• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Nautilus case

Professor i psykologi om Peter Madsens sind: ’Det er det skrappeste jeg har set’ (B.T., Mar. 9, 2018)
Psychology professor about Peter Madsen’s mind: ’It’s the worst I’ve seen’

Med sit kendskab til Nautilus UC3 køber Jens Falkenberg ikke historien.
»Jeg tror ikke, at Peter fortæller sandheden,« siger 58-årige Falkenberg. Da han er indkaldt som vidne i retssagen, vil han endnu ikke gå i detaljer med, hvorfor Madsens forklaring ikke kan passe.
Peter Madsens advokat Betina Hald Engmark har ingen kommentarer til Jens Falkenbergs udsagn.
Peter Madsens ven og ubådsbygger: Jeg tror ikke på den her kuliltehistorie (B.T., Mar. 9, 2018)
Click to expand...

”With his knowledge of the Nautilus UC3 Jens Falkenberg doesn’t believe in the story (about carbonmonoxide poisoning).
“I don’t think that Peter is telling the truth,” says Falkenberg, 58. Since he is summoned as a witness in the trial, he won’t go into details about why Madsen’s explanation can’t be true.
Peter Madsen’s lawyer Betina Hald Engmark has no comments to Jens Falkenberg’s statement.”

Fotograf om billedet af Peter Madsen der afslørede blod i ansigtet: Jeg anede det ikke (B.T., Mar. 9, 2018)
Photographer about the photo of Peter Madsen that revealed blood on his face: I had no idea
 
According to the coroner, the stab wounds in the genital area of the deceased are not consistent with Peter Madsen's explanation that they were inflicted 6-7 hours after she died. Some of them seem to have happened immediately before or after the time of death.
I don't know why carbon-monoxide poisoning as a possible cause of death wasn't mentioned at all.
Retsmediciner sår tvivl om Madsens forklaring (Ekstra Bladet, Mar. 22, 2018)
 
dann said:
Really disgusting stuff (BT, Mar. 23, 2018)
Click to expand...

Indeed. No doubt about it.

What does the last sentence mean?
I'm taking it through Google translate.

Does it mean he decided to dismember the dead body afterwards (in a state of shock), or that he decided to mate (make love? this is what Google Translate gives me) with the dead body afterwards?
 
Yes, dismember! That's an awful translation.
"partere" = dissect
 
dann said:
Yes, dismember! That's an awful translation.
"partere" = dissect
Click to expand...

I suspected as well.

But in this case, the outrageous translation could belong to the possibilities of what has happened on that sub. So I had to ask.

Thanks for clearing this up.
 
Peter Madsen may be a serial killer after all.
He gave an interview in the afternoon of Aug. 10, 2017.

- In the interview he started talking about needing to learn to shut up about things because he found it difficult to keep certain things to himself, the witness says.
- Then he used the analongy that he was the main suspect of the homicide of his wife’s neighbour. He started to talk about having the right to remain silent, she continues.
https://www.msn.com/da-dk/nyheder/k...drabsmand-inden-sejltur/ar-BBKIl5A?li=BBr5MK0 (msn.com, Mar. 26, 2018)
Click to expand...
 
One thing that can be concluded following today's hearing: Peter Madsen enjoyed watching execution videos - including authentic ones.

It got to the point, where the law judge first asked for a break, then later following up by asking the prosecutor to sort in the videos so they wouldn't have to watch so many of them. The prosecutor replied that they had already been sorted, and that he was only showing the ones necessary to prove his case.
 
While I have followed this thread since the beginning, and read the links, I may have still missed the answer to something I'm curious about.

Is much known about his his history, the family dynamics in which he was raised, any family health issues, prior relationships with people and those types of background information?

This is an interesting case. Complex and full of questions waiting to have answers. Compelling and horrific.
 
wasapi said:
While I have followed this thread since the beginning, and read the links, I may have still missed the answer to something I'm curious about.

Is much known about his his history, the family dynamics in which he was raised, any family health issues, prior relationships with people and those types of background information?

This is an interesting case. Complex and full of questions waiting to have answers. Compelling and horrific.
Click to expand...

This is a court case, no a psychiatric case. Once we find out what he has done and taken the necessary precautions according to that, then it might be figured out why he did it, and whether something can be done bout it.

Hans
 
KDLarsen said:
One thing that can be concluded following today's hearing: Peter Madsen enjoyed watching execution videos - including authentic ones.

It got to the point, where the law judge first asked for a break, then later following up by asking the prosecutor to sort in the videos so they wouldn't have to watch so many of them. The prosecutor replied that they had already been sorted, and that he was only showing the ones necessary to prove his case.
Click to expand...

Apparently the public is not allowed to view this evidence... outrageous! Witnesses that cannot be named and witness cross-examination behind closed doors... this clearly a farce!
 
Last edited:
See, this one scares the **** out of me.

That guy Madsen has to be completely crazy. How did he think for a moment that he could get away with this act? The boyfriend knew where Wall was going. He expected her back in 2 hours. There was absolutely no way she could "disappear" during that time without Madsen being implicated. No conceivable scenario whatsoever. Had I been in her shoes, I would have probably felt safe for that reason alone. "Well, this guy's leering at me a bit, but he can't hurt me. Everyone would know it was him in a second."

Apparently that doesn't matter when a disturbed person's urges get the better of him. Academically, I guess I knew that - but seeing it played out in this case twists my guts into knots. I wish I never had to leave my house again when I read about things like this. It's just so awful.

I wonder if Madsen would have hurt the boyfriend too, had he come along, or if such "crimes of passion" are only conceivable for him when the physical odds are completely unmatched. I suspect the latter. What a sick, crazy coward.

I can't believe I used to hitchhike all the time when I was younger and wilder. I must have been high. Yeah, I know, most people are good and wouldn't harm me. But all you have to do is run into that ONE bad apple, like poor Wall did. Had I been equally unfortunate, I would have effectively gift-wrapped myself for said monster. I'm worse than useless in any physical altercation, unless I suppose, my assailant is a small child. With hemophilia.
 
Last edited:
isissxn said:
See, this one scares the **** out of me.

That guy Madsen has to be completely crazy. How did he think for a moment that he could get away with this act? The boyfriend knew where Wall was going. He expected her back in 2 hours. There was absolutely no way she could "disappear" during that time without Madsen being implicated. No conceivable scenario whatsoever. Had I been in her shoes, I would have probably felt safe for that reason alone. "Well, this guy's leering at me a bit, but he can't hurt me. Everyone would know it was him in a second." altercation, unless I suppose, my assailant is a small child. With hemophilia.
Click to expand...

And even if we take his explanation at face value, he's bat crazy: I mean ... you are in territorial waters, max twenty minutes from the nearest port. You passenger dies from an accident and .... you cut her up and throw the body parts in the sea with weights tied to them ... :boggled::eye-poppi

....

Hans :boxedin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom