• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm also a bit puzzled by the "400 years" reference. Guns are still being developed after over a millenium; the reason they're still being developed is that the original ones worked, and newer ones work better. On the other hand, human civilisation has failed to develop the magical death spell, despite at least as long to work on it, because like the hydrino energy generator nobody, apart from the occasional unverifiable charlatan, has actually been able to make it work at all.

Dave
 
 
LTC8K6 said:
Even if we were unaware of how gunpowder works, it does in fact work and this is easily demonstrated by any fool.
Click to expand...


Yes, and this is what I've been saying about his attempts to get patents for years now. Even if he didn't know how the system actually generated the energy, he could still get a patent, just so long as he could unambiguously demonstrate that energy production.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
That doesn't seem relevant to Mills' claim.
Click to expand...

What is relevant to Mills's claim that "academia is still clueless about the mechanism of gunpowder" is that so much is known about the mechanism that far more effective propellants and far more effective explosives can be and have been developed that use essentially the same chemistry and physics. To put it simply, his claim is a filthy stinking lie.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
What is relevant to Mills's claim that "academia is still clueless about the mechanism of gunpowder" is that so much is known about the mechanism that far more effective propellants and far more effective explosives can be and have been developed that use essentially the same chemistry and physics. To put it simply, his claim is a filthy stinking lie.
Click to expand...

That's why I posted links to two separate sources that explained the mechanism, and also one which highlighted what he might be referring to.

The point is that if he says "the properties of substance x are not yet known", then saying "substance y is also called substance x" isn't really a counter-argument.
 
jrhowell said:
I wonder what point he is trying to make. Does this mean he expect to need another 370 years to complete it?
Click to expand...
The point he is really making is that he is the one who is actually "clueless" about gunpowder. A few minutes of research would have found plenty of resources about gunpowder showing that it is mostly understood, i.e. plenty of clues.

There is the idiocy of hinting we should not use quantum mechanics when it works. The understanding of semiconductors thru QM is one reason why computers work so well.

There is the idiocy of "burning fossilized carbon" as if he expects that the world can instantly stop using fossil fuels.

Looking through that "Society for Classical Physics" forum suggests we are going to see more ignorance from Mills: Re: "something very weird is going on"
Working on getting the Nature papers. At t=0, the beginning of the expansion, observations should show a universe of about 2.75 K (Figure 32.9)...
Click to expand...
This is about Search for first stars uncovers 'dark matter' which is that a team found evidence of the first stars t about 180 million years after the Big Bang (not t=0) and an anomaly of colder than expected gas. They speculate that the gas cooled down through interaction with dark matter.
However read Dark Matter and the Earliest Stars
where a comment raises the possibility of this being a systematic error from the EDGES instrument.

FYI: That "Figure 32.9" is in his deluded book and really does have the temperature of the universe as about 2.75 K at t = 0 :jaw-dropp!
Then he idiotically has the temperature decreasing as time passes and getting to 0 at ~6.2 x 1011 years.

The reality is that the temperature of the CMB is measured to increase from its current value of about 2.75 K with redshift so that at a redshift of 3 it is ~11 K.
Constraints on the CMB Temperature Evolution using Multi-Band Measurements of the Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect with the South Pole Telescope
 
Last edited:
When it serves him, Mills falls back on examples of more glacially paced technological progress. He daren't remind of the spectacular leap from the Wright brothers to Apollo that occupied but 60 (!) years. Some individuals lived in the interval from the earliest years of the steam locomotive to Moon landings.
 
aleCcowaN said:
That is like 140 years (without counting Trevithick). Those individuals were extraordinarily longevous.

Change that phrase for "...the golden years of steam locomotion..." and it'll work.
Click to expand...

Actually, if you drop any hint of exacting time from the sentence, it remains truthful, is shorter, and still sounds just as impressive...
Lurch said:
Some individuals lived in the interval from the steam locomotive to Moon landings.
Click to expand...

Mills has already "burned" though half that same amount of time, with nothing but poor quality youtube videos of indeterminate origin to show for it.
Oh, and apparently a vast pile of cash, or what once was a vast pile of cash. Youtube videos don't make themselves.
 
Last edited:
I'm unsure what we're supposed to be looking at there. What's the white stuff supposed to be? Why is it supposed to be magnetic? If it's an example of magnetism, why does most of it remain distant and floaty, rather than being pulled to the metal object? Does it look to anybody else like spider's silk sticking to an object in an entirely mundane way?
 
Hmm, video of the formation of the "spider's web" here:



Can anybody explain what the likely chemical reaction actually is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom