• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
FYI: That "Figure 32.9" is in his deluded book and really does have the temperature of the universe as about 2.75 K at t = 0 :jaw-dropp!
Then he idiotically has the temperature decreasing as time passes and getting to 0 at ~6.2 x 1011 years.

The reality is that the temperature of the CMB is measured to increase from its current value of about 2.75 K with redshift so that at a redshift of 3 it is ~11 K.
Constraints on the CMB Temperature Evolution using Multi-Band Measurements of the Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect with the South Pole Telescope

Slight correction here, the temperature of the Universe increases with redshift - ie. the past. Both the generally accepted Big Bang theory and surprisingly Mills agree that the universe cools as it expands.
 
Slight correction here, the temperature of the Universe increases with redshift - ie. the past. Both the generally accepted Big Bang theory and surprisingly Mills agree that the universe cools as it expands.
You are right - I did not make it clear that the idiotic bit was the temperature getting to 0, i.e. absolute zero, which is impossible.

Mills curve is not the CMB temperature in an expanding universe which never gets to zero. The CMB temperature will halve every 8 billion years from now on.

Mills does an irrelevant calculation of the gravitational red shift of a photon.
 
I've been searching around to no avail to find a known chemical reaction that produces smoke, which then solidifies into fibrous material, but I'm happy to admit that my google-fu may be letting me down, and my chemical knowledge is slim. I would assume, if Mills is replicating it, that it can't be that obscure. Are there any chemists reading this thread who can offer any insight?
 
If you look closely at the first few frames you can see a thin filament between the two electrodes.

Yes, that's obviously the source of the material or, perhaps, something that reacts with something in the atmosphere to create the material when vaporised. What I'm asking is what is it composed of, what does it react with, and what is the resultant substance.

I'd bet that the silky stuff came from whatever happens when high voltage burns up tungsten.

This page lists tungsten reactions, and the only two which seem to apply are the creation of tungsten trioxide, which doesn't look similar (not least because it's a pretty green colour), and tungsten hexafluride, which is a colourless gas.

So, unless there's a chemist who can point out something I'm missing, or unless there are reactions that haven't been mentioned on that page, then it doesn't seem to be a reaction of tungsten.
 
Is it acting as if it is magnetic, it seems to be incredible light whatever it is and if that was magnetic I'd expect it to be very quickly pulled onto the magnet not waving about unaligned with the magnetic field?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom