MicahJava
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
- Messages
- 3,039
Yes his decoder ring leads him to believe there are two entry head wounds, but as we all know the autopsy record has only one and every commission, agency, panel, committee has agreed to that fact. He fails miserably on that point, time to buy a new cereal box.
1. Photographs and X-rays of the Harper fragment are all we have left. The Harper fragment has gone missing, so the photographs and X-rays are due to be re-examined for any evidence of a tangential wound.
2. There doesn't need to be proof of inward beveling in the skull to prove a separate shot to the head, especially in a case where large portions of skull bone went missing.
3. The autopsy doctors could simply be dishonest about what they saw. Richard Lipsey described the autopsy doctors discussing more than one gunshot to the head, with one entering the EOP and the second tangentially striking the right side of the head.