
You should discuss a topic that you know something - anything - about. This subject is not that subject.
Click to expand...
I know a lot of a lot of efforts do ”debunk” HSCA’s acoustical investigations. I know of none that has actually succeded in doing that.

I presume you do?

Show me.
 
HSienzant said:
So JFK was going to kill Greer, but Greer got to him first?

Hank
Click to expand...

This is the flaw that he seems to be avoiding. Kennedy has ample encounters with his apparent, mortal Protestant enemies, and Honey Fitz Kennedy spends several years in London, the heart of that brutal colonialism.... and yet fails to show any inclination for bloody retribution.
So why should Greer be assumed to be murderously inclined on such flimsy grounds?
 
bknight said:
I posted links earlier go find them and figure out why the analysis of the 70's was not accurate enough in the 2000's. Technology moved on why haven't you considering the acoustical claim of four gunshots?

ETA: Go find the links I provided, or do you not want to be enlightened?
Click to expand...
A ”link” doesen’t cut it. Explain what are behind the link and more precisly how it refutes HSCA’s acoustical findings.

Defend your source.
 
manifesto said:
I believe you have finally lost it, Hank. I feel sorry for you. Defending a lost cause all this years and sensing the end is near.

Easy to go bonkers for less than that.
Click to expand...

Have your forgotten your arguments for "innocent until proven guilty" or do they not apply when you wish to reduce Greer to a racist stereotype and accuse him?
 
Tomtomkent said:
Have your forgotten your arguments for "innocent until proven guilty" or do they not apply when you wish to reduce Greer to a racist stereotype and accuse him?
Click to expand...
I do not reduce him to a racist stereotype, I’m quoting his SON insinuating that he did not like JFK for ethnic reasons.

You knew Greer better than his own son?
 
manifesto said:
I do not reduce him to a racist stereotype, I’m quoting his SON insinuating that he did not like JFK for ethnic reasons.

You knew Greer better than his own son?
Click to expand...

"Not liking" is not evidence of the part you are claiming he played, or grounds for reasonable suspicion.
 
manifesto said:
That said, Hank, do you have any evidence supporting your bald claim that Oswald killed JFK?
Click to expand...
Did you think someone else killed him?

You alluded to a certain papertrail showing that Oswald bought the alleged murder weapon. Correct?

What paper trail?

Show me.
Click to expand...
Maybe you should go learn some things before trying to discuss what you are obviously mentally unprepared to discuss. You don't seem to know anything about the assassination.
 
Tomtomkent said:
This is the flaw that he seems to be avoiding. Kennedy has ample encounters with his apparent, mortal Protestant enemies, and Honey Fitz Kennedy spends several years in London, the heart of that brutal colonialism.... and yet fails to show any inclination for bloody retribution.
So why should Greer be assumed to be murderously inclined on such flimsy grounds?
Click to expand...
1. It is Greers actions during and after the assassination that is more than suspicious.

2. I provide a more than plausible motive for those actions.

You be the judge.
 
RoboTimbo said:
Did you think someone else killed him?


Maybe you should go learn some things before trying to discuss what you are obviously mentally unprepared to discuss. You don't seem to know anything about the assassination.
Click to expand...
It’s really easy. If you make a claim. Show me the evidence.

You are consistently trying to promote that I should find the evidence myself. To support YOUR claim.

Do you really not understand the madness in that charge?

Edited by jsfisher: 
...SNIP... Edited for compliance with Rules 0 and 12 of the Membership Agreement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
manifesto said:
It’s really easy. If you make a claim. Show me the evidence.

You are consistently trying to promote that I should find the evidence myself. To support YOUR claim.

Do you really not understand the madness in that charge?

Or are you just trolling as usual, RoboTimbo?
Click to expand...

Are you claiming that someone else killed JFK? Support your claim. It will need to be compelling evidence to overcome the null hypothesis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom