• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Myriad

The Clarity Is Devastating
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
23,531
Location
Betwixt
This is a continuation of this thread.. As usual the split point is arbitrary an participants may freely quote from the previous iteration.
Posted By: Agatha



If I take a huge parabolic mirror or use a lens to concentrate incident solar radiation 1000 times on to the surface of a pv cell, the incident radiation per meter on the surface of that cell is no longer 1.4kW/m. So why are you arguing as if this is still the case? These cells are built to deal with megawatts of power per meter.


Oh dear, it appears michaelsude (and very possibly Mills too) is under the impression that a concentrator solar array is something like a solar panel that you can blast with already concentrated solar radiation (like, by sticking it in the middle of one of those multi-acre arrays of solar tracking mirrors) to convert lots of power without damage. Oops!

My question for Mills is: What kinds of control and actuator mechanisms are used to keep the streams of molten silver precisely aligned with one another when the cell is operating in a vehicle that can accelerate, brake, and turn? Please describe the development path and anticipated schedule of this subsystem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
with 1m2 that's also roughly a sphere of radius of 28 cm if fully closed. If it is only a dome like the Graphite dome, then it is a dome/half sphere : 2*pi*r2=1 => 40 cm of height and 80 cm diameter/40 cm radius. Not bad for a block motor.... Hope you don't need much palce for anything else.
I'm assuming both the graphite dome and the spherical PV array are full spheres.
 
If I take a huge parabolic mirror or use a lens to concentrate incident solar radiation 1000 times on to the surface of a pv cell, the incident radiation per meter on the surface of that cell is no longer 1.4kW/m. So why are you arguing as if this is still the case? These cells are built to deal with megawatts of power per meter.

But then the cells are spaced out at the centers of those large mirrors or lenses, with wide gaps between them for cooling. Mills wants to pack them together with no gaps between them. Where's the cooling?
 
But then the cells are spaced out at the centers of those large mirrors or lenses, with wide gaps between them for cooling. Mills wants to pack them together with no gaps between them. Where's the cooling?

The magical radiator that somehow manages to disperse the massive amount of heat without interfering with collecting light from the glowing dome.
 
BLPcars: We have a great new engine technology. It is going to revolutionize automotive travel. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: Great! When can I see it running?

BLPcars: Currently we are focused on developing new tire technology. You see our engine generates so much torque that conventional tires just cannot handle it. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: But I want to see the new engine perform. When can you show me that?

BLPcars: Right after we finish developing new headlights. Cars with our engine are going to travel so fast that you will need to see much further ahead on the road for safety. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: But what about the new engine?

BLPcars: We only have a few more things to accomplish first. You will need better seats because of all the time you are going to want to be driving. Once we have those ready we will be ready for our first attempt at starting up the new engine. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: What? You haven't even start it yet!

BLPcars: Although "conventional" engineering says our design will never work, we are extremely confident in our chief engineer. He has a doctorate in philosophy! Plus, we have verified that the engine actually turns when attached to a starter motor. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.
 
BLPcars: We have a great new engine technology. It is going to revolutionize automotive travel. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: Great! When can I see it running?

BLPcars: Currently we are focused on developing new tire technology. You see our engine generates so much torque that conventional tires just cannot handle it. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: But I want to see the new engine perform. When can you show me that?

BLPcars: Right after we finish developing new headlights. Cars with our engine are going to travel so fast that you will need to see much further ahead on the road for safety. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: But what about the new engine?

BLPcars: We only have a few more things to accomplish first. You will need better seats because of all the time you are going to want to be driving. Once we have those ready we will be ready for our first attempt at starting up the new engine. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

Customer: What? You haven't even start it yet!

BLPcars: Although "conventional" engineering says our design will never work, we are extremely confident in our chief engineer. He has a doctorate in philosophy! Plus, we have verified that the engine actually turns when attached to a starter motor. We just need a little more funding to bring it to market.

You forgot the peanut gallery of fans making fun of people who believe internal combustion engines work, claiming the new engine already works fine and that multiple scientists have independently proven the engine works.
 
Just putting these here so Michael can't miss them:

michaelsuede said:
If I take a huge parabolic mirror or use a lens to concentrate incident solar radiation 1000 times on to the surface of a pv cell, the incident radiation per meter on the surface of that cell is no longer 1.4kW/m. So why are you arguing as if this is still the case? These cells are built to deal with megawatts of power per meter.
I hope you never attempt to work in a lab in any building that I'm in. Of course if you concentrate the sun's 1.4kW/m2 with a 1000 sun array, then the peak power density on the silicon will be 1.4MW/m2, but the area illuminated will be 1000 times less than the total collection area of array, so that the mean power density will still be 1.4kW/m2. But in the idiotic application, the mean power density will have to be about 230kW/m2 (depending on its area) which means that the array will be absorbing 165 times more power per unit area than it is exposed to in its normal solar application. Passive cooling will not work. And what's worse the peak power density on the silicon will be 230MW/m2. Ouch!

Oh - and here's something else. Let's say the graphite dome is 25cm in diameter, so about 0.195m2 in surface area. Let's say it's heated to 3500K to avoid it sublimating away. The the Stefan-Boltzmann radiation formula gives a total radiated power of 1.7MW, all of which heat will have to be dissipated somehow. Because you're running the dome at a reddish temperature, the radiance will peak in the infrared and only about 14% of the power will be in the visible. The mean total radiance on the PV cells will be 1.7MW/m2, assuming an array with 1 m2 area (over 1,000 times the solar case). For a passively cooled system, assuming the cell array is itself radiating as a blackbody, the equilibrium temperature of the array would be about 2350K. That's not going to be good. For a 1000 sun system, you then have a peak power density on the silicon of 1.7GW/m2. Ouch, ouch, ouch!

If the reaction doesn't produce 1.7MW of power then a dome of that size will not get to 3500K.

You can reduce the power output by making the dome smaller, but then you have to engineer all the gubbins inside the dome, molten silver and all into a smaller dome. Or you can run the dome at a lower temperature where the PV cells are even less sensitive and you throw away even more heat.

The steam engine is looking ever so attractive.
 
Last edited:
I still feel your analogy is meaningless given we are talking about a dense receiver array that will be cooled using an active cooling solution. My point in bring up the passive abilities of the chips was simply to demonstrate they are capable of dealing with megawatt power levels without melting. Active cooling solutions, such as jet impingement/micro-channel cooling, are capable of dealing with the heat build up. I never said BrLP planned on using a passive cooling solution.

Just eye-balling it, the diameter of the dome is closer to 15 cm rather than 25. You can get a good look at it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omUSfYuVT1c

BrLP plans on running it at 3000K for the first build outs.
 
Last edited:
I still feel your analogy is meaningless given we are talking about a dense receiver array that will be cooled using an active cooling solution. My point in bring up the passive abilities of the chips was simply to demonstrate they are capable of dealing with megawatt power levels without melting. Active cooling solutions, such as jet impingement/micro-channel cooling, are capable of dealing with the heat build up. I never said BrLP planned on using a passive cooling solution.

Just eye-balling it, the diameter of the dome is closer to 15 cm rather than 25. You can get a good look at it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omUSfYuVT1c

Active cooling? So more moving parts in the no moving parts generator?
 
Active cooling? So more moving parts in the no moving parts generator?

The reactor has no moving parts. The generator has a few moving parts.

Water pump
Vacuum pump
Fans
And possibly moving parts in the startup and leveling system
 
Last edited:
The reactor has no moving parts. The generator has a few moving parts.

Water pump
Vacuum pump
Fans
And possibly moving parts in the startup and leveling system

And the switch to keep the power on... but really soon we will engineer out the need for the input energy... honest!
 
How much will the PV cells used in the SunCell weigh?

We have already seen your 13kw example where the PV cells weigh about a ton, give or take.

We have a contradiction here from what markie says and what MS says. One has told us they are not currently developing the photoev version of the generator, one says they are still developing it.
 
The reactor has no moving parts. The generator has a few moving parts.

Water pump
Vacuum pump
Fans
And possibly moving parts in the startup and leveling system

That doesn't seem like fewer moving parts than a steam generator:

UdRrtxV.jpg
 
Has anyone mentioned that the melting point of silicon is 1687 K?
 
We have a contradiction here from what markie says and what MS says. One has told us they are not currently developing the photoev version of the generator, one says they are still developing it.

I don't know where Markie is getting his info from, but every presentation BrLP has ever given they've talked about doing PV.

The latest media packet from BrLP they gave me is the first time I've heard of them doing anything other than PV, and they still intend to do PV along side the development of it's use as a boiler.
 
That doesn't seem like fewer moving parts than a steam generator:

You're forgetting the condenser rig that would be required.

And you're ignoring the epic weight of the equipment involved.

That picture also makes no mention of the turbines required.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom