• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

Darat

Lackey
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
129,878
Location
South East, UK
This is a continuation of Part 2. The split was arbitrary, and you may freely quote from the old thread here.
Posted By: KMortis


Is it acting as if it is magnetic, it seems to be incredible light whatever it is and if that was magnetic I'd expect it to be very quickly pulled onto the magnet not waving about unaligned with the magnetic field?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, that's obviously the source of the material or, perhaps, something that reacts with something in the atmosphere to create the material when vaporised. What I'm asking is what is it composed of, what does it react with, and what is the resultant substance.



This page lists tungsten reactions, and the only two which seem to apply are the creation of tungsten trioxide, which doesn't look similar (not least because it's a pretty green colour), and tungsten hexafluride, which is a colourless gas.

So, unless there's a chemist who can point out something I'm missing, or unless there are reactions that haven't been mentioned on that page, then it doesn't seem to be a reaction of tungsten.
Also the proper reaction to anything that releases WF6 is to leave the area immediately; it's really nasty stuff.
 
In one of Mills's earlier experiments he managed to "vaporize" one of the electrodes and deposit approximately the same volume of material on the other electrode. I speculated at the time that a less controlled version of cathodic arc vaporization and deposition was going on.

Along the same lines, I speculate that the filaments are metallic, and formed from vaporized electrode material condensing along the path of the arc (when the arc itself is interrupted).

Mills is fooling around with high-powered (low voltage high current) arcs in nontypical and non-useful (in terms of known applications) ways. It would be ironic but not totally astounding if he accidentally comes up with some actually useful new product or process along the way.
 
Interesting and perhaps a warning for Mills.

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-41

He doesn't sell shares just takes and wastes investor's money on unproven claims. If he would be foolish enough to sell shares he would then come under SEC rules. As far as I know private company's can waste money as long as people are dense enough to give it to him and he has them sign a sheet that he is working on 'unproven technology that may not return a profit' or similar weasel words.
 
This is a continuation of Part 2. The split was arbitrary, and you may freely quote from the old thread here.
Posted By: KMortis


Is it acting as if it is magnetic, it seems to be incredible light whatever it is and if that was magnetic I'd expect it to be very quickly pulled onto the magnet not waving about unaligned with the magnetic field?

It would be paramagnetic, not diamagnetic (ferromagnetic). So the magnetism is derived from another magnetic field and is much weaker.

Knowing Mills, he would have calculated the paramagnetic force of the substance, as he does dozens of times throughout his book. (He uses diamagnetic, paramagnetic and electrical forces to calculate, say, atomic and molecular sizes.)

Aside from spider webs, the 'substance' reminds me of times when we would precipitate DNA out of an alcohol solution. In the solution the DNA was white, fine, long and stringy.

If I was to guess I would say the substance is polymeric hydrino hydride. The metal would have to be very light, like Beryllium. (I don't recall that Beryllium in any of it's valence states acts as a hydrino formation catalyst, so it probably isn't Beryllium itself. )

We'll soon find out when he publishes a paper on it. The good news is that now he can create hydrino hydride compounds very quickly rather than having it take weeks, per the era when he created the hydrino hydride crystals c2000.
 
It would be paramagnetic, not diamagnetic (ferromagnetic). So the magnetism is derived from another magnetic field and is much weaker.

Knowing Mills, he would have calculated the paramagnetic force of the substance, as he does dozens of times throughout his book. (He uses diamagnetic, paramagnetic and electrical forces to calculate, say, atomic and molecular sizes.)

Aside from spider webs, the 'substance' reminds me of times when we would precipitate DNA out of an alcohol solution. In the solution the DNA was white, fine, long and stringy.

If I was to guess I would say the substance is polymeric hydrino hydride. The metal would have to be very light, like Beryllium. (I don't recall that Beryllium in any of it's valence states acts as a hydrino formation catalyst, so it probably isn't Beryllium itself. )

We'll soon find out when he publishes a paper on it. The good news is that now he can create hydrino hydride compounds very quickly rather than having it take weeks, per the era when he created the hydrino hydride crystals c2000.

The ones he promised to researchers and then never delivered.

Also when will he be providing his first sample with "anti-gravity" properties as he also promised back in the early days?
 
The ones he promised to researchers and then never delivered.

Also when will he be providing his first sample with "anti-gravity" properties as he also promised back in the early days?

Those crystal compounds were delivered to lots of labs, as described earlier in this thread.

Hydrino hydrides don't have antigravity properties. Rather, Mills proposes that a free electron can be so energized as to produce a hyperbolic space time curvature around it, which would counter the positive space time curvature of gravity.
 
Rather, Mills proposes that a free electron can be so energized as to produce a hyperbolic space time curvature around it, which would counter the positive space time curvature of gravity.

I don't know anything about particle physics but this sounds sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo trollish, in a Deepak Chopra style.
 
Those crystal compounds were delivered to lots of labs, as described earlier in this thread.

That is not true.


Hydrino hydrides don't have antigravity properties. Rather, Mills proposes that a free electron can be so energized as to produce a hyperbolic space time curvature around it, which would counter the positive space time curvature of gravity.

You'll excuse me by going with what he said rather than your retcon.
 
Those crystal compounds were delivered to lots of labs, as described earlier in this thread.

The above is not true at all, imo.

There is no independent evidence that any hydrino based crystals or compounds were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No hydrino crystals were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No hydrino compounds were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

Also imo:

No working hydrino based electricity or power generators of any type were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No working hydrino based devices will ever be produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No hydrino compounds of any type will ever be produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

There is absolutely no independent evidence of any of Mills' claims.
All reports and statements and claims trace back to entities connected to Mills.
 
That is not true.




You'll excuse me by going with what he said rather than your retcon.

You'll never be able to find anywhere where Mills has said his hydrino compounds have antigravity properties. You're only speaking from your confusion. Dihydrino gas, like hydrogen gas, will be buoyant in our atmosphere and go up, but that is not antigravity.

Meanwhile, look up chapter 35 in Mill's book and read all about the hyperbolic free electron with antigravity properties.
 
The above is not true at all, imo.

There is no independent evidence that any hydrino based crystals or compounds were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No hydrino crystals were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No hydrino compounds were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

Also imo:

No working hydrino based electricity or power generators of any type were ever produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No working hydrino based devices will ever be produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

No hydrino compounds of any type will ever be produced by Mills or by any entity working for or connected to Mills.

There is absolutely no independent evidence of any of Mills' claims.
All reports and statements and claims trace back to entities connected to Mills.


Good thing that your opinion does not reflect reality.
 
Good thing that your opinion does not reflect reality.
In this case it does. Because there's no evidence for any of Mills' claims as we've been over and over the past several years in this thread alone. Which includes in a roundabout way, the past thirty-ish years of all of Mills' claims, none of which have ever been produced as he himself has claimed time and time and time again.
 
You'll never be able to find anywhere where Mills has said his hydrino compounds have antigravity properties. You're only speaking from your confusion. Dihydrino gas, like hydrogen gas, will be buoyant in our atmosphere and go up, but that is not antigravity.

Meanwhile, look up chapter 35 in Mill's book and read all about the hyperbolic free electron with antigravity properties.

Interesting wording: "You'll never be able to find anywhere where Mills has said his hydrino compounds have antigravity properties."

Fair, enough - he did not use those *exact* words. It's telling that you then direct attention to the chapter where antigravity characteristics are described...

More:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/nuclear/loser-hot-or-not

https://www.villagevoice.com/1999/12/21/quantum-leap/
 
Good thing that your opinion does not reflect reality.

His opinion does and your doesn't. We've been over this many times in this thread.

He (Mills) has nothing but you pretend he does - that is your problem not ours.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom