Belz...
Fiend God
Sounds legit.
Yup, and its fairly stringent today. The required number of adults per scout for *any* official gathering, be it a regular meeting or camp out, is pretty high. Long gone are the days of an adult troop leader and a couple of dozen scouts.
Too generic. I'd confuse them with actual scouts i.e. people who scout for an armed force, etc.![]()
It must be our local troop that requires more adults at all gatherings. I checked official Scouting rules and they require a minimum of two adults. Not just any adults will do. All volunteers have to submit adequate identification and be certified as volunteers by passing a class. The local troop will cancel events if they don't get 1:6 adults to kids. Its a good sized troop - regularly around 20 kids on the monthly camp outs, and five adults.When I took the training, the only absolute requirement was two unrelated adults be present whenever a boy was present. I wasn't a Scoutmaster, though, just a merit badge counselor, so maybe the scoutmaster training had different information related to planning outings.
I do know that it was strictly against BSA policy to allow a kid to come to your house to work on a merit badge unless there was an unrelated adult present. i.e. I couldn't tell a scout to come over to the house with just me and my family at home. The kid's parent or some other adult not related to me had to also be present.
Some do, sure. And they still can. Some benefit from a mixed environment. They now have that option. More choice.
I guess there's nothing to stop a co-ed organisation continuing to run sessions that are segregated, if they really want to. As long as there is a clear purpose to that. But I actually can't think of many things that would be better if experienced separately based on gender.
There is the argument that girls tend to be more confident taking leadership roles when in an all girl environment, than in a mixed as the boys usually grab them. Whether this is still the case these days is probably arguable and I have no stats to prove it but I would imagine it may still be an issue
Was more to do with when you have group tasks.Girls are being admitted to the Cub level of the Boy Scouts - children 10 and under. To my knowledge Cub units have no youth leadership positions, only adult "den leaders".
Too generic. I'd confuse them with actual scouts i.e. people who scout for an armed force, etc.![]()
Girls are being admitted to the Cub level of the Boy Scouts - children 10 and under. To my knowledge Cub units have no youth leadership positions, only adult "den leaders".
And the Cub Scout packs will be single-gender, which will probably remain that way as they grow up into Scout troops. I haven't seen anything that mentions if they will allow co-ed Scouting troops for the oldest Scouts when the first girls get to be that age. If they're smart, BSA will have figured that out already.
Why? That's what they are called in the UK and Commonwealth; Scouts. I can think of only about 3 military units, all disbanded long, long ago, that actually included the word scouts in their title. Kit Carson, Malayan and Selous.
This is a minor nitpick - but it is my understanding that the dens will be single gender but the packs will be mixed gender - multiple dens make up a pack.
I can't imagine a single-gender, all girl unit in the Boy Scouts being successful.
Why not?
My reasoning is that there wouldn't be a sufficient number of girls interested, so that girls would be segregated into their own patrol, but the patrol wouldn't be viable. If you could get six interested girls together, all at once, to form their own patrol, it could work, but getting them all together all at once would be difficult. The next problem would be that the one all girl patrol in the troop would be treated differently from the rest of the patrols, and they would feel like outsiders, and drop out.
Part of my thoughts on the subject is that it makes no sense to have segregated dens in Cub Scouts anyway. What's the point? When you get to teen years/Boy Scouts, it starts to make some sort of sense, for obvious reasons, but in Cub Scouts, there really is no reason, so why do it? it makes me question the motives.
If I were doing this program, and decided to allow girls in Cub and Boy Scouts, I think I would allow the option of all girl dens and/or patrols, under the provision that the smallest number of scouts in a den/patrol would be N, and if there are not enough girls to form that patrol, the girls would have to be integrated into a mixed gender patrol.