If I'm part of the 0.3%, it wouldn't make a bit of difference.
Yeah but what are the chances you would be in the 0.3%?
If I'm part of the 0.3%, it wouldn't make a bit of difference.
Nope. Not what I said at all. They are already protected under law from harassment same as you and I.Exactly harassing freaks like this should have special legal sanction.
And the gigantic Russian straw athelete sprints in from left field....By this reasoning, Russian athletes aren't women either.
This is just one step up from the former argument that if you don't want to have sex with them, they aren't really women (which means your mother isn't a woman either).
(On the more productive topic than the OP personal hangups on women, there are many medical conditions that prevent people from engaging in competitive sports, and being transgender is generally one of them.)
I don't know if the 0.3% of trans people will really tip the balance that much, but it sure isn't fair _IF_ the trans woman has the build and hormones of a man.
Doesn't take a lot. One transwoman weightlifter levels the playing field for all the ciswomen weightlifters. All the records become her records. Any woman who competes in the same tournaments or championships must accept second place as her highest aspiration. Any woman who competes in events without the transwoman must accept that their first place exists in her shadow.
Would it destroy women's sport if we let 0.3% of male athletes compete against them? I think probably, yeah it would.
And yet it doesn't matter enough that drivers (riders?) are selected the same way as horse jockeys.
If transwomen are allowed to compete athletically as women, it will effectively exclude ciswomen from athletic competition.
And yet riders still aren't selected like jockeys.Tell that to Nico Hulkenberg. He's lost out on several F1 drives due to being the biggest guy in the field.
I seem to remember much the same discussions about trans tennis player Renee Richards.
The conclusion was that though Richards might enjoy an advantage at first, this would rapidly dissapear as continued use of female hormones would tend to equalize the difference.
If your talking transgender and female weightlifting in NZ . YepIs this a real problem?
Are Transwomen who have undergone hormone therapy for a few years really advantaged compared to cis-women with advantageous genetics? I guess they might have some advantage in proportions/leverage, but on balance, I really wonder.
As I understand (based only on listening to a doctor on a podcast) the advantage in bone density lasts for decades.
Those darn genetic disorders of melabolism. Where is the fairness and equality for them?Or else, next thing we have a boxer claiming to be a feather weight trapped in a heavy weight body!
If your talking transgender and female weightlifting in NZ . Yep
An argument I've heard some is that it's important for transgirls to begin the biological portion of their transitions as early as possible since going through male puberty results in permanent physical changes that subsequent hormone therapy and surgeries cannot undo. That seems consistent with the position that some of the male advantages in sport simply cannot be erased using currently available medical techniques. Might be different for people who transition at a very early age.