Senator Al Franken Kissed and Groped Me Without My Consent, And There’s Nothing Funny

I agree and sorry for the Poe.

More satire: "Real" sexual harrassment? Let me guess, that's like "legitimate" rape, huh?

Seems like these days the gaming of the cause seems to be in full swing before the actual cause has even gotten started (this is an actual sincere statement, btw).

Given that irony and sarcasm are difficult to detect on the Internet, I still can't determine if you are trolling me or not.

Have you read the stories of Weinstein, Rose, Ailes Louis CK, Kevin Spacey, O'Reilly and Moore? Do you think they are remotely similar to the stories we've heard about Franken?
 
Given that irony and sarcasm are difficult to detect on the Internet, I still can't determine if you are trolling me or not.

I'm joining you in lamenting how there's no dynamics in our outrage (through terrible humor).

Have you read the stories of Weinstein, Rose, Ailes Louis CK, Kevin Spacey, O'Reilly and Moore? Do you think they are remotely similar to the stories we've heard about Franken?

Yes. No.
 
True, but the super **********-up thing is, he's not wrong.

Like the lack of dynamics in describing some reserved judgement and discussion of nuance as "steamrolling" from one side. Which is not to say that this "side" was entirely free of indefensible remarks, but that just even further makes my point.

ETA: the futility of trying to make some point about tribalism by reducing the discussion to a series of one-dimensional caricatures is beyond comprehension.
 
Last edited:
Like the lack of dynamics in describing some reserved judgement and discussion of nuance as "steamrolling" from one side.

Oh... what... a.... load. My arm is not long enough for the jerk off motion that is in my soul right now.

People bending over backwards to make excuses when it's someone from "their side" in the spotlight is not "nuance."
 
Oh... what... a.... load. My arm is not long enough for the jerk off motion that is in my soul right now.

People bending over backwards to make excuses when it's someone from "their side" in the spotlight is not "nuance."

Then you're absolutely clueless. Conyers is a Democratic liberal congressman and the evidence against him is pretty damn compelling that he is guilty of sexual harassment. In contrast, the evidence I've seen against Al Franken is not.

Is this what it takes today is a he said, she said story about a kiss during a rehearsal 2 years before he ran for office?

Seriously?
 
Last edited:
Is this what it takes today is a he said, she said story about a kiss during a rehearsal of a kiss 2 years before he ran for office?

What am I saying is if this exact to the letter situation happened with a Republican a lot of roles in this thread would be reversed and I don't know who the people (on both sides) pretending otherwise think they are fooling.

The actual standard for what the public should consider "fair evidence" for sexual harassment is... a discussion I hope we can have one day but we aren't there right now.
 
Then you're absolutely clueless. Conyers is a Democratic liberal congressman and the evidence against him is pretty damn compelling that he is guilty of sexual harassment. In contrast, the evidence I've seen against Al Franken is not.

Is this what it takes today is a he said, she said story about a kiss during a rehearsal 2 years before he ran for office?

Seriously?

He said nothing, he claimed he remembered it differently but never said how he remembered it.

Plus it is she said, she said, he said ****.
 
By golly, your reading and parsing skills need some heavy assistance! Here, I highlighted the important bit. You read only half of it. What I said I believe ("neither needed practice") applies to BOTH cases "with tongue" and "without tongue", and I very specifically and deliberately added "or any kiss" to include, cover, consider, offer the "no tongue" option.

Sorry if I didn't make it clear enough even for you.

Now need I be an actor to be able to judge whether kissing for a OSU skit required practice, practice and more intense practice? Hell no! It wasn't the climax scene of a Shakespear play, it was a simple, silly OSU skit!


False premise is false.

I'm done with this Oystein. You assert Franken tongued the woman then claim you didn't. It's a big fat roadblock to moving the discussion forward.

It's not my reading skills. It's you believing you are being neutral or whatever, and then over and over posting that Franken did it. Go re-read your own posts. It's impossible to carry on a discussion when you don't realize how your posts come across and then you complain about others' reading skills.

Enough of this game.
 
He said nothing, he claimed he remembered it differently but never said how he remembered it.

Plus it is she said, she said, he said ****.

Maybe, because it was so insignificant in his mind that he barely remembered it. Also, even if everything Tweeden said was 100% accurate, it still doesn't rise to the level of sexual harassment.
 
I never saw Rose interview Hillary. I also can't say I've watched him on the morning show either where I guess he dropped a lot of sexual innuendo. My memories are of him conducting some excellent interviews. I always liked him. Now I'm left thinking he was a pig.
I also enjoyed Rose's interviews but many of the ones I saw were him interviewing male actors. I was disgusted with his Clinton interview. I wanted to yell at the TV, "Stop interrupting, let the woman answer!" I'd never seen anything like it in his other interviews but thinking back I couldn't recall any interviews with women. I counted 30 interruptions by Rose in this transcript of half the interview. (You may have to click on "transcript".)

I never watch the Today Show or whatever it is he's also on either.

Franken seems to me as someone who became known through his comedy and as such you might expect some outrageous behavior. But he has ALWAYS had a serious side having graduated from Harvard. He also has demonstrated that he is someone who cares about others. Everything I know about Al Franken tells me that he is a good man and neither of these accusations/incidents makes we waiver from that belief in the slightest. Now if information came to light that is significantly worse then I would have to reevaluate.
I feel the same. Hopefully it will get sorted out.
 
I don't think Roy Moore is fit to serve in the Senate and I'm starting to think Franken isn't either. I haven't read much on the second accuser but it doesn't look good. I suspect both parties can come up with perfectly good candidates who have never assaulted women. Seems a reasonable, minimum standard.
Right, he poses for thousands of pics with fans and one claims he put his hand on her butt when they stood together for the pic, real damning. :rolleyes:

Where are the reports that "everyone knew about Franken"? They're not hard to find on the other men.
 
I don't think Roy Moore is fit to serve in the Senate and I'm starting to think Franken isn't either. I haven't read much on the second accuser but it doesn't look good. I suspect both parties can come up with perfectly good candidates who have never assaulted women. Seems a reasonable, minimum standard.

Watch Franken on old SNL shows and your mind will be made up.
 
Current Minnesota governor is a Democrat and would appoint Franken's replacement. Your argument, if not a joke, is a fail.

Well, really, it was intended to be facetious mocking of Kellyanne Conway, but nobody took the bait:

The Hill said:
“Doug Jones in Alabama, folks, don’t be fooled. He will be a vote against tax cuts. He is weak on crime, weak on borders. He is strong on raising your taxes. He is terrible for property owners," Conway said on "Fox & Friends."

“So, vote Roy Moore?” host Brian Kilmeade interjected.

“I’m telling you that we want the votes in the Senate to get this tax bill through,” Conway said, calling Jones a “doctrinaire liberal.”
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/361164-conway-on-moore-we-want-the-votes-to-pass-tax-reform

Today, Trump (unsurprisingly) expressed the same sentiment:

The Hill said:
"We don't need a liberal person in there, a Democrat,” Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House.
http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...bama-race-we-dont-need-a-democrat-in-the-seat

So, according to our unregistered sex offender president and his toadies and sycophants, given a choice between a Republican child molester and a liberal, you should go with the child molester. And yet a shockingly small percentage of Republicans are ashamed of what their party has become.
 
Last edited:
I also enjoyed Rose's interviews but many of the ones I saw were him interviewing male actors. I was disgusted with his Clinton interview. I wanted to yell at the TV, "Stop interrupting, let the woman answer!" I'd never seen anything like it in his other interviews but thinking back I couldn't recall any interviews with women. I counted 30 interruptions by Rose in this transcript of half the interview. (You may have to click on "transcript".)

I never watch the Today Show or whatever it is he's also on either.

I can't remember an in depth interview with a woman ever. This isn't meant to excuse him...there is no excuse but Rose is in his 70s. Sort of 1 foot in the old school so maybe the way he handled that interview isn't all the surprising.

I guess John Oliver has been making jokes for a while about ' the creepy sex banter on the CBS Morning show where Rose is an anchor.

I'm going to pass on watching the Hillary interview as I'm sure it will just piss me off.
 
Watch Franken on old SNL shows and your mind will be made up.

Not sure what that means? But how can you make up your mind based upon a tv show designed to make people laugh? I don't think you can get any kind of clue of what Franken is like off camera from what you see on SNL. A better clue is the letter 36 women that he worked with on SNL signed saying that Al treated them with the utmost respect.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom