Basis of Immortality?

Kumar said:
This is the attribute of non A&F. Either accept all non A&F or all A&F. Practically, accept all non A&F.
Click to expand...

We just have to accept your dishonesty because of the dishonest concept that you made up? Seems.... what's the word I'm searching for.... dishonest
 
Filippo Lippi said:
We just have to accept your dishonesty because of the dishonest concept that you made up? Seems.... what's the word I'm searching for.... dishonest
Click to expand...

It is not dishonesty. It is honesty due to confusion created by people here. They do not accept A&F anyway therefore we including me shall have to accept Non A&F on all sides.
 
Kumar said:
It is not dishonesty. It is honesty due to confusion created by people here. They do not accept A&F anyway therefore we including me shall have to accept Non A&F on all sides.
Click to expand...

You don't have to accept a diddly squat. You just should stop posting nonsense.

It seems that your fantasy of A&F should include everyone agreeing. That's not how the universe works or should work.
 
Kumar said:
It is not dishonesty. It is honesty due to confusion created by people here. They do not accept A&F anyway therefore we including me shall have to accept Non A&F on all sides.
Click to expand...


No, the fact that we can't know everything does not entitle you to go nuclear by claiming that all evidence is of equivalent weight.
 
aleCcowaN said:
You don't have to accept a diddly squat. You just should stop posting nonsense.

It seems that your fantasy of A&F should include everyone agreeing. That's not how the universe works or should work.
Click to expand...

I am happy, everyone somewhat agreed that they will accept non A&F from all sides. It will stop posting non-sense or bitter sense of A&F or encourage posting sense or non-sense of Non A&F.
 
Kumar said:
I am happy, everyone somewhat agreed that they will accept non A&F from all sides.
Click to expand...


Yes, because "A&F" doesn't exist and is unattainable. But this doesn't mean that others have to accept your half-baked conjectures, or accept the sort of weak and unreliable evidence you favour over the better evidence that contradicts it.
 
Mojo said:
Yes, because "A&F" doesn't exist and is unattainable. But this doesn't mean that others have to accept your half-baked conjectures, or accept the sort of weak and unreliable evidence you favour over the better evidence that contradicts it.
Click to expand...

Logically, you should accept. Do regard everyone as you do to yourself. Yes, you can reject zero or minus evidences but should not 1+ evidences depending on side effects by that.
 
Last edited:
I think you're saying we should nod along with your nonsense out of respect. Well, no, frankly. Present some evidence or stop making claims
 
Filippo Lippi said:
And you learn nothing from that
Click to expand...
Ok, this evidence:

Placebo responses may also be able to tap into dopamine-mediated reward pathways. In a landmark American study using a special type of PET scanning that enables researchers to look specifically at dopamine in the brain, University of Michigan researchers demonstrated that when pain is anticipated, placebo administration is accompanied by dopamine release in a ‘reward area’: the nucleus accumbens[4]. The more participants expected a benefit from the placebo, the more they experienced pain relief.
http://www.pharmaceutical-journal.c...-more-than-meets-the-eye/20069282.fullarticle
Click to expand...

Mostly in previous time, medical system was not much advanced. So learned people had preferred natural/other ways for healing. One way was to follow faith/religion, strictly. Its purpose should had been to create faith/placebo/reward expectation related scientific healing effects as indicated above and to motivate its followers to practice healthful activities, again for health & healing---and that too be a natural healing mechanism with least side effects.
 
Last edited:
What is this supposed to be evidence for? I'm confused. The existence of the placebo effect has no bearing on 'immortality' or your strange idea of 'A&F', which were being discussed on the last few pages of the thread...

Also, the placebo effect does not constitute 'healing'.
It affects the subjective experience of symptoms, not the affliction itself.
 
Porpoise of Life said:
What is this supposed to be evidence for? I'm confused. The existence of the placebo effect has no bearing on 'immortality' or your strange idea of 'A&F', which were being discussed on the last few pages of the thread...

Also, the placebo effect does not constitute 'healing'.
It affects the subjective experience of symptoms, not the affliction itself.
Click to expand...
Now it is again proved, you anyway contradict me or demand A&F evidences from me in odd preception. Last poster asked for evidence and I provided. Still.
 
Kumar said:
Now it is again proved, you anyway contradict me or demand A&F evidences from me in odd preception. Last poster asked for evidence and I provided. Still.
Click to expand...

Yes, still. Still lacking evidence.

If you were going to avoid the question and provide random texts, why didn't you contribute a recipe for a snack or something useful instead?
 
aleCcowaN said:
Yes, still. Still lacking evidence.

If you were going to avoid the question and provide random texts, why didn't you contribute a recipe for a snack or something useful instead?
Click to expand...

This also prove, you demand A&F evidences but don't want to give.
 
Is this still about your dishonest claim that we are asking for 'A&F'? (While nobody but you even accepts it exists)

Is that why you're ignoring my question? Because you'de have to admit that your quote about the placebo effect has nothing to do with your claim that Loss Leader demands 'A&F' from you?

I'm really trying to find a more charitable explanation, but I'm failing here...
 
Porpoise of Life said:
Is this still about your dishonest claim that we are asking for 'A&F'? (While nobody but you even accepts it exists)

Is that why you're ignoring my question? Because you'de have to admit that your quote about the placebo effect has nothing to do with your claim that Loss Leader demands 'A&F' from you?

I'm really trying to find a more charitable explanation, but I'm failing here...
Click to expand...

I do not understand what you are saying. Discussions on religion are going on in almost all of my threads. One poster asked me for evidence, I presented it relevant to religion/faith effect.
 
Kumar said:
I do not understand what you are saying. Discussions on religion are going on in almost all of my threads. One poster asked me for evidence, I presented it relevant to religion/faith effect.
Click to expand...

Yes, you do not understand. Your misrepresentations of religion are numerous. Your understanding of and representation of evidence is severely wanting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom