Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

You do realise that the timing of the release of the statement of the re-opening of the investigation into Clinton's emails (and the very fact that there was a statement saying she was under investigation, while the fact that Trump was under investigation remained a secret) doesn't point to a pro-Clinton conspiracy, don't you?

 

[The Big Dog]

You do realise that the timing of the release of the statement of the re-opening of the investigation into Clinton's emails (and the very fact that there was a statement saying she was under investigation, while the fact that Trump was under investigation remained a secret) doesn't point to a pro-Clinton conspiracy, don't you?

Not sure what that link was supposed to prove, but we here in this thread have been discussing the facts that McCabe and others sat on the Weiner/Clinton emails until after the WSJ article broke about McCabe's conflicts and a senior DoJ official raised the issue to Comey.

If I was a Hillary apologist I would be livid that McCabe buried the evidence, rather then getting it out in the open in early October and letting the bombshell effect diminish before the election.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Not sure what that link was supposed to prove, but we here in this thread have been discussing the facts that McCabe and others sat on the Weiner/Clinton emails until after the WSJ article broke about McCabe's conflicts and a senior DoJ official raised the issue to Comey.

If I was a Hillary apologist I would be livid that McCabe buried the evidence, rather then getting it out in the open in early October and letting the bombshell effect diminish before the election.

Perhaps you ought to read the link. Its relevance is obvious.

 

[The Big Dog]

Perhaps you ought to read the link. Its relevance is obvious.

An 80 plus twitter "thread"? Sounds totes legit.

Anyway, I'll keep extra far from "True Pundit."

From the Twitter "thread" (the guy can't afford a *********** blog??)

Unfortunately, the same FBI field office that had been occasionally leaking to True Pundit about the Clinton email investigation over the summer was the one now in possession of Wiener's computer—so when Comey instructed them to see if it had any new emails, they ignored him.

Uh oh, this is blatantly false. We know the field office told FBI headquarters about the laptop and that McCabe had the laptop and emails from at least 9/28/16.

mayhap we not get our information from twitter conspiracy nuts who can't afford a blog?

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

An 80 plus twitter "thread"? Sounds totes legit.

Anyway, I'll keep extra far from "True Pundit."

From the Twitter "thread" (the guy can't afford a *********** blog??)

Unfortunately, the same FBI field office that had been occasionally leaking to True Pundit about the Clinton email investigation over the summer was the one now in possession of Wiener's computer—so when Comey instructed them to see if it had any new emails, they ignored him.

Uh oh, this is blatantly false. We know the field office told FBI headquarters about the laptop and that McCabe had the laptop and emails from at least 9/28/16.

mayhap we not get our information from twitter conspiracy nuts who can't afford a blog?

Oh, well, if you're not going to a) read it, or b) pay attention to what it actually says, then you feel free to believe whatever nonsense you like.

 

[The Big Dog]

Oh, well, if you're not going to a) read it, or b) pay attention to what it actually says, then you feel free to believe whatever nonsense you like.

Oh dear me. Did you not see where I actually quoted it and demolished it?

It is utterly worthless, of zero value then, and if it did have value when he wrote an 80 post "thread" on twitter (it did not) any value has been destroyed by newly discovered facts of the exact sort that I have been discussing.

In all seriousness: It is absolute *********** garbage.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yes, dear.

Yes indeed. Comey told Congress he became aware of the Weiner emails on October 27, 2016 (McCabe emailed him that morning at 5 am to tell Comey they had to meet to discuss the emails that McCabe had for a month)

Your conspiracy nut wrote this:

Unfortunately, the same FBI field office that had been occasionally leaking to True Pundit about the Clinton email investigation over the summer was the one now in possession of Wiener's computer—so when Comey instructed them to see if it had any new emails, they ignored him.

man, to have him lie SO BLATANTLY that has got to piss you off. TBD is here to demolish lies and give facts.

 

[NoahFence]

 

[Childlike Empress]

Perhaps you ought to read the link. Its relevance is obvious.

TBD is absolutely correct: In case of your twitter guru the very medium he chooses exposes him as a waste of time. You use twitter if your words are the news, say if you are POTUS or a rock star or a journalist on the ground reporting primary sources. If you are some guy giving their take on other's information, like we here or your guru, the minimum requirement is that you choose a medium where you can properly source your claims. He uses twitter because he spins tales he wants his readers to take at face value.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

man, to have him lie SO BLATANTLY that has got to piss you off.

I think you have me mistaken for somebody else.

 

[The Big Dog]

I think you have me mistaken for somebody else.

It is fine, you posted a false "article," then after having used up my valuable time to correct that link your provided, you have made a series of snarky, substance-free comments.

Understood.

 

[mgidm86]

TBD is absolutely correct: In case of your twitter guru the very medium he chooses exposes him as a waste of time. You use twitter if your words are the news, say if you are POTUS or a rock star or a journalist on the ground reporting primary sources. If you are some guy giving their take on other's information, like we here or your guru, the minimum requirement is that you choose a medium where you can properly source your claims. He uses twitter because he spins tales he wants his readers to take at face value.

Agreed. It's some guy's take on things. I read most of it. It's a conspiracy theory.

 

[Galaxie]

*deleted*

 

[grandmastershek]

Allegedly Obama was inquiring into the investigation.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

Allegedly Obama was inquiring into the investigation.

As was his job: the integrity of the election was at stake

 

[The Big Dog]

As was his job: the integrity of the election was at stake

Yeah, monitoring field agents as they go about their duties isn't the President's job. In fact, if one were to give it a thought, it is pretty clear that it smacks of interference.

 

[grandmastershek]

As was his job: the integrity of the election was at stake

Understandable, however, the screechers are crying this somehow makes the Mueller investigation invalid cuz....Obama.

 

[The Big Dog]

Understandable, however, the screechers are crying this somehow makes the Mueller investigation invalid cuz....Obama.

Yeah, pretty certain the Mueller is not investigating the Clinton emails fiasco.

 

[The Big Dog]

There were substantial edits to former FBI Director James Comey's public statement that served to downplay the severity of Secretary Clinton's actions, and that the first draft of the memo was distributed for editing two months before key witnesses were interviewed.

Fixed from the get go by the Obama/Clinton cabal.

This is a link for you to read

 

[TheL8Elvis]

Allegedly Obama was inquiring into the investigation.

"Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016, about prepping Comey because "potus wants to know everything we're doing." According to a newly released Senate report, this text raises questions about Obama's personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation."
No, it doesn't

https://thinkprogress.org/fox-news-latest-bombshell-fraud-def2fc228456/

It’s simply not a plausible interpretation of the September 2, 2016 text exchange that Obama was seeking a briefing on the Clinton email investigation.

FBI Director James Comey closed the Clinton email investigation on July 5, 2016. It was not reopened until October. The same trove of text messages released Tuesday reveals that the FBI did not even become aware of additional emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop until September 28, 2016.

So yeah, wrong thread.