Yes, I think that's what the person meant. But, the way you write it, it seems a little long. Good for elementary school, but a little long for an internet forum:
So what - you have a number of criticisms for your too simplistic work on telepathy, just in this long thread. Ask any undergraduate science student about
given their next post:
And perhaps you need yourself to revise basic spelling ("complement" instead of "compliment"; the two words are very different). And I don't know why you put a strange "s" in your sentence: "Is this s complement or sarcasm?".
right after I have posted my analysis of the results of a test, it is a compliment, not sarcasm, and this compliment is not erased by a mild criticism which may have been made later.
This, to me, was another compliment for my careful work (this complimentary post was liked by two other members, possibly [not certainly] experts in parapsychology too).
I am still hearing voices in my head, and animals outside (dogs and birds) still have the habit of reacting to what I tell them (or even to movements of one of my arms). This could be tested, I suppose but it would be difficult (they might behave very differently under test conditions, be less spontaneous).I assume everyone has noticed MichelH's "switcheroo". Originally he heard other people's voices. He then claimed he could command animals to do things.
As animals don't lie, MichelH can be tested tomorrow using animals. He knows that so he dropped this claim. I suggest MichelH's claims change according to what audience he thinks is responding.
Perhaps there is a very serious and very alarming problem of lack of honesty on this forum.
I think there is. When a statement "The design was flawless." becomes "sarcasm", and when "Congratulations on once again proving telepathy." becomes an insult, this means (to me, at least) that you have collectively reached an acute level of dishonesty and of bad faith in this forum.
