Status
Not open for further replies.
Same thing is true for the Mueller investigation, because despite what the *********** Moron-in-Chief tells you, we still have a functioning legal system.


I do wonder on what evidence these right-wing individuals are basing their claims of anti-Trump bias in the Mueller investigation. It seems like "because they're finding dirt on people involved with Trump," or even "because there's an investigation at all" are the only things they're basing the judgement on.
 
Last edited:
I do wonder on what evidence these right-wing individuals are basing their claims of anti-Trump bias in the Mueller investigation. It seems like "because they're finding dirt on people involved with Trump," or even "because there's an investigation at all" are the only things their basing the judgement on.

I wonder if anyone in the FBI had a bias against Al Capone.
 
Imagine a world where simply finding evidence that links a person to a crime means you have such a bias against that person that your efforts are highly suspect and, therefore, should be thrown out.

How could anyone ever be convicted of a crime they actually committed?
 
Rachel Maddow's special report on the dossier last night was excellent.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...out-despite-investigative-dearth-892646467509

:thumbsup: Must-see TV.


Thirded. When she works from a full script or when she’s interviewed there’s none better.

OTOH, her pedantry and repetition can be maddening. I want context but at times it seems she can’t say someone took a dump without first delivering a ten page dissertation on the history of ****. IMO that’s driven in part by the need to fill the hour time slot.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if anyone in the FBI had a bias against Al Capone.
I wonder if Ken Starr had a bias against Bill Clinton?

Back when the GOP was facilitating and encouraging the ever-widening scope of a special prosecutor's investigation, active minds noted that this could one day prove to be a rod for their own backs. Ditto when they made filibusters an automatic response, not exceptional. Ditto making government shutdown a legitimate political tactic.

Short term expedients for short-term partisans ends, ultimately wrecknig the whole system of government. Which, for the GOP, counts as a success.
 
I wonder if Ken Starr had a bias against Bill Clinton?


You are forgetting the key difference.

When Republicans do it, that means it's okay.

Back when the GOP was facilitating and encouraging the ever-widening scope of a special prosecutor's investigation, active minds noted that this could one day prove to be a rod for their own backs. Ditto when they made filibusters an automatic response, not exceptional. Ditto making government shutdown a legitimate political tactic.


See above.

Short term expedients for short-term partisans ends, ultimately wrecknig the whole system of government. Which, for the GOP, counts as a success.


See above.
 
At New York's Kennedy airport today, an individual later discovered to be a
public school teacher was arrested trying to board a flight while in
possession of a ruler, a protractor, a setsquare, a slide rule, and a
calculator.

At a morning press conference, Attorney general Jefferson Sessions said he
believes the man is a member of the notorious Al-Gebra movement. He is
being charged by the FBI with carrying weapons of math instruction.

"Al-Gebra is a fearsome cult,", Sessions said. "They desire average
solutions by means and extremes, and sometimes go off on tangents in a
search of absolute value. They use secret code names like "x" and "y"
and refer to themselves as "unknowns", but we have determined they belong
to a common denominator of the axis of medieval with coordinates in every
country.

"As the Greek philanderer Isosceles used to say, there are 3
sides to every triangle," Sessions declared.

When asked to comment on the arrest, President Trump said, "If God had
wanted us to have better weapons of math instruction, He would have given us
more fingers and toes. "I am gratified that our government has given us a
sine that it is intent on protracting us from these math-dogs who are
willing to disintegrate us with calculus disregard. Murky statisticians love to
inflict plane on every sphere of influence," the President said, adding: "Under
the circumferences, we must differentiate their root, make our point, and
draw the line."

President Trump warned, "These weapons of math instruction have the
potential to decimal everything in their math on a scalene never before seen
unless we become exponents of a Higher Power and begin to factor-in random facts
of vertex."

Attorney General Sessions said, "As our Great Leader would say, read my
ellipse. Here is one principle he is uncertainty of: though they continue to
multiply, their days are numbered as the hypotenuse tightens around
their necks."
 
Last edited:
You think my posting information that shows how corrupt our government agencies are is me squirming? Lol

You think highlighting how corrupt and desperate this investigation is and how much Hills and Obama were involved with it is me squirming? Lol

Yup.
 
About the fake news WikiLeaks eMail claims, Greenwald:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened

GG said:
FRIDAY WAS ONE of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time. The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day. By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people, while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened. [...]


Unlike for the NBC(?) clown recently, there will be no consequences as "multiple sources" provided them with the false information. Think of that next time you'll read "three sources familiar with the topic said..." in your propaganda outlets. ;):rolleyes:
 
About the fake news WikiLeaks eMail claims, Greenwald:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened




Unlike for the NBC(?) clown recently, there will be no consequences as "multiple sources" provided them with the false information. Think of that next time you'll read "three sources familiar with the topic said..." in your propaganda outlets. ;):rolleyes:

If your point here is that all news sources should be approached with scepticism then, well, I'm not sure you'll find too many who disagree on a sceptics' website.
 
If your point here is that all news sources should be approached with scepticism then, well, I'm not sure you'll find too many who disagree on a sceptics' website.

Was Glenn Greenwald in a coma through the run up to the Iraq War? I mean that's hard to top for journalistic failures.
 
About the fake news WikiLeaks eMail claims, Greenwald:

The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened




Unlike for the NBC(?) clown recently, there will be no consequences as "multiple sources" provided them with the false information. Think of that next time you'll read "three sources familiar with the topic said..." in your propaganda outlets. ;):rolleyes:

What I think of every time I read anything from your propaganda outlets is Putin and his gang sucking the life-blood out of Russia, but I'm genuinely amused if Trump's gang thinks they've got a Get Out of Jail Free card here.
 
The justice department was informed about a candidate running for president having been potentially compromised by a hostile foreign government.

And you think that is "bombshell" evidence of some conspiracy?
:jaw-dropp

Lol
Your skepticism is typical here.
 
Imagine a world where simply finding evidence that links a person to a crime means you have such a bias against that person that your efforts are highly suspect and, therefore, should be thrown out.

How could anyone ever be convicted of a crime they actually committed?

Ah, suddenly Benghazi makes sense. They kept not finding any dirt, so that means they weren't biased. No?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom